To add a few cents .. in my experience collisions are usually
attributable in decreasing order to:
1) Faulty ( Bent ) cable,
2) Dicky Transceiver (hit by static or lightning )
3) Chipset (Thomas Conrad especially, but others are notorious for
interframe spacing issues like older Intels )
4) Swit
I'm sorry to keep bringing this up but maybe this will help someone out
later. Again, the AP interface was originally bridged to the LAN
interface. I did this because I wanted my server 2k3 box to be the only
dhcp server on the network. But, for testing, I took down the bridge and
let pfsense d
Assign it a static IP inside your LAN subnet as you probably need to configure
it for wireless settings from time to time. Make sure this IP is not
conflicting with the DHCP-Server-Range you have configured at the pfSense.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL
Yeah I have tried once. Seems to conflict. DO I need to assign the router an
IP? set to static or DHCP? Or just to obtain an IP AUTO...I'm trying to get
the WIFI to a higher ground so that the WIFI has a larger range. Seems to
work better that way. Also do you think that I should get a new modem? I
You can use a wireless router as switch/AP. Just make sure it has a non
conflicting IP, DHCP is turned off and only connect stations to the LAN side.
Leave the WAN unplugged (pfSense uplink goes into LAN of the wifirouter, not
WAN).
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Spiker [ma
I have a broadband connection, Super fast. That is one of the issues. You
think that this is normal. Then connection is used all day. Torrents, email,
webserver. For pc's..Also this has nothing to do with pfsense .does anyone
know about using a wireless router as a switch and using it for the
wire
I also have a router that is on my workbench that is acting as a
wireless client and it is also giving the same problems. I live in the
middle of 3 acres in a very small town so I know there is no other AP's
in distance. There is really nothing else here that causes a problem.
When I turn my ol
Depends on how much he's using the link :) If he's full throttle p2p
on a decent bandwidth broadband connection a 10mbit half duplex
interface will quickly build up a LOT of collisions.
--Bill
On 6/24/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Actually that sounds too high for my taste ;-)
>
Actually that sounds too high for my taste ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 1:49 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
>
>
> Hey
>
> Yeah I understand what you are
On 6/24/06, Yuri Lukin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there an embedded version of RC1 available? I looked on the mirrors
but only see the Full version. If not then is there a timeline for the
embedded release?
ftp://reflection.ncsa.uiuc.edu/pub/pfSense/downloads/pfSense-1.0-RC1a-Embedded.img.gz
Hey
Yeah I understand what you are saying and right my uptime id 1 day,
08:04...the 10baseT/UTP wan side has 152710 collisions .Don't really slow
down the network. I just don't like it. Thanks for all the help.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT
Scott Ullrich wrote ..
> No, sorry. Look for the new snapshot that will be posted today in
> http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT-06-24-2006/
Is there an embedded version of RC1 available? I looked on the mirrors
but only see the Full version. If not then is there a timeline for th
On 6/24/06, Steve Spiker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello Holger,
Once again I wanted to say thanks. the reconfiguration works. I no
longer have errors with the traffic shaper. I just changed one setting
seemed to work.Im going to call my isp and demand a new modem. Does great I
just don
Sounds like noise to me. Check out your neighbourhood for interfering channels
(you can do so for example by scanning with http://netstumbler.com/ for other
accesspoint). Also other devices can interfere with wireless that won't be
listed with netstumbler (like for example wireless home video tr
Collisions are usually not a problem unless they start to freak out. As
collisions are detected the package will be resent. As you have 10 mbit/s
between your pfsense and the modem and might most likely have a less bandwidth
from ysour modem to your ISP there is enough room to resend a broken pa
Well, apparantly that didn't fix it completely. I can no longer get an
IP from the wireless. Again, the AP connects fine but dhcp will not
give me an IP. I tried with my laptop and it didn't work then i moved
it closer and it gave me an address so I'm assuming is a range issue.
However everythi
Hello Holger,
Once again I wanted to say thanks. the reconfiguration works. I no
longer have errors with the traffic shaper. I just changed one setting
seemed to work.Im going to call my isp and demand a new modem. Does great I
just don't want them collisions. SO they have to give me a new
It autonegotiates the connection with the opposite end (your modem). Looks like
your modem at WAN only can do 10baseT/UTP which is 10 mbit/s halfduplex. In
that case you will see some collisions from time to time. In case it's a
complete mismatch (one end runs other settings like the other) you
Hello Holger,
Thanks for the response. There are no hubs. Any reason why almost
the same dlink card used for the wan and lan why one of them would be 10/100
and the other not full duplex? This is the wan it is again a dlink card that
says 10baseT/UTP.This card is not much different than th
On 6/24/06, Jonathan Woodard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, I am able to get an IP with the desktop now so I would assume that
fixed it. I would still like to know what was happening but if no one
knows I'll be happy it works for now. :-)
thanks for the quick help Scott.
Let's just say there
Well, I am able to get an IP with the desktop now so I would assume that
fixed it. I would still like to know what was happening but if no one
knows I'll be happy it works for now. :-)
thanks for the quick help Scott.
Jonathan
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 6/24/06, Ispánovits Imre <[EMAIL PROTECTE
On 6/24/06, Ispánovits Imre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 14:50:39 -0400
"Scott Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We recently fixed a number of wireless issues, please run cvs_sync.sh
> releng_1 from a shell.
>
Can the above be applied on embedded version as well?
No, sor
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 14:50:39 -0400
"Scott Ullrich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We recently fixed a number of wireless issues, please run cvs_sync.sh
> releng_1 from a shell.
>
Can the above be applied on embedded version as well?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On 6/24/06, Jonathan Woodard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I know my saga with wireless the last few weeks might be getting old to
some but anyways I'm having issues.
I have my main router with a wireless card in AP mode bridged to my LAN.
I have 2 pc's, one a desktop with a "b" card and the other
I know my saga with wireless the last few weeks might be getting old to
some but anyways I'm having issues.
I have my main router with a wireless card in AP mode bridged to my LAN.
I have 2 pc's, one a desktop with a "b" card and the other is my laptop
with a "g" card. My laptop can connect fi
In case you have a hub somewhere or a link that is not full duplex collisions
are likely. Switches shouldn't cause collisions, hubs can do and with rising
traffic the collisions will rise too.
The error you see is a broken trafficshaper configuration. Did you touch the
config by hand? You shoul
Hello Pfsense support..
I Just wanted to know if anyone had an idea of why I get
some many collisions on my network. On one install I had over 700,000
collisions.
No I have only 138,792..this seems to gotten better
since I have replaced a switch an enet cable,
MY NETWORK IS a c
27 matches
Mail list logo
