Can I have multiple segments on an interface? Meaning can I run
10.10.10.0/24 and 172.16.128.0/20 on the same interface? I assume I can
but I don't see where on the web interface I can do so..
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PRO
not sure, but probably the quickest is to see if tcpdump is installed, i
am at home so i don't have access to a box
Chris wrote:
I need to view logs of all communications both inbound and outbound.
How can I do this from commandline SSH?
--
I am running the 1.0BETA downloaded off a ftp site a few weeks back,
where can I find a newer version?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry, I just found a snapshot dated 2-20-06. thanks.
On Wed, 2006-03-01 at 17:15 -0800, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> I am running the 1.0BETA downloaded off a ftp site a few weeks back,
> where can I find a newer v
I'm trying to set up the following:
/ <-> CARP
WAN int (PFSENSE BOX)<-> LAN
\<-> DMZ
I want to have nat on the LAN, bi-nat on the DMZ, filtering incoming and
outgoing traffic. I'm close, but I've had issues with trying to get this
all working; I can't get outbound PASV ftp
pshot. Please update.
>
> On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm trying to set up the following:
> >
> >/ <-> CARP
> > WAN int (PFSENSE BOX)<-> LAN
> >\<-> DMZ
> >
> > I w
Hmm. I'm still having the passive FTP issue. It's quite possibly
something in my rules, does anything look borked?
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:02 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Yep, thats it.
>
> On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Thanks Scot
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 12:12 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> FTP is handled by rules behind the scene. The rules you are showing
> us mean nothing to it.
Sorry this might be a bit ugly sending everything, but here goes:
scrub on xl0 all fragment reassemble
anchor "ftpsesame/*" all
anchor "firewall
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:02 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Looks fine to me. Not really sure what is going on as FTP works fine here.
Like I said, works fine on the LAN interface, not the DMZ interface.
Perhaps there's something else in the pfsense config i'm missing.
do I have to set a 1:1 NAT f
wrote:
> Shouldnt need to do any of this, no. I'll try to make some time to
> bring up a box and test this but my next 4 days are going to be tough
> to find extra time.
>
> On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:02 -0500,
The firmware autoupdate shows me running
1.0b2rc5
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:24 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Sounds like the bug we fixed after beta1, honestly...
>
> On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > currently:
> >
> > x.x.x.89 is the
status page.
>
> On 3/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The firmware autoupdate shows me running
> > 1.0b2rc5
> >
> > On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 14:24 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > > Sounds like the bug we fixed after beta1, hones
, as well as your work on this project. It has
saved me from having to use a PIX or some other commercial product I
don't like. FreeBSD and PF are awesome.
On Thu, 2006-03-02 at 11:32 -0800, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> ya I knew that, sorry I wasn't sure where else that was listed, I keep
I have a machine that I'm building as a redundant firewall, the primary
box was origionally set up using beta1, and upgraded to beta2, and the
new one is just being built with beta2. When I go to package manager, I
get:
Fatal error: Call to a member function on a non-object
in /etc/inc/pfsense-uti
Scott Ullrich wrote:
If you have BETA2, then this is for you...
I keep failing to post instructions on how full installation users can
keep up to date with pfSense changes.
This *DOES NOT* update FreeBSD but updates all pfSense base components
such as the webConfigurator, etc.
Can the OS be
RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_03-12-2006
I have 2 boxes that are synced, and I am getting an error that the macro
dmz is not defined - the section of rules.debug is:
# Load balancing anchor - slbd updates
rdr-anchor "slb"
rdr on $lan proto tcp from any to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021
rdr on $dmz proto
terface name instead of the
> interfaces description. Try running cvs_sync.sh releng_1 and get on
> the absolute latest and greatest version if you are on the full
> installation platform.
>
>
> On 3/14/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > RELENG
Working now, kicked it over again.
On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 16:15 -0800, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> That seems to have solved it on my primary, but my failover is still
> getting that error. Any other info needed?
