On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Erwan David
wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:30:44AM CET, Veiko Kukk
> said:
>> Erwan David wrote:
>>> It works great for me, in 1.2.1
>>
>> Do you have also load sharing or only failover?
>> How are your failover pools configured?
>>
>> ---
>> Veiko
>
> I hav
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 6:28 AM, Veiko Kukk wrote:
> Erwan David wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:30:44AM CET, Veiko Kukk
>> said:
>>>
>>> Do you have also load sharing or only failover?
>>> How are your failover pools configured?
>>>
>>> ---
>>> Veiko
>>
>> I have both.
>> 2 links, Wan an
According to Chris Buechler on Mon, 01/12/09 at 12:24:
>
> >Is this behaviour essential to pfSense? It doesn't seem like it would
> >be a FreeBSD requirement. Maybe a future enhancement to pfSense may make
> >multiple interfaces more "interchangeable" or "clone-like". What if my
> >sis0 interfa
According to Rainer Duffner on Mon, 01/12/09 at 12:12:
>
>
> FreeBSD6 had no support for lagg(4). Though I think it may have been
> MFCed to 6.4.
> FreeBSD7 has.
> Pfsense 1.2 was developed with FreeBSD6 in mind.
>
> I don't know - maybe pfSense 2.0 will have support for lagg(4)?
>
> I don't m
William Bulley wrote:
Is this behaviour essential to pfSense? It doesn't seem like it would
be a FreeBSD requirement. Maybe a future enhancement to pfSense may make
multiple interfaces more "interchangeable" or "clone-like". What if my
sis0 interface on my 4801 died (unlikely, to be sure). I
William Bulley schrieb:
> According to Chris Buechler on Mon, 01/12/09 at 11:44:
>
>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:36 AM, William Bulley wrote:
>>
>>> Second, I have one question:
>>>
>>> "How does one set (and save) a default route (as in "route add default
>>> 10.0.0.1")
>>> from with
According to Chris Buechler on Mon, 01/12/09 at 11:44:
>
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:36 AM, William Bulley wrote:
> >
> > Second, I have one question:
> >
> > "How does one set (and save) a default route (as in "route add default
> > 10.0.0.1")
> > from within pfSense?"
>
> On the WAN. The
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 8:36 AM, William Bulley wrote:
>
> First, thanks very much for the reply.
>
> Second, I have one question:
>
> "How does one set (and save) a default route (as in "route add default
> 10.0.0.1")
> from within pfSense?"
>
On the WAN. The WAN interface needs to be the o
Veiko Kukk wrote:
Hi!
I have tried everything i can imagine with no luck - upgraded to 1.2.1
(1.2.0 didnt work), made clean install and new configuration manually,
reading every dual wan document from wiki and forums, configured only
one router wih no carp interfaces...
Dual wan failover is j
Tim,
If that is it, I'm going to shoot myself. I'll check again tonight when I am
home. I've never used the PPTP server at home so my first instinct would be
no, it is not enabled, but who knows. Maybe I checked the box at one time, or
maybe someone else did (there is another admin in my web
Is the PPTP server enabled on the 'other' pfSense firewall where the clients
are connecting *FROM*? That may be your problem... see here:
http://www.pfsense.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=40&Itemid=43
'
Specifically this text:
Limitations
* Because of limitations in pf NAT, w
Tried putting an unused LAN IP in the server field, no difference
whatsoever. It gives me the same exact errors on the client side and in the
PFSense logs. Anything else I can try? Just as an FYI, the clients I am
testing with are XP Pro and Vista Ultimate. Both are behind another PFSense
firew
According to Chris Buechler on Sun, 01/11/09 at 18:24:
>
> Time for tcpdump to see what it is that's failing, and where. Run it
> on your ath0 interface and sis0, and see what's happening on the wire.
> Is ARP failing, or does that succeed and something else fails, or?
>
> That's exactly how I h
Erwan David wrote:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:30:44AM CET, Veiko Kukk
said:
Do you have also load sharing or only failover?
How are your failover pools configured?
---
Veiko
I have both.
2 links, Wan and opt1 interfaces.
I got it working the same way (with load balancer), but I'm not
int
Paul Mansfield wrote:
I just wanted to be certain that a reboot wasn't needed, it doesn't
*seem* to matter. My guess is that it's a display bug, not a functional bug?
Check the output of ifconfig to see the real state of carp interfaces.
--
Veiko
--
Veiko Kukk wrote:
> Paul Mansfield wrote:
>> I note that when I add a new carp interface on the master, when it gets
>> replicated to slave, the carp status page on the slave has a blank field
>> in the "carp interface" column of the table.
>>
>> is this a known bug?
>>
>> does it matter, or should
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:30:44AM CET, Veiko Kukk
said:
> Erwan David wrote:
>> It works great for me, in 1.2.1
>
> Do you have also load sharing or only failover?
> How are your failover pools configured?
>
> ---
> Veiko
I have both.
2 links, Wan and opt1 interfaces.
3 pools:
preferWan, gatew
Erwan David wrote:
It works great for me, in 1.2.1
Do you have also load sharing or only failover?
How are your failover pools configured?
---
Veiko
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional c
On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:13:24AM CET, Veiko Kukk
said:
> Hi!
>
> I have tried everything i can imagine with no luck - upgraded to 1.2.1
> (1.2.0 didnt work), made clean install and new configuration manually,
> reading every dual wan document from wiki and forums, configured only one
> rou
Hi!
I have tried everything i can imagine with no luck - upgraded to 1.2.1
(1.2.0 didnt work), made clean install and new configuration manually,
reading every dual wan document from wiki and forums, configured only
one router wih no carp interfaces...
Dual wan failover is just not working. Pl
Greetings,
I'm looking to buy 108Mbps Mini-PCI adapter, AR5006 - MicroTik R52H
but I'm not sure how well is this chip supported under pfsense.
Can anyone share his/hers experience of using this chipset?
--
Best Wishes,
Stefan Lambrev
ICQ# 24134177
21 matches
Mail list logo
