I'm looking at making a shaping bridge, hopefully using a single port
using VLANs (although this isn't a strict requirement)
Is pfSense a good choice for this role?
(The reason I ask, researching this on Google yields several forums
discussions indicating that m0n0 is a better fit, but since
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Dave Warren
dave-use...@djwcomputers.com wrote:
I'm looking at making a shaping bridge, hopefully using a single port
using VLANs (although this isn't a strict requirement)
Is pfSense a good choice for this role?
It'll work fine, potentially with one caveat -
Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
I got very interesting results after moving to new kernel.
From:
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 14090.0-14100.0 sec799 MBytes670 Mbits/sec
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 14100.0-14110.0 sec795 MBytes667 Mbits/sec
In message d64aa1760911281210y5677dc3q8c8db8292db7b...@mail.gmail.com
Chris Buechler c...@pfsense.org was claimed
to have wrote:
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 3:04 PM, Dave Warren
dave-use...@djwcomputers.com wrote:
I'm looking at making a shaping bridge, hopefully using a single port
using VLANs
Is it possible to SNAT a port instead of doing a 1:1 on an ip address?
---
Kind Regards,
Mr Gabriel (bberry mail)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Hello all,
I am running pfSense 1.2.3-RC1, and the php process is currently eating 100%
CPU. I have tried logging in via SSH and using the restart the
WebConfigurator option, but that doesn't restart the PHP process.
I am holding off on restarting the machine in case any devs was to SSH in