>
> On Tue, 2006-03-14 at 17:53 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > Th
i'm replacing our pix with a couple pfsense boxes, and we have some
internal LAN ip's that are statically mapped to the dmz, e.g. - our DMZ
mail server routes mail to a DMZ address that's mapped to an internal
address
I'm not sure how to set this up with pfsense, I figure in PF it would be
done wi
On Thu, 2006-03-16 at 12:49 +, Robert Mortimer wrote:
> You can port forward back through a NAT setup
>
> http://faq.pfsense.org/index.php?action=artikel&cat=10&id=53&artlang=en
>
>
> You can 1:1 map DMZ machine addresses to virtual addresses on the WAN
>
> (see same area of the control pa
Where can I find out about the squid devel, whats functional and whats
not etc?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ACL name 'for_inetusers' not defined!
FATAL: Bungled squid.conf line 61: http_access allow pf_networks
for_inetusers within_timeframe
Squid Cache (Version 2.5.STABLE12): Terminated abnormally.
relevant line:
http_access allow pf_networks for_inetusers within_timeframe
I'm seeing this in the system log:
Mar 24 17:02:26 kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway x.x.x.x (!AF_LINK)
Mar 24 17:02:27 kernel: arp_rtrequest: bad gateway y.y.y.y (!AF_LINK)
The status CARP looks fine, though these messages seem new, is anyone
aware of what would cause these?
-
Sorry Scott I should've looked., thnx.
On Fri, 2006-03-24 at 20:49 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> FAQ. This is normal and does not hurt anything.
>
> On 3/24/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'm seeing this in the system log:
> >
>
I don't have outbound passive FTP working for machines in the DMZ, what
the heck am I missing?
I see the default block rule is blocking it, what am I missing?
heres from the status log:
DMZ 10.1.1.150:61272X.X.X.X:50105 TCP
-
his will help?
>
> http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=10&id=103&artlang=en&highlight=ftp
>
>
> On 3/25/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I don't have outbound passive FTP working for machines in the DMZ, what
>
On Sat, 2006-03-25 at 15:53 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> I fixed some FTP helper issues on inbound from WAN->LAN[DMZ], etc.
> Try cvs_sync.sh releng_1 and see if it helps. Otherwise after bootup
> you have to run /etc/rc.filter_configure a second time for it to
> install the helpe
I'd like to request a few things that would have been nice as I was
putting in pfsense here at work.
On the System Logs, Firewall page, could the clear logs button be put at
the top, and could the log option for the default block rule be put
there as well? Can the Traffic graph be made so that it
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 13:40 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 3/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to request a few things that would have been nice as I was
> > putting in pfsense here at work.
> >
> >
> > On the Syst
6 at 13:44 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> If you are running on a full install, please issue:
>
> cvs_sync.sh releng_1 && /etc/rc.filter_configure
>
> And see if the problem is fixed.
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> On 3/25/06, Scott Ullrich <[EMAIL PROTECT
Sorry I guess I misread it, it all looks good now.
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:01 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> The pass rule for 8021 is further up. Why is this not correct?
>
> On 3/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > It's still not comin
On Mon, 2006-03-27 at 17:39 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> It may look okay, but does it work? :)
appears to be, it was only effecting my outbound passive ftp from the
dmz, not to big of concern at the moment... I'll check more later.
thanks
-
Can I install from source my own applications (mainly thinking of Squid,
the package seems to core) to a pfsense box, and not cause any problems
with pfsense's operation?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
rtikel&cat=7&id=102&artlang=en&highlight=compile>
There is a squid package for pfSense is thats what you want. Also its
possible to package add ports but this is also not supported!
On 3/27/06, *Derrick MacPherson * <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
maybe try:
cvs_sync.sh releng_1 && /etc/rc.filter_configure
worked for me.
Adrian Chitoni wrote:
Yesterday I upgraded our firewall from Beta to Beta2.
I backed up the config file, did a fresh install with the live cd iso
image from the pfsense website and restored the configuration.
