ram wrote:
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Curtis LaMasters
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
This may have been beaten to death now but if UT is truely in a
bridge mode, you shouldn't need an IP address on it except for
management. If that is the case, I could change the IP of UT to
something in the private range and see if your issues clear up.
What is your internet connection. I am going to assume a cable or
DSL modem of some sort. What may be happeing is your cable modem
sees the IP of your PF box and the MAC of your UT box and somehow
not getting the rest of the ARP information.
Hi
yes as per the suggestion i have changed UT box IP to another range
for checking
but still i get authentication success, and takes lot of time to
resolve domain, and lost the connection.
I have Dedicated Internet, and own DNS Server in my network.
If i remove UT from network i can get all the things working perfect
with out any issue
but when i involve UT in bridge mode i am having this problem..
but when i add UT in bridge mode with CP, it works charm
but iam adding Pfsense in my network for loadbalance and failover and
capitive portal
since UT does not have capabilities to do the same job what iam looking
any suggestions or most welcome
ram
This thread has gone way past pfSense support and now into the realms of
UT support. Since the problem, at least from what we are able to
surmise from the small amount of substance in your posts, seems to be
entirely with UT, I'd encourage you to take up this conversation with
the UT community.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
