like it's related to having the TinyDNS package installed.
__
Previous message from Chris Buechler on 2008-07-27 at 5:55 PM -0400
--
|On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 5:00
gt; they?
|
|Why are you using AON? There is nothing in your config that requires
|AON, so no need to add complexity by forcing its configuration.
--
---
Bryan DermanDerman Enterprises Incorporated
http://www.derman.com/
---
."
__
Previous message from Matias Surdi on 2008-06-16 at 12:35 PM +0200
--
|Is it possible to add another IP to the LAN interface?
|
|How must it be done?
|
|
e router's LAN interface to the
remotely VPN'd pfSense router's LAN interface (i.e., via it's own IPsec
tunnel)?
--
---
Bryan DermanDerman Enterprises Incorporated
http://www.derman.com/
---
failed
)
Package WAS NOT installed properly.
---
__
Previous message from Scott Ullrich on 2008-03-12 at 8:07 PM -0400
------
|On 3/12/08, Bryan Derman wrote:
|>
On a functioning pfSense 1.2 release, attempting to install the Tiny DNS
package via the web-based interface yields:
---
Installing dns-server and its dependencies.
---
Downloading package configuration file... done.
Saving updated package information... done.
Downloading dns-server and its depende
I see how multiple WANs from different providers (assuming they use
different link-level sources and/or technology) can provide backup for
outgoing access, but I haven't figured out how this can help for incoming
access to servers.
I.E., let's say I have 2 WAN connections with public IPs; 98.76.54
e greatest and the best
|on the forum can solve this in minutes!!!
|
|Thanks again for the utility. Best Regards
--
---
Bryan DermanDerman Enterprises Incorporated
http://www.derman.com/
Re:
---
|It looks like that it needs a public ip address to create a tunnel. I
|could try and get public IP address at one place but it looks like it
|still will not work because I need public IP address on both sides.
---
We use pfSense 1.2 to support a VPN between 2 offices. In our case, o
a URL for this?
__
Previous message from Chris Buechler on 2008-02-07 at 5:28 PM -0500
------
|Bryan Derman wrote:
|> Thanks, but VLANs are not an option due to other hardware/switch
|> limitations.
|>
|> Having only a b
Thanks, but VLANs are not an option due to other hardware/switch limitations.
Having only a basic understanding of VLANs, I'm also not sure how that
would apply (but would be happy to learn) since the underlying objective
is to have pfSense support multiple LAN subnets (in this case, 3) on a
singl
accessible right now. You're partially
|right, partially wrong. I'll put it online somewhere later.
|
|Bryan Derman wrote:
|> After searching the archives, the forum and conferring with Mr. Google,
|> I've not found anything about the best/correct strategy to use to support
|&g
After searching the archives, the forum and conferring with Mr. Google,
I've not found anything about the best/correct strategy to use to support
multiple LAN subnets on a single LAN port.
The Questions
=
- is using address aliases the correct/optimal/best way to create the WAN
aliases
13 matches
Mail list logo
