Just tested again with 0.74.6:
If I disable for example the last rule on WAN interface in the
GUI, the error appears. After enabeling the rule again,
the error stays
Scott Ullrich schrieb:
> I havent tested a Embedded image (remember its second rate citizen in
> pfSense). The PC version work
Same on 0.74.8...
> Just tested again with 0.74.6:
>
> If I disable for example the last rule on WAN interface in the
> GUI, the error appears. After enabeling the rule again,
> the error stays
>
> Scott Ullrich schrieb:
>
>>I havent tested a Embedded image (remember its second rate citizen
Hi,
Am having some problems with the Traffic Shaper Wizzard
on 0.73.8.
At the final stage of the wizzard when the changes are
applied we see a page of PHP error message which is
quickly replaced by an empty pfSense webpage.
The PHP Errors -
No source address found in rule No destination addres
Hi,
Am having some problems with the Traffic Shaper Wizzard
on 0.73.8.
At the final stage of the wizzard when the changes are
applied we see a page of PHP error message which is
quickly replaced by an empty pfSense webpage.
The PHP Errors -
No source address found in rule No destination addres
David and List,
I,too have not been able to do a harddrive install on my Dell Dimension XPS
R300 since V 0.63 or so.(Last version that the installer functioned properly)
That version had a bug with DHCP Client on the WAN Interface. I get Kernel
Page Faults about 50% of the install will all later Li
That version had bugs. Upgrade to the latest.
Scott
On 8/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Am having some problems with the Traffic Shaper Wizzard
> on 0.73.8.
>
> At the final stage of the wizzard when the changes are
> applied we see a page of PHP error message
Hello,
I seem to be having some issues installing pfsense with at least the 4 last iso
images. After typing installer, there is a brief blue screen (not long enough to
see what it says) and then the system reboots. Nothing is installed. I have
tried this with 4 different PCs and a few different bu
This has been reported before but I have not been able to reproduce the problem.
Scott
On 8/11/05, Yves Fortin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I seem to be having some issues installing pfsense with at least the 4 last
> iso
> images. After typing installer, there is a brief blue scree
On 8/10/05, Giorgio Ducci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi to all,
> I installed 0.74.6 on a 1E Wrap board. Some minor bugs:
> - on "Interfaces==>OPT1(Atheros wireless) the "Hide SSID" option is missed?!
Option was removed. It hides the SSID from the end user and does not
hide the SSID from wirele
Sorry if it has already been asked...
I am running 0.73.6, and in lan interface setup I see I can brigde it
with my wan interf. This is exactly what I am looking for (I want to
build a transparent proxy that scans http and pop3 traffic for virus),
but I can not understand how the bridge setup work
On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry if it has already been asked...
>
> I am running 0.73.6, and in lan interface setup I see I can brigde it with
> my wan interf. This is exactly what I am looking for (I want to build a
> transparent proxy that scans http and pop3 t
Just a little problem:
I enabled the serial port for accessing via null-modem cable.. Nothing happens. And I stil cannot access.
In the process list I cannot see any console enabled.
I am using 0.73.6
Tom
Not at all. It's a brand new option that I commited.
Cool! I was thinking to modify the source, because I was needing it!
You can assign an IP to either of them. Note that if you do notassign an IP to the LAN subnet you need to access the WebConfigurator
from the WAN which will require rules t
On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Oh, I did not try to save my LAN configuration leaving the IP field blank..
> eh eh
> When I enable this option, does dhcp server changes his configuration
> automatically, or do I have to change it by hands?
As always you need to upda
> Can I modify filter.inc, in order to include web access from WAN when> bridging is enabled? Are you interested in it?
Huh!? Just add a firewall rule permitting traffic to the webGUI port.
I was thinking that a new rule should be inserted automatically when you save, if anti-lockout is enabled..
On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was thinking that a new rule should be inserted automatically when you
> save, if anti-lockout is enabled..
I'm not sure this is a good idea. This would allow anyone from the
WAN in. Besides, how is it gonig to know what to unlock si
I'm in the same boat as well on Dell GX 110's. I have followed the 'upgrade
solution' of installing 0.68.x and upgrading from there.
