Hi
Is possible to make a GRE tunel between two Pfsenses without using IPsec?
I look in kldstat that gre module is not loaded
Thanks!
--
Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com
+34 94.404.81.82
---
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 5:21 AM, Mikel Jimenez wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is possible to make a GRE tunel between two Pfsenses without using IPsec?
>
Not with nor without, until 2.0.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
Hi folks,
I've got a captive portal deployed on a simple LAN/WAN configured
current PFsense box.
All clients that I want to have transparent access to the internet
have a MAC bypass entry.
All other clients authenticate against the active portal.
The mac-bypass has over 300 entries in it.
I ge
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 15:55, Tim Dressel wrote:
> 1. What is the limitation on the number of mac-bypass entries? And is
> what I am seeing expected with 300 entries?
I'm sure someone will chime in with the precise ipfw limitation, but
this is mostly going to be dependent on your system's perform
I was going to ask what hardware you were running this on. We have a
rather large list of MAC addresses in our captive portal and it works
fine. Its a dual opteron/4 gigs of ram. Probably overkill, so it
wont help you know what you need, but if your running 128 ram or even
256, its bare bo
It's a P4 2.something, 40gb disk, 1gb ram.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Chris Flugstad wrote:
> I was going to ask what hardware you were running this on. We have a rather
> large list of MAC addresses in our captive portal and it works fine. Its a
> dual opteron/4 gigs of ram. Probably
