RE: [pfSense Support] dnsmasq and bind views

2006-05-28 Thread Holger Bauer
Not sure I get this right but are you trying to use the dns forwarder to resolve IPs for the outside world? It's meant to serve internal hosts only and delivers the internal IP of the LAN adress. If I got you wrong please describe your setup a bit more. Holger -Original Message-

Re: [pfSense Support] dnsmasq and bind views

2006-05-28 Thread Bill Marquette
Why are you sending DNS queries from the outside world to dnsmasq? Shouldn't these be forwarded to your bind server so that the world view gets matched instead of your internal view? --Bill On 5/27/06, Paul Willard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got a dns server locally which uses views. from

Re: [pfSense Support] dnsmasq and bind views

2006-05-28 Thread Paul W
tracked down the problem. I had an error in my rules which caused them not to load. With no rules loaded the dnsmasq was forwarding requests from the out side worl. All fixed on to my next problem :) (se next email) Paul. Bill Marquette wrote: Why are you sending DNS queries from

[pfSense Support] static routes

2006-05-28 Thread Paul W
Can somebody explain how to use static route I want to static route everything to a certain IP out via opt1 in the linux world route add 210.55.105.82 gw 203.96.212.1 how do I do this in pfsense? is the interface field the out interface or the in interface? Paul.

Re: [pfSense Support] static routes

2006-05-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 5/28/06, Paul W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can somebody explain how to use static route I want to static route everything to a certain IP out via opt1 in the linux world route add 210.55.105.82 gw 203.96.212.1 how do I do this in pfsense? is the interface field the out interface or the in

Re: [pfSense Support] static routes

2006-05-28 Thread Paul W
yeah I can see that. what I'm asking is what does the interface field mean? Scott Ullrich wrote: On 5/28/06, Paul W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Can somebody explain how to use static route I want to static route everything to a certain IP out via opt1 in the linux world route add

Re: [pfSense Support] static routes

2006-05-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 5/28/06, Paul W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: yeah I can see that. what I'm asking is what does the interface field mean? It is for directly reachable type of situations. You most likely don't want this option. - To

Re: [pfSense Support] static routes

2006-05-28 Thread Paul W
I don't see how I can avoid it? quote follows from system-static routes (lynx) System: Static Routes: Edit route Interface [LAN_] Choose which interface this route applies to. Destination network / [32] Destination network for this static route Gateway

Re: [pfSense Support] static routes

2006-05-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
We do not have multi-path routing in FreeBSD. No ticket is required this works as it should. Enter the next hop gateway for whatever route you require and it should just work. On 5/28/06, Volker Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon 29 May 2006 08:41:07 NZST +1200, Paul W wrote: Can

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-28 Thread Gary Buckmaster
I suspect he's seeing clamav-freshclam running which should happen by default 5 times a day. This is, of course, configurable in the configuration file. Oh, and should ClamAV always be running. Mine runs for a little while and then shuts down. I don't know if this is normal. clamd

Re: [pfSense Support] static routes

2006-05-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
On 5/28/06, Volker Kuhlmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We do not have multi-path routing in FreeBSD. ?? Multi-wan support is handled by PF, not by the kernel routing table. Hence the reason multi-wan doesnt work on userland processes such as squid, etc.

Re: [pfSense Support] static routes

2006-05-28 Thread Paul W
Perfect . .thank you It appears to be the in interface. You should open a bug report for the help text of System-Static Routes, because it's not saying that. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional

Re: [pfSense Support] port forwarding

2006-05-28 Thread Scott Ullrich
It would be helpful to show the firewall rule permitting this trafic as well. On 5/28/06, Paul W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I seem to be having difficulty adding a port forward :( from WAN -lan(192.168.1.3) port 80 I've included 1. lynx screen shot of nat rule 2. syslog output showing the block

Re: [pfSense Support] port forwarding

2006-05-28 Thread Volker Kuhlmann
I seem to be having difficulty adding a port forward :( from WAN -lan(192.168.1.3) port 80 The macmini can get to the outside world is there any other debugging I can look at? I had some trouble to, coming from Linux. The thing to keep in mind is that the port forwarding happens before(!)

[pfSense Support] Re: trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode

2006-05-28 Thread Molle Bestefich
Chris Buechler wrote: This isn't something I have the time to work on right now, but I'll give you as many pointers as I can (which isn't much when it comes to kernel debugging) if you want to dig into it. Thanks! Scott built this iso for debugging an issue on a Dell 2850 server, but it

Re: [pfSense Support] port forwarding

2006-05-28 Thread Paul W
yes it did help .. thanks rules updated, and everything works as expected sweet. now to figure out outgoing load balancing :P HTH, Volker - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail:

Re: [pfSense Support] HAVP

2006-05-28 Thread Rajkumar S
Gary Buckmaster wrote: I suspect he's seeing clamav-freshclam running which should happen by default 5 times a day. This is, of course, configurable in the configuration file. I haven't enabled clamav-freshclam also, I am running freshclam from cron. Let me check that out. raj Oh, and