Hi
I have installed Untangle and PF together in the network
the flow looks like below
users-crosscableeth0(untangle-bridgemode)-eth1(croscable)eth1---PF---eth0--Internet
above setup works fine , with out any issue
but when i enable capitive portal
iam not able to access the login
QUESTION:
I've always assumed that Manual Outbound NAT rules are applied in the
top-to-bottom order they are listed via Firewall - NAT - Outbound but,
given some of the strange routing behaviors I get when I turn off some of
the WANs, I'm wondering whether that's a valid assumption ... is it/are
PROBLEM (see detailed CONFIGURATION INFO near bottom of posting):
Disabling interfaces on pfSense can cause permanent loss of ability to
connect to webConfigurator. Here's what's happening:
- I have a second/testing pfSense box configured almost identically to
the production one (only 6 ports
Its funny you should mention this as I am in the middle of doing exactly
the same thing with an ALIX board from
http://www.yawarra.com.au/hw-alix2.php
I installed the 2GB CF card in a card reader on my PC and booted off the
CD and installed pfSense onto the card.
I then inserted the card in
Hi,
For some time now I have been running monowall on a Wrap board on CF
without issues, however I came across some rather lovely features of
pfSense I would love to have, mainly:
* Support for my Wireless mini-pci card - Wiston
* Rule Schedules
* RDD Graphs
and more
However, after
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:31:29PM +1000, digger wrote:
The end result is I can confirm that the full version does happily run
on a CF card and ALIX board.
If this is a consumer flash device mounted r/w probability of failure
will go up considerably after half a year, or so.
Unfortunately,
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 13:53 +0200 schrieb Eugen Leitl:
If this is a consumer flash device mounted r/w probability of failure
will go up considerably after half a year, or so.
Unfortunately, there's no CF card with wear-levelling hardware as far
as I know. This is very different
It sounds like google.com is not resolving when you have captive portal
enabled. Make sure you have the DNS servers that are assigned to your users in
the list of allowed outbound IPs in captive portal.
Tim Nelson
Systems/Network Support
Rockbochs Inc.
(218)727-4332 x105
- Original
Heribert Tockner [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrito:
Am Donnerstag, den 24.07.2008, 13:53 +0200 schrieb Eugen Leitl:
If this is a consumer flash device mounted r/w probability of failure
will go up considerably after half a year, or so.
Unfortunately, there's no CF card with wear-levelling hardware
Hi guys!
Just wondering how to limit the session for each IP on PfSense 1.2? We do
have so many P2P traffics which are not able to completely blocked.
Many thanks!
Regards,
Aldo Chiu
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Aldo Chiu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys!
Just wondering how to limit the session for each IP on PfSense 1.2? We do
have so many P2P traffics which are not able to completely blocked.
Look under Advanced on each firewall rule.
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:53 AM, Eugen Leitl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 09:31:29PM +1000, digger wrote:
The end result is I can confirm that the full version does happily run
on a CF card and ALIX board.
If this is a consumer flash device mounted r/w probability of
re: I know there are a number of end users running full installs on CF and I
haven't heard of any of them killing a CF either.
Theoretically the card should die in less than a year
To me the card is not so likely as to die wholesale as it is to have sectors
die here and there. These
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
For some time now I have been running monowall on a Wrap board on CF without
issues, however I came across some rather lovely features of pfSense I would
love to have, mainly:
* Support for my Wireless mini-pci card -
Hi Chirs,
1. I have a Server called 'Max' - when adding this to the aliases
(as I have
prev done under mono) I would get an error on the reload of the
config :(
It would appear I am unable to add this host name as an alias. I
presume max
is a reserved word ? However the only workaround I
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Matt Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
In m0no:
Under NAT - OUTBOUND NAT I have the following entries.
INTERFACE - SOURCE - DESTINATION - TARGET - DESC
WAN - 192.168.102.3/32 - * - x.x.x.186 - Orion - .186
WAN - 192.168.102.10/32 - * - x.x.x.187 -
In m0no:
Under NAT - OUTBOUND NAT I have the following entries.
INTERFACE - SOURCE - DESTINATION - TARGET - DESC
WAN - 192.168.102.3/32 - * - x.x.x.186 - Orion - .186
WAN - 192.168.102.10/32 - * - x.x.x.187 - Pegasus - .187
WAN - 192.168.102.2/32 - * - x.x.x.188 - Max - .188
WAN -
17 matches
Mail list logo
