Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-25 Thread Toad
On Fri, Jun 25, 2004 at 09:52:33AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > That was helpful - thanks. > > Sorry to belabor the issue, but I still wonder if 100 is a reasonable > number of connections, why would the default be 200? Shouldn't the > default be 100? It's unclear ATM. We need a reasonabl

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-25 Thread freenetproject
That was helpful - thanks. Sorry to belabor the issue, but I still wonder if 100 is a reasonable number of connections, why would the default be 200? Shouldn't the default be 100? Kevin Steen wrote: All the config options and their code-specified default values can be found on the web interface

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-25 Thread Kevin Steen
All the config options and their code-specified default values can be found on the web interface: http://127.0.0.1:/servlet/nodeinfo/documentation/cli If you don't use the Windows graphical configuration tool, I'd suggest deleting all the default entries in the config file and using a file

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-25 Thread freenetproject
Thanks, that worked. Would you happen to know the min/max for the entries that have a numeric value? Salah Coronya wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults? Apparently the .conf file is not

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread Salah Coronya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults? > Apparently the .conf file is not updated when the version is updated. > > Toad wrote: > >> >> No, it's 200. It used to be 512. >> >

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread freenetproject
Will someone please post the new .conf file with min/max and defaults? Apparently the .conf file is not updated when the version is updated. Toad wrote: No, it's 200. It used to be 512. ___ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gm

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:38:11AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Toad wrote: > > > >OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running > >for a day or so it should accumulate more... a reasonable number is 100+ > >connections... > > > > If 100 is a reasonable number, then

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread freenetproject
Toad wrote: OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running for a day or so it should accumulate more... a reasonable number is 100+ connections... If 100 is a reasonable number, then why is the default in the .conf file maxNodeConnections=512? Please correct me if I'm wron

Re: [freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread Toad
On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 10:31:41AM +0200, Jano wrote: > Latest stable, windows 2000, java 1.4.2: > > After a restart and seeing that I have these peers: > > Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 13 (12/1/200) OUCH! Have you reseeded recently? In any case if you leave it running for a

[freenet-support] RNFs

2004-06-24 Thread Jano
Latest stable, windows 2000, java 1.4.2: After a restart and seeing that I have these peers: Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit) 13 (12/1/200) Transfers active (Transmitting/Receiving) 1 (0/1) Data waiting to be transferred None Total amount of data transf