[freenet-support] Re: Disk Thrashing issues

2005-09-28 Thread Bob
Squished Squirrel writes: > S ...> writes: > > > I would venture to say that increasing VM is more likely to increase > > disk access, not decrease it. -Xmx does seem to be what you want, > > though; it will set a ceiling on the amount of RAM that Java will > > allocate. > > > > Try disabling

[freenet-support] Re: Disk Thrashing issues

2005-09-28 Thread Bob
Squished Squirrel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > S ...> writes: > > > I would venture to say that increasing VM is more likely to increase > > disk access, not decrease it. -Xmx does seem to be what you want, > > though; it will set a ceiling on the amount of RAM that Java will > > allocate. > >

[freenet-support] Re: Disk Thrashing issues

2005-09-28 Thread Squished Squirrel
S writes: > I would venture to say that increasing VM is more likely to increase > disk access, not decrease it. -Xmx does seem to be what you want, > though; it will set a ceiling on the amount of RAM that Java will > allocate. > > Try disabling Virtual Memory in Windows altogether, and see if

[freenet-support] Re: Disk Thrashing issues

2005-09-27 Thread Squished Squirrel
S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I would venture to say that increasing VM is more likely to increase > disk access, not decrease it. -Xmx does seem to be what you want, > though; it will set a ceiling on the amount of RAM that Java will > allocate. > > Try disabling Virtual Memory in Windows alto