On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Scott Ullrich wrote:
>
> In case there are no rules referring to the table:
>
Okay I get it. I was under the impression that there would always be a rule
referring to this table.
Thanks!
--
There are seven words in this sentence.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:27 AM, Tim A. wrote:
> I don't get it. Sure there's a lot of features people want to add. And the
> answer is typically, "2.0".
> But what is the major platform difference for this major revision?
> I just built HEAD (2.0 on 7_2) and... umm... I like 1.2.3, at least it
> w
Tim A. wrote:
apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
It was always my understanding that pfsense stability came before
features. I don't mind that, because i would rather have a product
that works 100% of the time, without the features i want. Rather then
a product that works 50% of the time, with
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:57 PM, Tim A. wrote:
> Sorry, not trying to discredit it. Just trying to understand it.
> I think the major difference is the CoreGUI2?
No. I don't think that ever got used in 2.0. That was the old HEAD
that was retired.
> From what I'm reading this is a major improvemen
apiase...@midatlanticbb.com wrote:
It was always my understanding that pfsense stability came before
features. I don't mind that, because i would rather have a product
that works 100% of the time, without the features i want. Rather then
a product that works 50% of the time, with all the featur
Hi Tebano,
Sorry for just reply now.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Tebano epaminonda <
l_epa_m_ino...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi!
> Sorry for html settings...
> --
> Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:17:20 +0100
> From: francisco.cabr...@gmail.com
> To: support@pfsense.com
>
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Tim A. wrote:
I don't get it. Sure there's a lot of features people want to add. And the
answer is typically, "2.0".
But what is the major platform difference for this major revision?
I just built HEAD (2.0 on 7_2) and... umm... I like 1.2
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:26 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>>
>>> To me this is a hack and not a feature.
>>> There is a better way to do this things than kludge things here and
>>> there in the cod
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Earl Lapus wrote:
> hi all,
>
> (Newbie question) I just want to ask, why isn't the virusprot table declared
> with the `persist` keyword like snort2c and sshlockout?
In case there are no rules referring to the table:
"persist - causes the kernel to keep the table
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Tim A. wrote:
> I don't get it. Sure there's a lot of features people want to add. And the
> answer is typically, "2.0".
> But what is the major platform difference for this major revision?
If you are brave try to do a diff between RELENG_1_2 and master and
you will
It was always my understanding that pfsense stability came before
features. I don't mind that, because i would rather have a product that
works 100% of the time, without the features i want. Rather then a
product that works 50% of the time, with all the features I want.
Adam
Tim A. wrote:
I do
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Tim A. wrote:
> I don't get it. Sure there's a lot of features people want to add. And the
> answer is typically, "2.0".
> But what is the major platform difference for this major revision?
> I just built HEAD (2.0 on 7_2) and... umm... I like 1.2.3, at least it
> w
I don't get it. Sure there's a lot of features people want to add. And
the answer is typically, "2.0".
But what is the major platform difference for this major revision?
I just built HEAD (2.0 on 7_2) and... umm... I like 1.2.3, at least it
works.
This is so broken and as far as I can tell, mos
Hi!
Sorry for html settings...
Date: Sun, 5 Jul 2009 18:17:20 +0100
From: francisco.cabr...@gmail.com
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Question about multi-wan
Hi,
I have up and running pfSense 1.2.3-RC2
I have two adsl lines, wan and wan1 connections up and running for each l
hi all,
(Newbie question) I just want to ask, why isn't the virusprot table declared
with the `persist` keyword like snort2c and sshlockout?
Cheers!
--
There are seven words in this sentence.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:47 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>
>> To me this is a hack and not a feature.
>> There is a better way to do this things than kludge things here and
>> there in the code. The right fix was proposed once and not everybody
>> l
16 matches
Mail list logo
