Message: 3
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:54:35 + (UTC)
From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
...The government in New Zealand has decided
On 16/07/2004, at 7:52 AM, Garb wrote:
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 20:54:35 + (UTC)
From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [freenet-support] Re: Freenet Expectations]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 02:00:16AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
fproxy will timeout and then I have to start again. And then it won't even
grab the parts it previously downloaded successfully So over a period of
weeks my perception is that I eventually move
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work at all
on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression
that you expect Freenet to require an academic university level of bandwidth
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 07:04:47AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
I *am* concerned when you express great surprise that Freenet will work
at all
on a 768/256 connection. (That was my take on it). I get the impression
that you expect Freenet to require an
On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:54:35PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As much as your bandwidth allows. On a capped 256/128 connection Freenet
managed to use 1.5GB in a day. Now I have a 10GB cap, not good. Anyway,
that's the sort of transfer you can expect -
Different views on what's realistic? Will Freenet just be a US or bandwidth
rich countries project? The government in New Zealand has decided that
256/256 is the highest broadband speed that our telecom monomoply needs to
make available to competitors. :-(
128/128 is the fastest connection
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits
connection
(based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity).
You would want to adjust:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2004 at 07:20:23PM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
increased the storage to 1G, which
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits,
and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under
control. It works very well for those of us with monthly bandwidth caps.
It does?! I
Toad [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 11:10:01AM +, Wayne McDougall wrote:
There's lots of cool stuff with averaging limits, and immediate limits,
and gradual adjustment. Together with incoming being not directly under
control. It works very well for those of us with
Stephen P. Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I started a freenet node four days ago, using the default freenet.conf
settings, adjusted for being behind a firewall. A couple days later I
increased the storage to 1G, which required restarting fred. A couple
days after that I increased the
From: Wayne McDougall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I *think* that freenet.conf is set by default to assume as 256Kbits connection
(based on a rule of thumb of setting limits to half bandwidth capacity).
You would want to adjust:
inputBandwidthLimit=1250
and
outputBandwidthLimit=1250
13 matches
Mail list logo
