Hi All,
My pfsense devices won't do auto update, are there any known issues with
0.90?
Also, the snmp daemon on my 0.90 devices are reporting that their interfaces
are all down! I'm using carp, will this be causing it?
Thanks,
Adam.
-
Hi,
I have a Lex box (the CV860A), but I can't get it to boot any version of
pfSense.
I'm trying to use the embedded image, but every one I've tried over the past
few weeks has hung at right after 'Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf'.
The little spinning line spins a few times and then just stop
d myself in shell but i think it should exist
> in the Gui.
The Zebra/Quagga (I don't remember which is in pfsense, maybe both are
available) packages should provide both ospf and rip, as well as bgp.
You're probably out of luck if you want isis though :)
Ada
Hi,
I'm currently writing an NMS (http://www.pimpmynetwork.org/observer/) which
uses SNMP to automatically guess the operating system of hosts and setup
graphing/monitoring accordingly.
The cut-down SNMP daemon in m0n0/pfsense massively reduces the number of
things I can monitor on m0n0, and I ca
upport] pfSense SNMP identification
I don't have an answer to your questions but the screenshots at your
page look promising :-)
You could maybe create a package for pfSense to make it a monitoring
appliance.
Holger
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Armstrong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
rac.pfsense.com/tktview?tn=257
Scott
On 1/24/07, Adam Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My current deployment is generating 500mb of rrd files!
>
> I'm sure at some point in the future it would be quite easy to
> appliance-ize, though perhaps a pfsense package wouldn'
guess most people wouldn't agree :)
Adam.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Ullrich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 24 January 2007 17:10
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] pfSense SNMP identification
We use BSnmpd.
Scott
On 1/24/07, Adam Armstrong <[EMAIL P
in ...
Yours
tmueko
Am 24.01.2007 um 15:03 schrieb Adam Armstrong:
> Hi,
>
> I'm currently writing an NMS (http://www.pimpmynetwork.org/
> observer/) which
> uses SNMP to automatically guess the operating system of hosts and
> setup
> graphing/monitoring accordingly.
>
&
This is a very useful addition, provided it doesn’t any negative impacts on
the platform!
Adam.
From: Ronald L. Rosson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 January 2007 14:27
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: [pfSense Support] Feature Request: Adding pfflowd to embedded
Has anyone tho
> On 1/25/07, Adam Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [snip]
> > Except, Still no suggestions on how to identify a pfSense needle in a
> > haystack of FreeBSD servers. :\
>
> Just let us know what you want us to do and we will do it.
>
Manuel has made a mod
Hi,
If I try to edit a CARP virtual IP, it tells me that the VHID is already in
use and won't let me save the changes. The result is that every time I
change a setting on one of the CARP virtual IPs, I have to change the VHID
on every device. Very annoying!
Is this intended behaviour, or a
> On 2/21/07, Andrew Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > any plans to enable additional "SNMP'able" items like cpu usage,
> memory
> > usage, and disk usage? i know m0n0wall allowed me to graph a few more
> > values in cacti than pfsense does.
>
> As soon as someone adds the support to bsnmpd, sur
224.0.0.2 is the "all routers" multicast address, and any traffic to it
is probably router discovery or something similar.
adam.
That looks more like a protocol decode issue to me. 224.0.0.2 is a
multicast address, I wouldn't be surprised if that really wasn't UDP.
Can you show an example of a
Is it possible to have a 'hot standby' on a WRAP if the firewall
is a PC (we are not running any packages). Don't consider performance.
There's no reason why not!
adam.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a
jamona perez wrote:
Okay, I did not realize that, this is really helpful info. Thinking
about it for 2 minutes I just realized that a in bridge mode, the WAN
does not "really" have an IP address, does it ? so carp has no IP
failover to do whatsoever.
Please Correct me if I'm wrong.
So if the b
jamona perez wrote:
Thanks for the tip, I'm not too sure about this stp stuff, because I
always think twice before doing that kind of stuff, I've had my share
of network loops not being always well-handled by switch hardware. On
the other hand I've read from m0n0wall's forum that it is feasible
Siju George wrote:
Dear People in U.K,
I had a little taste of the British Telecom ( BT ) ISP a while back.
It seems that they have a device ( modem ) that has to be used to give
IP address by "dhcp" to all systems.
And even if you want to give Static IPs ( routable on the Internet )
assigned
jamespev wrote:
Hello all! I am having a major issue that I'm hoping you can shed
light on. We recently added an MPLS link from our location to our
other company offices (replacing a pfsense VPN tunnel that was working
great) and am now having issues across it. The MPLS is hooked to a
Gary Buckmaster wrote:
Chris Bagnall wrote:
Greetings list,
Does anyone know if pfSense includes support for failover between two
LAN interfaces?
For example, one can provide high availability using CARP to create a
virtual router IP failing over between 2 pfSense boxes, but that's
not goi
Royce Mitchell III wrote:
Adam Armstrong wrote:
Carp is unnecessary when using BGP, as the provider sees routes into
your network via the individual devices and both devices see routes out.
You wouldn't want to run BGP from a CARP IP anyawys, as it would
result in BGP flapping when the
Paul M wrote:
Royce Mitchell III wrote:
Is the BGP package for pfsense available, yet?
Also, does it play nice with CARP, or is CARP even necessary when you
have BGP?
I think CARP is a very different thing - BGP is a way of having multiple
circuits to different ISPs to get resilience
Dimitri Rodis wrote:
Would a WRAP board be capable of NATting and Shaping a 10 megabit
symmetric connection without choking?
It should.
Thanks,
adam.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
Marty Nelson wrote:
I have an IPSec tunnel connecting my network to one of our customer
sites, and while I can ping a computer on their network I am unable to
remote desktop to. Currently all of our customer tunnels are setup to
terminate in our DMZ to limit access back into our network. I ha
23 matches
Mail list logo
