the uplink to the pfSense goes into one of the lan ports of the wifirouter. the 
wan ports will not be used of this router.

Holger

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 6:55 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> 
> 
> So my Pfsense LAN side had a 0.1 addy the wireless access my 
> linksys should
> get a static ip with in the .100-254 and will that go into 
> the WAN or the
> LAN of the router and turn off dhcp.As long as I static the 
> Ip's one the lan
> side of that switch I should have no issues correct?? Thanks all for
> help....Steve
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 12:09 AM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> 
> Assign it a static IP inside your LAN subnet as you probably need to
> configure it for wireless settings from time to time. Make 
> sure this IP is
> not conflicting with the DHCP-Server-Range you have configured at the
> pfSense.
> 
> Holger
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 6:02 AM
> > To: support@pfsense.com
> > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > 
> > 
> > Yeah I have tried once. Seems to conflict. DO I need to 
> > assign the router an
> > IP? set to static or DHCP? Or just to obtain an IP AUTO...I'm 
> > trying to get
> > the WIFI to a higher ground so that the WIFI has a larger 
> > range. Seems to
> > work better that way. Also do you think that I should get a 
> > new modem? If
> > that will stop my collisions I think that I should. I would 
> > think as much $
> > as I pay my ISP that they should give me a 100mbit modem. 
> We will see.
> > Thanks you have went out of your way to try and help 
> me...Thanks once
> > again..Steve
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:38 PM
> > To: support@pfsense.com
> > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > 
> > You can use a wireless router as switch/AP. Just make sure it 
> > has a non
> > conflicting IP, DHCP is turned off and only connect stations 
> > to the LAN
> > side. Leave the WAN unplugged (pfSense uplink goes into LAN of the
> > wifirouter, not WAN). 
> > 
> > Holger
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 5:29 AM
> > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > I have a broadband connection, Super fast. That is one of the 
> > > issues. You
> > > think that this is normal. Then connection is used all day. 
> > > Torrents, email,
> > > webserver. For pc's..Also this has nothing to do with pfsense 
> > > .does anyone
> > > know about using a wireless router as a switch and using 
> it for the
> > > wireless?? If anyone can help I would love any info. I just 
> > > want to thank
> > > you all for helping me with these issues..yeah that is what I 
> > > was thinking
> > > that the collisions are still a little high..thanks.Steve
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Bill Marquette [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 8:02 PM
> > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > 
> > > Depends on how much he's using the link :)  If he's full 
> > throttle p2p
> > > on a decent bandwidth broadband connection a 10mbit half duplex
> > > interface will quickly build up a LOT of collisions.
> > > 
> > > --Bill
> > > 
> > > On 6/24/06, Holger Bauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Actually that sounds too high for my taste ;-)
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 1:49 AM
> > > > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > > > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hey
> > > > >
> > > > >       Yeah I understand what you are saying and right my
> > > > > uptime id 1 day,
> > > > > 08:04...the 10baseT/UTP wan side has 152710 collisions .Don't
> > > > > really slow
> > > > > down the network. I just don't like it. Thanks for 
> all the help.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >  Steve
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 7:32 PM
> > > > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > > > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > > >
> > > > > Collisions are usually not a problem unless they start to
> > > > > freak out. As
> > > > > collisions are detected the package will be resent. As you
> > > > > have 10 mbit/s
> > > > > between your pfsense and the modem and might most likely 
> > > have a less
> > > > > bandwidth from ysour modem to your ISP there is enough room
> > > > > to resend a
> > > > > broken package. Unless you are having issues you don't need
> > > > > to switch the
> > > > > modem. You also have to see that the collisioncounter 
> > > counts since the
> > > > > uptime and is nothing that shows collisions per 
> > > timeinterval. You can
> > > > > calculate how many collisions actually happen this way with
> > > > > your uptime.
> > > > > Might not be worth to fight with your ISP for a new modem.
> > > > >
> > > > > Holger
> > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 1:13 AM
> > > > > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hello Holger,
> > > > > >
> > > > > >     Once again I wanted to say thanks. the reconfiguration
> > > > > > works. I no
> > > > > > longer have errors with the traffic shaper. I just changed
> > > > > one setting
> > > > > > seemed to work.Im going to call my isp and demand a new
> > > > > > modem. Does great I
> > > > > > just don't want them collisions. SO they have to give me a
> > > > > > new modem. Or ill
> > > > > > get dsl through my work and get a static ip...Thanks once
> > > > > again. Steve
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 6:43 PM
> > > > > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > > > > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It autonegotiates the connection with the opposite end (your
> > > > > > modem). Looks
