Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-03-01 Thread Jep
Dennis Nezic wrote: On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:20:03 +0100, Jep wrote: Matthew Toseland : On Thursday 24 Feb 2011 23:27:01 Nomen Nescio wrote: you have a right to know USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z3W QCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/ I'm only go

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-03-01 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Tue, 01 Mar 2011 14:20:03 +0100, Jep wrote: > Matthew Toseland : > > On Thursday 24 Feb 2011 23:27:01 Nomen Nescio wrote: > >> you have a right to know > >> > >> USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z3W > >> QCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/ > > > > I'm

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-03-01 Thread Jep
Matthew Toseland : On Thursday 24 Feb 2011 23:27:01 Nomen Nescio wrote: you have a right to know USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z3W QCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/ I'm only going to say this once. First off, it was nearly 5 years ago. Second

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-26 Thread Ray Jones
On 02/26/2011 01:11 PM, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote: > >> The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes. > On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be required for > smaller communities to run Freenet in order

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 21:11:20 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes. > > On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be > required for smaller communities to run

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-26 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On Saturday 26 February 2011 16:04:41 Dennis Nezic wrote: > The community-censorship idea proposed was retarded, yes. On the contrary, some form of community-based censorship can be required for smaller communities to run Freenet in order to keep a “clean” network (by whatever standards).

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-26 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 09:06:31 +0100, David ‘Bombe’ Roden wrote: > On Saturday 26 February 2011 01:01:34 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > > > USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z > > > 3WQCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/ > > I can't access this freesite. Despite ho

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-26 Thread David ‘Bombe’ Roden
On Saturday 26 February 2011 01:01:34 Dennis Nezic wrote: > > USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z > > 3WQCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/ > I can't access this freesite. Despite hours of trying. (Other freesites > seem to work fine.) That’s because an

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-25 Thread Dennis Nezic
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 00:27:01 +0100 (CET), Nomen Nescio wrote: > > you have a right to know > > USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z3WQCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/ I can't access this freesite. Despite hours of trying. (Other freesites seem to work f

Re: [freenet-support] attention users of both freenet networks

2011-02-24 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Thursday 24 Feb 2011 23:27:01 Nomen Nescio wrote: > > you have a right to know > > USK@1WZPo6qZmlCpi6rZWjtz~kig1gcpcnzh5drmqpW9L8Q,ksaFFDkSJfnOXB3ppYhQ2R14z3W > QCYxGqXNERCYcHD0,AQACAAE/wordsoftoad/-1/ I'm only going to say this once. First off, it was nearly 5 years ago. Second, I made it