> -Original Message-
> From: William Pflaumer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 7:11 AM
> To: David Strout
> Cc: support@pfsense.c
We are working on this. Everyone please be patient. The installer
is a tricky piece to get right for such a broad range of hardware and
such.
Scott
On 8/11/05, Wesley Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in the same boat as well on Dell GX 110's. I have followed the 'upgrade
> solution' o
All, are you using SCSI by chance?
Scott
On 8/11/05, Wesley Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in the same boat as well on Dell GX 110's. I have followed the 'upgrade
> solution' of installing 0.68.x and upgrading from there.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: William Pflaumer [ma
I did a little digging on the FreeBSD, FreeSBIE and DragonFLY sites and found little or not relavant info, but I did a couple of Googles and found some pertinant info ... seems there is some known issues w/ installing *BSDs w/ the CD in a different IDE channel than the HDD that you are installing
We're hot on the trail now.I bet your using SCSI?
Scott
On 8/11/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I did a little digging on the FreeBSD, FreeSBIE and DragonFLY sites and
> found little or not relavant info, but I did a couple of Googles and found
> some pertinant info ... seems
I am glad that the issue is being looked at. Let me know what you need from
me in terms of errors. Thanks.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:01 PM
> To: Wesley Joyce
> Cc: William Pflaumer; David Strout; support@pfsen
There is a SCSI PCI adapter in the GX260 but I have tried installing the ISO wo/ it installed ... saddly enough same results.--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC- Original Message -Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] ISO problems ... stillFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECT
I was not at first and then I switched to a SCSI controller and SCSI HD to
see if that helped. It did not.
Sorry, I installed 0.67.8 then upgradeed to the latest 0.7x version.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:54 PM
I just tried a fresh 0.74.6 install after pulling the AHA2940 SCSI adapter out same results. Hangs on the "Waiting for Backend" ANSI screen.--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC- Original Message -Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] ISO problems ... stillFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To
Try running:
/usr/local/bin/lua50c51 /usr/local/share/dfuibe_lua/main.lua \
dir.root=/FreeSBIE/ \
option.booted_from_install_media=true
... From a shell prompt. Do you get a lua error?
Scott
On 8/11/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just tried a fresh 0.74.6 install a
I am going to try the latest ISO with a GX110 using the IDE HD and then SCSI
and let you guys know.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 3:00 PM
> To: David Strout
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; support@pfsense
If it fails it would also be helpful to try running:
/usr/local/bin/lua50c51 /usr/local/share/dfuibe_lua/main.lua \
dir.root=/FreeSBIE/ \
option.booted_from_install_media=true
... From a shell prompt to see if any lua errors kick up.
Scott
On 8/11/05, Wesley Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
I'm not sure this is a good idea. This would allow anyone from the
WAN in. Besides, how is it gonig to know what to unlock since it used
the LAN subnet prior?
If I understood well, if I enable lan to wan bridging, and I do not
assign an IP to LAN interface, I can only access from the WAN ip. But
On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I understood well, if I enable lan to wan bridging, and I do not assign
> an IP to LAN interface, I can only access from the WAN ip. But if I did not
> create a rule before this change, I lock myself out, is it right?
Yes.
> If so, w
> If so, why not add an option, just to permit webconsole access only to> connection coming fron the lan interface?
Because if there is no IP on the lan what is there to surf into?
Directly to the ip assigned to wan interface...
I am coming from Linux, I hope I am not missing something because o
Correct. Which now brings us round circle to why you have to add a
rule for the WAN if there is no LAN ip to access to administrate the
box.
On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > > If so, why not add an option, just to permit webconsole access only to
> > > connecti
Sorry, but with PF is it possible to discriminate between an access
from a particular interface? If so, I think it is more secure to give
webconsole access only to connection coming from the "secure "
interface... Am I wrong?
On 8/11/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Correct. Which now
Not if there isn't a IP.
