I found a serial cable at Fry's but you guys are going to laugh at my sorry
state...
I don't have a single laptop at home that has a serial port. Perhaps my work
docking station will haveHad I known this I would have purchased USB to
serial...
I think VGA with embedded is now major conveni
I would agree 1%
I have long wanted the embedded to have vga.
For projects that need it - i end up using vyatta sadly
:-(
On Jul 31, 2010, at 4:17 AM, Anil Garg wrote:
> I found a serial cable at Fry's but you guys are going to laugh at my sorry
> state...
>
> I don't have a single la
- Original Message -
From: Tiago
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2010 11:30 PM
Subject: RES: [pfSense Support] Proxy report is not working
Thanks for your reply
I left blank on log rotation setup. I think it is right, or not??
Thanks in adv
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Anil Garg wrote:
>
> I think VGA with embedded is now major convenience issue.
>
I think we'll probably see it for 2.0, but anyone who does any serious
network work has no shortage of serial gear. There isn't a decent
managed switch or commercial router or many em
Sawadeekap
I'm running pfSense 2.0 BETA4 on a Supermicro ATOM Barebone (5010A-PHF).
Everything works more or less as expected, except I see always a CPU
usage of 25% (Dualcore with HT) in the GUI.
Is that ok?
Thanks,
Fabian
top on shell says:
last pid: 51666; load averages: 1.08, 1.03,
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Fabian Abplanalp
wrote:
> Sawadeekap
>
> I'm running pfSense 2.0 BETA4 on a Supermicro ATOM Barebone (5010A-PHF).
> Everything works more or less as expected, except I see always a CPU usage
> of 25% (Dualcore with HT) in the GUI.
>
> Is that ok?
>
Maybe. Maybe n
Hi Chris
Thanks for the pointer. I will check that out.
Your point about serial cable @ serious ops environment is also valid.
Anil Garg
+1 408-221-7725
- Original Message
From: Chris Buechler
To: support@pfsense.com
Sent: Sat, July 31, 2010 10:50:55 AM
Subject: Re: [pfSense Supp
Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler:
Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, system
is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a decent amount of
traffic then yeah it's probably normal.
Current traffic is low (WAN in 56Kbps/out 700kbps)... Even with "no"
traffi
Given that it's showing up in "system", it's likely something
interrupt-related. I would first try turning off all power management in
the BIOS, and also disabling HPET (High-Precision Event Timer) there if
you can. Although it sounds silly, if it's a PS/2-based system, make sure
there's a ke
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 4:55 PM, Fabian Abplanalp
wrote:
> Am 31.07.2010 22:52, schrieb Chris Buechler:
>>
>> Maybe. Maybe not. Impossible to say based on your description, system
>> is what's using the CPU, so if you're pushing a decent amount of
>> traffic then yeah it's probably normal.
>
> Cu
10 matches
Mail list logo
