Hello,
I have never used pfSense, but it appears to be highly recommended.
I am building a firewall box and although I could do the iptables
myself, I wanted to have available a user interface so I can teach
someone else how to manage it.
I am considering using pfSense, but have some questio
Try here
http://www.kerberos.si/ENG/Soekris19.htm
You can fit in 2 5501 boards in some models for a failover configuration.
Only the led s are not visable
--
___
*Johan Hendriks*
*Schavemaker Transport*
Tel: +31 (0)251 229098
Fax: +31 (0)251 212016
email: j.hendr...@schave
Tom Keyser schrieb:
> Hello,
>
> I have never used pfSense, but it appears to be highly recommended.
>
> I am building a firewall box and although I could do the iptables
> myself, I wanted to have available a user interface so I can teach
> someone else how to manage it.
>
> I am considering using
> To: support@pfsense.com
> From: vand...@gmail.com
> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:56:03 +0200
> Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: odd sip firewall issue
>
[...]
>
> Thanks for the help.
>
> When I do a dump on the pflog0 interface than I see the packets coming
> in but now to the internal address
Tebano epaminonda wrote:
>
>
>> To: support@pfsense.com
>> From: vand...@gmail.com
>> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:56:03 +0200
>> Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: odd sip firewall issue
>>
> [...]
>>
>> Thanks for the help.
>>
>> When I do a dump on the pflog0 interface than I see the packets coming
>
> To: support@pfsense.com
> From: vand...@gmail.com
> Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 10:07:03 +0200
> Subject: [pfSense Support] Re: odd sip firewall issue
>
> Tebano epaminonda wrote:
> >
> >
> >> To: support@pfsense.com
> >> From: vand...@gmail.com
> >> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:56:03 +0200
> >> S
Nathan Eisenberg wrote:
> I do feel that changing the port may not truly constitute an increase in
> security. It makes you less visible, perhaps. But this particular firewall
> is already subjected to port scans across the entire range, including
> highports (it has some very high traffic web
Hi folks,
I'm building a reasonably high end firewall in the next month or so. I
will be routing up to gigabit speeds between 7 subnets, but the sort
of baseline noice will be in the 30 megabit sustained area.
I understand the corelation to the BSD 7 HCL and individual
components, but I have been
Hi - I've done some more experimenting on this problem I ran into
in March. Near as I can tell, 1:1 NAT fails sometimes, and will
sometimes put internal addresses on the outside.
Using pfsense 1.2.3-RC1 (built on Wed Apr 22 15:36:34 EDT 2009)
I see two failure modes for 1:1 NAT with dual WAN port
Hi folks,
I ran into a problem today which is described in this ticket:
http://cvstrac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=1631
This is the remove the colon from MAC address sent to MS 2003 Radius
server issue.
It looks like this is now a feature request and not necessarily high
priority,,, is that true?
I
> -Original Message-
> From: Evgeny Yurchenko [mailto:evgeny.yurche...@frontline.ca]
> Sent: July 21, 2009 8:25 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] IGMP packet out of WAN
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Ermal Luçi [mailto:ermal.l...@gmail.com]
> > Sent
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Evgeny
Yurchenko wrote:
>
> Suddenly I discovered pfSense-development distribution which has compiler
> (yes, I was that stupid thad had not paid attention that there wer such
> thing).
> Now I'd like to play with igmpproxy package. Where do I download source code
Hi folks,
I just found this post from Chris in the forums:
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,7675.0.html
It refers to the issue below being resolved in 1.3, which I now
understand is actually been point upped to 2.0. I'm snooping around in
the alpha snapshot section with the understanding
13 matches
Mail list logo