On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, but with PF is it possible to discriminate between an access from a
> particular interface? If so, I think it is more secure to give webconsole
> access only to connection coming from the "secure " interface
ok, this is my fault: in linux (kernel 2.6) with ebtables (or
arptables) it is possible to select an interface for inbound
connection, even in a bridged configuration.
Sorry for my ignoranceOn 8/11/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Not if there isn't a IP.On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donat
David, You are definately on to something with the IDE channels. I
have PFsense running just fine on my production box (Compaq) but I
have been having a heck of a time getting it installed on a particular
test machine (white box). I then started playing with FreeBSD, PC-BSD
and DesktopBSD and none
It could be possible but this all gets really hairy and sticky. Same
reason that its most likely no doable in m0n0wall in the first place.
There is a real chance of shooting yourself in the foot in this
configuration so consider yourself warned :)
Scott
On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL P
On 8/11/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It could be possible but this all gets really hairy and sticky. Same
> reason that its most likely no doable in m0n0wall in the first place.
> There is a real chance of shooting yourself in the foot in this
> configuration so consider yoursel
On 8/11/05, Kerry Schrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David, You are definately on to something with the IDE channels. I
> have PFsense running just fine on my production box (Compaq) but I
> have been having a heck of a time getting it installed on a particular
> test machine (white box). I then
DesktopBSD actually doesn't use BSDInstaller. So that's most likely
going to change the equation.
On 8/11/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/11/05, Kerry Schrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > David, You are definately on to something with the IDE channels. I
> > have PFsense r
I've posted a new iso. 0.75 will be copying slowly to the mirrors.
Please give this a try.
Scott
On 8/11/05, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> DesktopBSD actually doesn't use BSDInstaller. So that's most likely
> going to change the equation.
>
> On 8/11/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL
Okay gentlemen, using pfSense-LiveCD-0.74.8 and a single Dell GX110
running the latest BIOS (version A09) with an Adaptec 2940UW adapter and an
18GB Seagate Barracuda drive, I could
1. Not install to the SCSI HDD when the CDROM was on the secondary
bus as a master device.
2. I co
Okay, 0.75 installed fine as well to the
SCSI HD with the CDROM as a primary master.
My guess that there is a large file or
directory being copied right around the 50, 53% completion point and not enough
data wasn’t making it between the two buses?
From: Wesley Joy
So the problem is fixed now in 0.75?
Scott
On 8/11/05, Wesley Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Okay, 0.75 installed fine as well to the SCSI HD with the CDROM as a primary
> master.
>
>
>
> My guess that there is a large file or directory being copied right around
> th
Maybe this is the problem with Virtual Server 2005 SP0 as well? The
default is to have the CDROM virtual device as the secondary master...
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:39 PM
To: We
On 8/11/05, Dimitri Rodis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe this is the problem with Virtual Server 2005 SP0 as well? The
> default is to have the CDROM virtual device as the secondary master...
Worth a shot!
Scott
-
To unsubsc
The workaround works. I haven't tried with the CDROM on the secondary bus
yet.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:39 PM
> To: Wesley Joyce
> Cc: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] ISO problems ... stil
On 8/11/05, Wesley Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The workaround works. I haven't tried with the CDROM on the secondary bus
> yet.
So basically 0.75 does not fix the problem but the moving of the CDROM
to another bus does?
Scott
--
Yup, that did it.
All I did was move the CDROM from Secondary Master to Primary Slave and
the install went right thru. This was on 0.73.8.
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 2:55 PM
To: Di
On 8/11/05, Dimitri Rodis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, that did it.
>
> All I did was move the CDROM from Secondary Master to Primary Slave and
> the install went right thru. This was on 0.73.8.
Okay thanks. Let me see if this can help us narrow down the problem.
Scott
---
So... you all say that it is better to leave the things as they are.. Ok, I trust you.
But in the remote possibility that I become crazy and start to develope
something like the thing I imagined, I will share it with you! On 8/11/05, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On 8/11/05, Scott Ullri
Just a minor WEBGUI bug.
