WAN_PPPoE static ip address it is planned in the new version?
Please, make it!
Roman.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com
For additional commands, e-mail: support-h...@pfsense.com
Commercial support
Not sure what you are requesting. I do static PPPoE all the time. The carrier
assigns a static to your login. It has nothing to do with a router function
unless I am missing something.
--Original Message--
From: drova...@kaluga-gov.ru
To: support@pfsense.com
ReplyTo:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Cyril Jaquier cyril.jaqu...@jaqpot.net wrote:
I have WAN, LAN, VOIP and several VAP (WLAN0, WLAN1, etc). I would like to
only allow traffic from VOIP to go through WAN and no other interfaces. I
didn't find a way to do this easily and the only solution seems to
Hello all,
I'm using 1.2.3-RELEASE with HAProxy 0.29 which I believe is 1.3.22. Is
there any plan to upgrade this to a version of HAProxy that supports
keep-alive? Or is there a work-around that I can employ here?
Thanks,
Josh.
Hi All;
I'm trying to bring up VPN access to an internal network via PPTP.
On the firewall (pfsense 2.0 BETA1, built 4/18 2010) I enabled 8 PPTP
users, setup a remote address of 172.30.0.64, used the WAN address for
the server address, and configured a user.
I went to firewall-rules-PPTP
On 10-12-03 10:43 AM, David Miller wrote:
Hi All;
I'm trying to bring up VPN access to an internal network via PPTP.
On the firewall (pfsense 2.0 BETA1, built 4/18 2010) I enabled 8 PPTP
users, setup a remote address of 172.30.0.64, used the WAN address for
the server address, and configured
I'm have a problem with the firewall rules with pfSense 1.2.3-RELEASE.
The firewall is blocking the traffic from 10.0.150.250.1321 unless state is not
kept. Of course without the state the traffic is then blocked on the egress
port. Below is the log and firewall rules for both cases. The
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, David Miller dmil.pfsen...@metheus.org wrote:
From: David Miller dmil.pfsen...@metheus.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PPTP question
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 1:33 PM
On 12/3/10 12:09 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
wrote:
On 10-12-03 10:43 AM,
Original Message-
From: Evgeny Yurchenko [mailto:evg.yu...@rogers.com]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2010 12:57 PM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Firewall rule problem
On 10-12-03 12:51 PM, Wakefield, Thad M. wrote:
I'm have a problem with the firewall rules
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, David Miller dmil.pfsen...@metheus.org wrote:
From: David Miller dmil.pfsen...@metheus.org
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] PPTP question
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 2:35 PM
On 12/3/10 2:00 PM, EVGENY YURCHENKO
wrote:
[snip]
Thanks
--- On Fri, 12/3/10, Wakefield, Thad M. twakefi...@stcloudstate.edu wrote:
From: Wakefield, Thad M. twakefi...@stcloudstate.edu
Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Firewall rule problem
To: support@pfsense.com support@pfsense.com
Date: Friday, December 3, 2010, 2:35 PM
Original Message-
Can you send me .pcap file with this packet please? Once I saw similar
problem when IP header had additional options. The packet just did not
follow my rule and that is it!
Thanks.
While capturing the packet for you, I discovered the problem. This traffic is
asymmetrical. This packet is
On 12/3/10 2:41 PM, EVGENY YURCHENKO wrote:
[big snip]
I can ping the internal address of the firewall
(172.30.0.1) over the VPN, but other targets on that network
can't arp the remote box to reply.
Thanks!
--- David
Interesting and weird. I recall this way worked on 1.2.3. Then I think
On 10-12-03 03:43 PM, Wakefield, Thad M. wrote:
Can you send me .pcap file with this packet please? Once I saw similar
problem when IP header had additional options. The packet just did not
follow my rule and that is it!
Thanks.
While capturing the packet for you, I discovered the
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Wakefield, Thad M.
twakefi...@stcloudstate.edu wrote:
Can you send me .pcap file with this packet please? Once I saw similar
problem when IP header had additional options. The packet just did not
follow my rule and that is it!
Thanks.
While capturing the
15 matches
Mail list logo