Am 18.08.2007 um 01:13 schrieb Sean Cavanaugh:
overall is there any benefit to pfsense to leaving ACPI on? seems
almost worth it to boot with it turned off and leave it as an
option to enable it voluntarily.
I think you might need it to boot some newer servers.
It's not all about therm
Thanks Sean,
Having googled a bit I am running up Kubuntu on an old box with wireshark. I
assume it will run without an IP assignment from the hub, using the NIC's
"promiscous mode"? (Probably no DHCP running and can't use my static IP!)
I appreciate the your directional overview, I will let
overall is there any benefit to pfsense to leaving ACPI on? seems almost
worth it to boot with it turned off and leave it as an option to enable it
voluntarily.
-Sean
- Original Message -
From: "Kyle Mott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 6:50 PM
Subject: Re: [pfS
http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/HOWTO_disable_acpi
-Kyle
Sean Cavanaugh wrote:
just change the config to boot with ACPI off by default. there are
instructions how to do this in the Wiki.
-Sean
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug
Local site has two WAN connections - one cable, one DSL from two
separate internet providers.
Remote site has one ISP connection.
Is it possible for pfSense to automatically failover a site-to-site
OpenVPN connection between the two sites?
Thanks,
Dave
--
just change the config to boot with ACPI off by default. there are instructions
how to do this in the Wiki.
-Sean
> Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 15:26:57 +0200> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> support@pfsense.com> Subject: [pfSense Support] Problem with IBM X335> > Hi
> all,> > i've just installed
I actually turned the "block private networks" off on mine because my ISP
passes a 192.168.x.x address when i initially apply for a DHCP, but if you get
a static IP, then its a non-issue. realistically, to truly find the absolute
reason, you would have to tcpdump on the modem and pfsense at the
Hans Rienecker wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i've just installed PFSense 1.01 on an IBM X335 (Intel Xeon 2.8 GHz 2.5 GB
> RAM) and i noticed that it take very long time to boot the system.
> It hangs for ca. 6 minutes showing a message "smp: AP CPU #1 Launched!" and
> then boots and is ready for use.
> Wh
Hi all,
i've just installed PFSense 1.01 on an IBM X335 (Intel Xeon 2.8 GHz 2.5 GB RAM)
and i noticed that it take very long time to boot the system.
It hangs for ca. 6 minutes showing a message "smp: AP CPU #1 Launched!" and
then boots and is ready for use.
When i boot with option 2 (Boot FreeB
Hi Sean
>> im really thinking it's a modem problem or something with the IP that is
>> assigned for pfsense WAN. the fact that you can ALWAYS hit the modems config
>> page even if internet access is unavailable kind of confirms it.
It does tend to suggest that maybe pfsense is not the problem,
im really thinking it's a modem problem or something with the IP that is
assigned for pfsense WAN. the fact that you can ALWAYS hit the modems config
page even if internet access is unavailable kind of confirms it. conecting
another computer to the modem, I'm taking it, would get a DHCP address
Hi Sean et al
Problem has recurred, I have done the following ping tests during the problem
condition:
I can ping from both LAN and WAN the WAN Static IP (a.b.c.123)
I can ping from both LAN and WAN the webserver on the Cable modem
(192.168.100.1)
I can not ping from both LAN and WAN the serve
12 matches
Mail list logo