Ok, now I installed the 0.74.8 on a 1E Wrap board. Now the Atheros
OPT1 works fine, and it appears in "Status==>Interfaces" as
"associated" and I can connect from my laptop in wireless. On the
other hand (?) the WAN interface, which is up and running in dhcp with
an IP addr
Ok, I can second Dimitri. Moving the CD from Secondary Master to
Primary Slave did the trick for me as well. On both pfSense on
DesktopBSD. Haven't done FreeBSD or PCBSD yet but this looks
promising.
Dimitri, what hardware are you running?
I'm...
MSI K7T Pro2
Duron 1.2
256 - PC2700
Maxtor 6L040J2
Hrm..I've got a GX110 sitting on my desk here that I installed FreeBSD
on just fine. If I can dig up another HD, I'll try the install on it.
--Bill
On 8/11/05, Wesley Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm in the same boat as well on Dell GX 110's. I have followed the 'upgrade
> solution' of in
On 8/11/05, Tommaso Di Donato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So... you all say that it is better to leave the things as they are.. Ok, I
> trust you.
> But in the remote possibility that I become crazy and start to develope
> something like the thing I imagined, I will share it with you!
>
well no
I can't say the same here ..I've tried the following ..pri master = 10GB HDDpri slave = emptysec master = emptysec slave = Samsung CD-ROMNOT WORKING !! Still hangs on the "Waiting for Backend"Next I tried .pri master = 10GB HDDpri slave = emptysec master = Samsung CD-ROMsec slave = emp
On 8/11/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can't say the same here ..
> I've tried the following ..
>
> pri master = 10GB HDD
> pri slave = empty
> sec master = empty
> sec slave = Samsung CD-ROM
>
> NOT WORKING !! Still hangs on the "Waiting for Backend"
>
> Next I tried .
I am running Microsoft Virtual Server 2005 SP0 on Windows XP, so
whatever virtual hardware it emulates is what I'm running :)
Dimitri Rodis
Integrita Systems LLC
-Original Message-
From: Kerry Schrantz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 5:02 PM
To: Scott Ullrich
Did I miss a post or are the traffic graphs still not working w/ 0.74.8I have the current SVG 3.0.3 plug-in running w/ IE 6--David L. StroutEngineering Systems Plus, LLC
That is a correct statement at this point. Today (Friday), I will test 0.75
with the CDROM on the secondary bus and post the results.
> -Original Message-
> From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005 6:02 PM
> To: Wesley Joyce
> Cc: support@pfsense.com
https?
--Bill
On 8/11/05, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Did I miss a post or are the traffic graphs still not working w/ 0.74.8
>
> I have the current SVG 3.0.3 plug-in running w/ IE 6
> --
> David L. Strout
> Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
>
>
-
You’re kidding right!? I was able
to get it to work with your last scenario and 0.74.8. I will be trying 0.75
today (Friday)
H.. how about trying a new IDE cable.
From: David Strout
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 11, 2005
10:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROT
0.75.1 is making its way to a mirror near you to fix a Lua bug.
Scott
On 8/12/05, Wesley Joyce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> You're kidding right!? I was able to get it to work with your last scenario
> and 0.74.8. I will be trying 0.75 today (Friday)
>
>
>
> H.. how about
David Strout wrote:
I can't say the same here ..
I've tried the following ..
pri master = 10GB HDD
pri slave = empty
sec master = empty
sec slave = Samsung CD-ROM
NOT WORKING !! Still hangs on the "Waiting for Backend"
Next I tried .
pri master = 10GB HDD
pri slave = empty
sec mast
On 8/12/05, Scott Muller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have vague recollections of having to disable ACPI on to get some
> installs to work. (On a Dell I think!) Maybe that is worth trying as well.
See http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BootOptions for more info
on disabling ACPI.
Scott
--
Title: Ping issue
Has anyone ever noticed a little issue with using "ping" behind the latest version of monowall (as in 1.2b9)?
(I haven't tried it with pfSense yet, still testing it in a Virtual Server environment)
Example:
Host A - computer on LAN segment behind monowall
Ip= 192.168.0
66 matches
Mail list logo