> > > > > > like your modem at WAN only can do 10baseT/UTP which is 
> > > 10 mbit/s
> > > > > > halfduplex. In that case you will see some collisions from
> > > > > > time to time. In
> > > > > > case it's a complete mismatch (one end runs other settings
> > > > > > like the other)
> > > > > > you will have pretty much collisions or up to (nearly) 
> > > not usable
> > > > > > connection. There are some hidden options to set mode for
> > > > > > pfSense but I
> > > > > > really recommend not using them as this might make 
> > > things work (see
> > > > > > 
> http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=10&id=38&a
> > > > > > rtlang=en&high
> > > > > > light=hidden ). I guess it's just yourmodem that can't do a
> > > > > > better mode.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Holger
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 12:22 AM
> > > > > > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello Holger,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >   Thanks for the response. There are no hubs. Any reason
> > > > > > > why almost
> > > > > > > the same dlink card used for the wan and lan why 
> one of them
> > > > > > > would be 10/100
> > > > > > > and the other not full duplex? This is the wan it 
> is again a
> > > > > > > dlink card that
> > > > > > > says 10baseT/UTP.This card is not much different 
> > than the lan
> > > > > > > dlink card
> > > > > > > witch it says is 100baseTX <full-duplex>.I'm still kind of
> > > > > > > confused by this
> > > > > > > all. Please explain. Also thanks for the help. The 
> > Only thing
> > > > > > > that I can
> > > > > > > think of is that my mode is a 10Mbps.Im writing 
> this from a
> > > > > > > remote location,
> > > > > > > When I get home I will try straight to a pc from the modem
> > > > > > > and see what
> > > > > > > speed it says that it is....Steve
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Holger Bauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 11:21 AM
> > > > > > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > > > > > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > In case you have a hub somewhere or a link that is 
> > > not full duplex
> > > > > > > collisions are likely. Switches shouldn't cause 
> collisions,
> > > > > > > hubs can do and
> > > > > > > with rising traffic the collisions will rise too.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The error you see is a broken trafficshaper configuration.
> > > > > > > Did you touch the
> > > > > > > config by hand? You should rerun the traffic shaper 
> > wizard to
> > > > > > > get a clean
> > > > > > > set again to start with. And also, make sure you 
> are on the
> > > > > > > latest version
> > > > > > > (which RC1 atm).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Holger
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Steve Spiker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 2:58 PM
> > > > > > > To: support@pfsense.com
> > > > > > > Subject: [pfSense Support] errors that im receiving
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hello Pfsense support..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I Just wanted to know if anyone had an idea of why I 
> > > get some many
> > > > > > > collisions on my network. On one install I had 
> over 700,000
> > > > > > > collisions.
> > > > > > > No I have only 138,792..this seems to gotten 
> better since I
> > > > > > > have replaced a
> > > > > > > switch an enet cable,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > MY NETWORK IS  a cable modem  then pfsense router wan and
> > > > > > > lan....Then switch
> > > > > > > across the building into another switch into a pc...Should
> > > > > > > two switches
> > > > > > > cause collisions??
> > > > > > > I'm working on getting the house wired for enet so I wont
> > > > > have there
> > > > > > > issues..
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Also I have another issue that im hoping that you can 
> > > help with ,,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > php: : There were error(s) loading the rules: queue
> > > > > > qOthersUpH already
> > > > > > > exists on interface rl1 /tmp/rules.debug:23: 
> errors in queue
> > > > > > > definition
> > > > > > > queue qOthersDownH already exists on interface rl0
> > > > > > > /tmp/rules.debug:24:
> > > > > > > errors in queue definition queue qOthersUpL already 
> > exists on
> > > > > > > interface rl1
> > > > > > > /tmp/rules.debug:25: errors in queue definition queue
> > > > > > > qOthersDownL already
> > > > > > > exists on interface rl0 /tmp/rules.debug:26: 
> errors in queue
> > > > > > > definition
> > > > > > > queue qOthersUpH already exists on interface rl1 queue
> > > > > qOthersUpH a
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > not sure what this meant, Well let me know if you 
> happen to
> > > > > > > know of any
> > > > > > > issues with this...Im guessing that the reason it says a
> > > > > > > 10mbps on the Wan
> > > > > > > because of my modem. Please feel free to write me back
> > > > > anytime......
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks for your time
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > ____________
> > > > > > > Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > ____________
> > > > > > Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > ____________
> > > > > Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > ____________
> > > > Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > > >
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > ____________
> > Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> ____________
> Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

____________
Virus checked by G DATA AntiVirusKit


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to