Chris Buechler wrote:
Rainer Duffner wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
Same as m0n0wall. Enabled filtering on bridges.
The old version didn't need this switch - what is switched off
(or on) by it?
Can I still do NAT for other optional interfaces when I enable it?
How it should work is
I'm getting error below when building embedded...image builds and boots but to amnesiac mode because it can't find config.xml or mount
Any ideas?
=== acpi_video (clean) Cloning /usr/local/pfsense-fs to /usr/local/pfsense-clone Deleting files listed in
Hi,
While trying to build from cvs checkout of pfSense, I came across these lines in
cvsup_current script. But the /current directory seems missing (or is it that I am missing
some thing?).
cp /current/src/sys/geom/label/g_label_ufs.c
/usr/src/sys/geom/label/g_label_ufs.c
# Complicate
mkdir /current cvsup current-supfile should get that fixed.
On 3/15/06, Rajkumar S [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
While trying to build from cvs checkout of pfSense, I came across these lines
in
cvsup_current script. But the /current directory seems missing (or is it that
I am missing
Has anybody come up with a clever alias-naming-scheme?
I feel I need to come up with some sort of policy before things get
totally out-of control here ;-)
I'd like to use something like:
Aliases:
hostInt|ExtCustomerShortnameHostnamespec
Hostnamespec: [VPS]Hostname
port:
Turns out the company I ordered the 3054MP+ Aries 2 cards was shipped
the 3054MP+ cards by their vendor instead of the Aries 2 cards. The
Aries 2 is an Atheros card, but the card I received is a PRISM GT card.
Love the fact Senao has two products with very similar names but totally
different
Generally a bad CF card
From: Tim Chapins
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 March 2006 13:38
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support]
embedded image fstab error during build
I'm getting error below when building embedded...image builds and boots
but to
Thanks Alan..but the fstab error is on my build machine with hard disk
And config.xml error is on wrap board with cf card
The two are related and I think if I solve fstab issue on build machine it will correct config.xml issue on wrap
On 3/15/06, alan walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in the whypfsensesucks page I've read this:
FTP on multi-wans do not work w/ the FTP helper.
does that mean I cannot configure incoming ftp connections? or does it
mean I can only configure incoming ftp with one WAN interface?
Thanks
Paul.
It means FTP is limited to the primary wan connection.
Userland daemons in FreeBSD are not multi-wan capable. We achieve
multi-wan status by using route-to and reply-to features of PF which
basically forces us to not have multi-wan support on the ftp helper
which is userland driven.
On
so maybe I've got my wires crossed (I hope)
is the ftp helper a daemon?
I already have an FTP server, and I want dnat WAN(n) - ftp server
so:
inet--wan1--ftp server
ftp server --wan1--inet
or
inet--wan2--ftp server
ftp server--wan2--inet
Thanks for your help BTW :)
Paul.
Scott Ullrich
Yes, the FTP helper is a daemon and therefore is only capable of doing
the primary WAN.
On 3/15/06, Paul W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
so maybe I've got my wires crossed (I hope)
is the ftp helper a daemon?
I already have an FTP server, and I want dnat WAN(n) - ftp server
so:
inet--wan1--ftp
i'm replacing our pix with a couple pfsense boxes, and we have some
internal LAN ip's that are statically mapped to the dmz, e.g. - our DMZ
mail server routes mail to a DMZ address that's mapped to an internal
address
I'm not sure how to set this up with pfsense, I figure in PF it would be
done
Hi All,
I have now managed to get working DUAL WAN (partially), so far its not a
fail over Link.
I am having an issue with no DNS to resolve names when WAN goes down.
Will allowing full inbound NAT to the opt interface allow the use of my
ISP’s DNS pool?
OR
Do I have to setup Dynamic DNS
On 3/15/06, Peter Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been asked to setup a couple of pfsense boxes as a high-availability
pair, using CARP. One problem is that only 5 public IP addresses are
available for the site and 4 are needed to access servers on the DMZ.
Do all four need high
And in what cases should each of these virtual IPs be used?
I have been mucking around with a multi wan subnets setup it seems
to be quite a common thread on the mailing list. If I could get some definitive
answers I would be happy to write a small howto
Thanks very much, Simon.
Thanks for the advise.
On Thursday 16 March 2006 02:53, Bill Marquette wrote:
On 3/15/06, Peter Curran [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been asked to setup a couple of pfsense boxes as a
high-availability pair, using CARP. One problem is that only 5 public IP
addresses are available for the
17 matches
Mail list logo