So far
hp?topic=908.0
>
> On 3/28/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > I had the Squid package installed and working with beta1,
> but since then
> > it only will core dump on startup.
> >
&g
are the squid logs supposed to be working in the GUI at this point?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Do I need to create a virtual IP for the PPTP server in pfsense, or does
it do that for me? I assume I do, but can't test it till I get into work
tomorrow.
thanks.
p.s. - what do people think of some sort of repository of config
examples? Not sure how it could be done, but it would be nice to
cvs_sync.sh releng1 does the same thing?
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 10:51 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> If you are using the Traffic Shaper then you need to upgrade to a
> testing snapshot.
>
> http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_04-03-2006/
>
>
> On 4/4/06, dny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Ya ok, makes sense... Thanks
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 13:44 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Yep, but you don't get FreeBSD updates.
>
> On 4/4/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > cvs_sync.sh releng1 does the same thing?
> >
> >
> > On T
Is the only way to upgrade it using the web interface and uploading it?
Can I ftp it onto the box and upgrade it that way?
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 11:07 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> Ya ok, makes sense... Thanks
>
> On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 13:44 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> &g
# /etc/rc.firmware pfSenseupgrade /tmp/pfSense-Full-Update-
RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_04-03-2006.tgz
tar: Error opening archive: Failed to open '-C': No such file or
directory
Shutdown NOW!
shutdown: [pid 12380]
The system does now not see the hdd, I'll grab the iso and try a fresh
install, but now that
Can I do this, move the slave to a CARP master?
On Tue, 2006-04-04 at 11:37 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> # /etc/rc.firmware pfSenseupgrade /tmp/pfSense-Full-Update-
> RELENG_1_SNAPSHOT_04-03-2006.tgz
> tar: Error opening archive: Failed to open '-C': No such file or
>
System stops at
Trying to mount root from UFS:/dev/ad4s1a
Any recommended recovery methods for this?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ll.
>
> On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > System stops at
> > Trying to mount root from UFS:/dev/ad4s1a
> >
> > Any recommended recovery methods for this?
> >
> >
> > ---
So I downloaded the latest version, boot the CD, and when I go to
install to the hdd, it doesn't see it. Nothings changed on the system in
regards to hardware, the BIOS sees the drive (SATA), so I'm wondering
what might have changed on the OS side to cause this?
-
as is freebsd6 boot cd.. Any advice?
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 14:42 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Nothing has changed.
>
> On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So I downloaded the latest version, boot the CD, and when I go to
> > install to th
ght that it should have been
> pretty much in sync with RELENG_6
>
> On 4/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The BIOS sees the drive properly and the system can boot enough to start
> > decompressing the kernel; the system that works sees this:
>
So for now should I install the older 1.0beta1 that I have that works,
and cvs_sync.sh to current?
On Thu, 2006-04-06 at 11:17 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Good to know. I'll update the files and we'll push forward on _1.
>
> Thanks!
>
> On 4/6/06, Pedro Paulo de Magalhaes Oliveira Junior
> <[
/etc/current-supfile ?
cat /etc/current-supfile
*default host=cvs.pfsense.com
*default base=/root/pfSense
*default release=cvs
*default delete use-rel-suffix
pfSenseHEAD
*default compress
Is that correct? Sorry but I just cvsup'd this box from 1.0beta, (I had
to copy the /usr/local/sbin/cvs_sync
I'm not able to see my secondary interfaces (opt1 and opt2) on the web
interface, I can see them under the assign, but if I try to go to the
page for the specific device I get:
Interfaces: Optional ()
Optional has been disabled because there is no OPT interface.
It looks like these are the erro
Can I/we just have a /etc/current-supfile with:
*default host=cvs.pfsense.com
*default base=/root/pfSense
*default release=cvs
*default delete use-rel-suffix
RELENG_1
*default compress
On Mon, 2006-04-10 at 14:30 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Please explain how you upgraded from a snapshot?
