Bill Marquette a écrit :
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 1:32 PM, Vick Khera vi...@khera.org wrote:
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
3com 905 (xl)
I'd put this on your WAN and the intel on the LAN. 3Com have been
well support in FreeBSD (and even in the original
Hi Chris and Keenan,
It is still not working so this is exactly what I have. I don't usually
post all the live IPs but at this point I just need it to work.
Windows 2K3 Server (no firewall) 10.0.3.1
This guy needs to receive LDAP and SMPT traffic from OPT1 Interface
LAN Rules:
Proto
Ron Lemon wrote:
Hi Chris and Keenan,
It is still not working so this is exactly what I have. I don't usually
post all the live IPs but at this point I just need it to work.
Windows 2K3 Server (no firewall) 10.0.3.1
This guy needs to receive LDAP and SMPT traffic from OPT1 Interface
LAN
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 21:44, Ugo Bellavance u...@lubik.ca wrote:
I wasn't sure if rl was Realtek, but I agree on your statement. The
firewall will have 30 mbps throughput max, would I still benefit from the em
card? I could also use the fxp card in the old firewall.
Biggest issue I've found
Lenny wrote:
Hi,
I'm the same guy that had that long thread about not being able to
push more than 15kpps.
Well, this is sort of a report + some additional questions.
Anyway, eventually we purchased an IBM x3550 server with 2 Quad Core
CPUs (5230 I think).
Now I can push 310Mb, which is
Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
Lenny wrote:
Hi,
I'm the same guy that had that long thread about not being able to
push more than 15kpps.
Well, this is sort of a report + some additional questions.
Anyway, eventually we purchased an IBM x3550 server with 2 Quad Core
CPUs (5230 I think).
Now I
Lenny schreef:
But I would really like to ask again, as this is very important: will
replacing the PCI-X NIC with PCI-e one give some boost in performance?
Unlikely, there is little reason to switch. The theoretical bandwidth
cases are not too helpful.
The intel dual port pci-e cards are
