Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense 1.2-RELEASE: Performance Issue?

2008-08-01 Thread Paul Mansfield
Bill Marquette wrote: Here's a suggestion somewhat out of left field. What about MTU? Any chance the provider changed it on you? A machine right on the edge good point. maybe Ted can check he's not blocking MTU path discovery, and/or drop his MTU to, say, 1400?

[pfSense Support] IPv6

2008-08-01 Thread Ihsan Dogan
Hello, Are there any plans to improve the IPv6 support of pfSense? Ihsan -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog.dogan.ch/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [pfSense Support] PF and UT not working

2008-08-01 Thread Gary Buckmaster
ram wrote: On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a bridge mode, you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for management. If that is the case, I could

Re: [pfSense Support] IPv6

2008-08-01 Thread Gary Buckmaster
Ihsan Dogan wrote: Hello, Are there any plans to improve the IPv6 support of pfSense? Ihsan Currently none of the developers has an IPv6 network with which to do testing. There have been a number of queries on this subject, including a fairly long thread on this mailing list. For