Re: [pfSense Support] how does one test for stability?

I suspect my Alix embedded appliance (500 MHz 586 class with 256 MB RAM) is getting maxed out via either heat or traffic. e. Rejecting UDP port 80 on LAN f. Rejecting TCP 6667 (IIRC), 135 (MS RPC) on LAN g. Rejecting TCP/UDP 445 (SMB/CIFS), 137-139 (NetBIOS) on LAN. My imac and a PC laptop

[pfSense Support] NAT with WAN subnet

Hi. I'm having some problems setting up NAT when using multiple external adresses (ie. a /29 subnet). I have a WAN interface set up as x.x.x.18/29 but when making NAT rules, I can't select the individual adresses - only "WAN address" or "Any". When attempting to use 1:1 NAT I can't get it to

Re: [pfSense Support] NAT with WAN subnet

On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Martin Kruse Jensen wrote: > Hi. > > I'm having some problems setting up NAT when using multiple external adresses > (ie. a /29 subnet). I have a WAN interface set up as x.x.x.18/29 but when > making NAT rules, I can't select the individual adresses - only "WAN ad

Re: [pfSense Support] NAT with WAN subnet

Remko Lodder skrev: On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Martin Kruse Jensen wrote: Hi. I'm having some problems setting up NAT when using multiple external adresses (ie. a /29 subnet). I have a WAN interface set up as x.x.x.18/29 but when making NAT rules, I can't select the individual adresses

Re: [pfSense Support] NAT with WAN subnet

On Jan 31, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Martin Kruse Jensen wrote: > Remko Lodder skrev: >> On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Martin Kruse Jensen wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi. >>> >>> I'm having some problems setting up NAT when using multiple external >>> adresses (ie. a /29 subnet). I have a WAN interface s

Re: [pfSense Support] NAT with WAN subnet

On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Remko Lodder wrote: > > On Jan 31, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Martin Kruse Jensen wrote: > > > Remko Lodder skrev: > >> On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Martin Kruse Jensen wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Hi. > >>> > >>> I'm having some problems setting up NAT when using multipl

Re: [pfSense Support] NAT with WAN subnet

Yehuda Katz skrev: On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Remko Lodder > wrote: On Jan 31, 2010, at 12:14 PM, Martin Kruse Jensen wrote: > Remko Lodder skrev: >> On Jan 31, 2010, at 11:27 AM, Martin Kruse Jensen wrote: >> >> >> >>> Hi. >>>

Re: [pfSense Support] how does one test for stability?

Michel, Web surfing happens on port 80 and tcp only. There should be no udp port 80 traffic going out. I think I read it in the pfsense book which just came out. I am suspecting type of traffic also. Tried controlling per IP states to 20, 30 , 50 and it seems that is not the solution. I am floore

Re: [pfSense Support] OpenBGPd package on 1.2.3-release

On Fri, Jan 29, 2010 at 11:03 AM, Aarno Aukia wrote: > Thanks for committing, Committed. Thanks for submitting. Scott - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfse

Re: [pfSense Support] Command in Crontab Missing

Ok thanks Aarno, i'll give it a try Regards, Indrajaya Pitra Perdana On 1/29/2010 11:38 PM, Aarno Aukia wrote: The more helpful suggestion IMHO: use the "Cron" package to manage the - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr