On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a master/slave setup of 1.2.3 and about to install haproxy,
> I have 2 options under packages:
> BETA-0.29
> and
> BETA-0.30
>
> My question, why is the newer one marked as "stable"?
>
As we were doing some work on the packa
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Chris Buechler wrote:
> it's a simple fat finger to drop that traffic into your LAN.
That's poetry.
db
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail:
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:25 PM, Bao Ha wrote:
>
> Perhaps, Cisco is expecting a firewalled network to use managed
> switches. Is it best practice? Why is there a resistance to VLAN in
> the pfSense community?
>
I don't think anyone in this thread is expressing resistance to VLANs
in general, not
If you jailbreak your ipad there is a openvpn client.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 11:13 AM, Vick Khera wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
>> Viscosity on the Mac works great, but that doesn't apply to iOS.
>>
>
> We just punt and use the PPTP client built-in to iOS. It is not
>
- "Tim Nelson" wrote:
> - "Paul Mansfield" wrote:
> > On 04/08/10 18:31, Tim Nelson wrote:
> > > There is no option for legacy mode in the BIOS. :-(
> >
> > presumably there's no PS2 keyboard port?
> >
> > or if there is, your keyboard isn't the type which can turn into a
> > ps2
> > ke
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 7:35 AM, Tiago wrote:
>
>
> Hello guys
>
> I use pfsense 1.2.3 and everything is ok...
>
> But there is a user in my network that use a msn messenger on the browser...
>
> I tried to stop this using DNS Forwarder but the site changes every
> day...The website is
>
> X10.ilov
> The low-end Cisco ASA 5505 requires VLAN configuration since it is
> just a switch.
> The Cisco ASA 5510 has four Ethernet ports. If you need more, just
> use VLAN.
> Perhaps, Cisco is expecting a firewalled network to use managed
> switches. Is it best practice? Why is there a resistance to VLAN
Just want to throw another data point into this confusing discussion.
The low-end Cisco ASA 5505 requires VLAN configuration since it is
just a switch.
The Cisco ASA 5510 has four Ethernet ports. If you need more, just use VLAN.
Perhaps, Cisco is expecting a firewalled network to use managed
swi
On Aug 5, 2010, at 5:20 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Johan Hendriks
> wrote:
>
>>> does freeBSD support trim with SSDs?
>
>> as of Freebsd 8.1 it is.
>>
>> read the following:
>> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/relnotes-detailed.html#DISKS
>
> Very interest
Comments from another perspective on the must/should question:
Best practice says to physically segregate networks by trust level and by
impact of error or breach.
Somewhat self-evidently, this is to mitigate the impact of a) errors, and
b) security breaches. Of the two, errors (i.e. human err
On 8/5/10 8:13 AM, David Burgess wrote:
> Paul,
>
> I understand your post up to this point:
>
>> if the switch's port are set so that connected devices can't cause them
>> to flip from untagged to tagged mode (in cisco speak from access to
>> trunk - "switchport nonegotiate"
>
> I'm looking at
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 9:09 AM, Johan Hendriks
wrote:
>> does freeBSD support trim with SSDs?
> as of Freebsd 8.1 it is.
>
> read the following:
> http://www.freebsd.org/releases/8.1R/relnotes-detailed.html#DISKS
Very interesting. I see this in the latest build log for 2.0:
Thu Aug 5 03:00:22
Paul,
I understand your post up to this point:
> if the switch's port are set so that connected devices can't cause them
> to flip from untagged to tagged mode (in cisco speak from access to
> trunk - "switchport nonegotiate"
I'm looking at the help file for my switch, and thinking this section
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Seth Mos wrote:
> Viscosity on the Mac works great, but that doesn't apply to iOS.
>
We just punt and use the PPTP client built-in to iOS. It is not
really as secure as we'd like but we normally only run ssh or an https
connection over it so that part is double se
Op 5-8-2010 16:44, Paul Mansfield schreef:
On 05/08/10 07:53, Seth Mos wrote:
Do note, that if you ever write the device from start to end that this
negates the wear levelling. It then only has the spare cells on the
drive or card to remap blocks (~7%).
On 05/08/10 07:53, Seth Mos wrote:
> Do note, that if you ever write the device from start to end that this
> negates the wear levelling. It then only has the spare cells on the
> drive or card to remap blocks (~7%).
does freeBSD support trim with SSDs?
-
On 05/08/10 06:51, David Burgess wrote:
> my DSL and LAN ports will be on the same switch, different vlans. This
...
> what are my risks? I know it has been said on this list that WAN and
if you can clearly label the switch so that you yourself "cannot" make a
mistake when connecting cables
if yo
Hello guys
I use pfsense 1.2.3 and everything is ok...
But there is a user in my network that use a msn messenger on the browser...
I tried to stop this using DNS Forwarder but the site changes every
day...The website is
X10.iloveim.com
X11.iloveim.com
X30.iloveim.com
Etc...
The number aft
Hello,
Just inquiring here, does anybody already know of a SSL vpn client that
works on the Apple iPad devices?
Viscosity on the Mac works great, but that doesn't apply to iOS.
I see mentions of a Cisco and Juniper client, but no idea if these can
be made to work with pfSense.
Regards,
Se
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 2:08 AM, Tortise wrote:
> - Original Message - From: "Chris Buechler"
> To:
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 6:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] multi-wan, multi-lan security
>
>
>> Doing VLANs properly all on one switch is probably pretty safe if done
>> rig
20 matches
Mail list logo
