Just wondering weather the freesbie2 cvs is available
again.
Would really like to make an embedded build on rc1
In the monowall docs on pptp it suggests that you can assign
a range of ip addresses to the pptp clients that is not part of the lan ip network
range, however if you do this that you can’t route the address range to
the wan – is there a way around this – i.e can you put this range
into the
the uplink to the pfSense goes into one of the lan ports of the wifirouter. the
wan ports will not be used of this router.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 6:55 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Su
You
can have the pptp users in a seperate subnet but it won't solve your conflict as
you then would still have the lan client in the same subnet and the remote
destination you now have to route to still will conflict. You can't add a route
to a remote subnet that is identical with your local
I have in the past used iptables on Debian. I have recently aquired
a wrap with pfsense on it.
Just trying to come to terms with the differences.
So if someone could help with some answers to questions I
haven’t been able to glean from the docs (references to parts of the docs
with
The default firewall configuration of pfSense is:
- LAN is allowed to go anywhere
- WAN everyting blocked
- OPTx everything blocked
When creating firewallrules you always allow traffic incoming at an interface.
This will create 2 states for the connection (in, out) which then both will be
allowe
On 7/2/06, Craig Silva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are there any example rule sets for a standard type firewall without the
default rule that allows all lan sourced traffic (if there is such a thing)
for a wan, lan and dmz type firewall?
That's certainly something we'd hoped people would do :)
On Sat, 1 Jul 2006 04:38:52 -0400, you wrote:
>On 7/1/06, dny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> can this applied into pfsense?
>> http://jazzz1s.blogspot.com/2006/05/blocking-p2p-protocols-with-openbsd.html
>
>Yes it appears so.
>
>I didn't spend a lot of time on this so please don't quote me, I am
>j
We had ntop installed but to some reasons we uninstalled it. Now the question why is Ntop still generating logs and running as a process (see below)?
thanks!!
Jul 3 07:09:09
ntop[977]: THREADMGMT[t161820672]: RRD: Throughput data collection: Thread running [p977]
Jul 3 07:09:09
ntop[977]
On 7/3/06, Tunge2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We had ntop installed but to some reasons we uninstalled it. Now the question why is Ntop still generating logs and running as a process (see below)?
thanks!!
Jul 3 07:09:09
ntop[977]: THREADMGMT[t161820672]: RRD: Throughput data collection: Th
Can i remove the directory "/var/db/ntop" with the file
LsWatch.db dnsCache.db macPrefix.db prefsCache.dbaddressQueue.db fingerprint.db ntop_pw.db rrd
# pkg_delete -r `pkg_info | grep ntop | cut -f1 -d" "` && killall ntop (see below for the output)
===> post-deinstallation in
On 7/3/06, Tunge2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can i remove the directory "/var/db/ntop" with the file
LsWatch.db dnsCache.db macPrefix.db prefsCache.dbaddressQueue.db fingerprint.db ntop_pw.db rrd
# pkg_delete -r `pkg_info | grep ntop | cut -f1 -d" "` && killall ntop (see belo
12 matches
Mail list logo