>
>
What format is the floppy with the config on it supposed to be?
PS - If this in the faq, the mysql server for it is down at the moment..
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECT
I've got a box in the DMZ as a test, it works fine, when I move my ftp
server into the DMZ, the firewall is not letting traffic back to the ftp
server it seems.
What info can I send to debug this?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA
BETA4
built on Mon Apr 17 22:46:52 UTC 2006
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:30 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> What version?
>
> On 4/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've got a box in the DMZ as a test, it works fine, when I move my ftp
> > serv
it's not just FTP traffic, it's all traffic
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:37 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Check the system logs. I am pretty sure that all FTP bugs have been squashed.
>
> On 4/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BETA4
> >
it looks to be related to binat.
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:39 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> it's not just FTP traffic, it's all traffic
>
> On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:37 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> > Check the system logs. I am pretty sure that all FTP bug
hanged binat since before beta 1. Are you seeing any blockage?
>
> On 4/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > it looks to be related to binat.
> >
> > On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:39 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> > > it's not just FTP
No blocking in the logs, it almost seems like the traffics being
dropped? I've got DHCP turned on, and this ftp server was not using
DHCP, I've since turned it on, and set a static mapping, like I've done
with my other boxes that are working
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 13:54 -0700, Der
ya this is weird. It works to my 2 test machines, but not my ftp server.
I've checked routing on the boxes, and it looks the same.
Any suggestions?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [E
Well it seems to be just for this one IP. that's what I find really odd
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 17:09 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Not really, that is strange.
>
> Scott
>
>
> On 4/27/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > ya this is weird. It w
ts worth.
>
> - Jason
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Derrick MacPherson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2006 4:33 PM
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] NAT 1:1 and routing issue
>
> Well it seems to be just for this one IP. t
e ftp server to our
outgoing smtp server, which is in the WAN switch, but i can't get any
data to come back through the firewall into the ftp server. I added
logging to some of the outgoing rules, and I see the traffic succesfuly
being passed.. Any ideas?
On Thu, 2006-04-27 at 16:08 -0700, Derr
and what is even more screwed...
If I give the ftp server it's DNS directed IP, (209.17.131.72) it won't
work, but if I user an unused IP in our WAN network, it works. That must
be a smoking gun of something...
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 08:02 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> Now that
I think this must be with the switch on the ISP side, and am folowing it
up with them
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 08:08 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> and what is even more screwed...
>
> If I give the ftp server it's DNS directed IP, (209.17.131.72) it won't
> work, but if
Got ISP to clear their ARP cache. All good. What a pain in the rear
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 09:14 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> I think this must be with the switch on the ISP side, and am folowing it
> up with them
>
> On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 08:08 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
I can't even see their gear, it's locked up or i would've just pulled
the power on it, I had to call the ISP.. but it looks like it due to the
TTL
On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 15:24 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 4/28/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> &
Do I need a permit on the WAN interface for passive ports?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Do I need a permit on the WAN interface for passive ports?
No, the FTP helper automatically installs rules.
OK thats what I thought.. I'm seeing this being blocked:
WAN x.x.x.x:52336 10.0
Scott Ullrich wrote:
On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 4/29/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Do I need a permit on the WAN interface for passive ports?
>
> No, the FTP helper automatically insta
should the ftp helper be handling this block?
DMZ 10.0.0.10:20x.x.x.x:55628 TCP
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ok i've now spun myself to a point of being confused..
can i get a brief discussion of what i need to get ftp working; what
changes to the lan and dmz do i need to make?
i've ben playing with this too much that i've lost where i'm going with this
---
I just got back home and was taking a quick look at things before bed,
and for some reason I'm getting an error loading the rule set
exactly -f /tmp/rules.debug
/tmp/rules.debug:95: macro 'opt1' not defined
/tmp/rules.debug:95: syntax error
/tmp/rules.debug:96: macro 'opt1' not defined
/tmp/rul
I just got back home and was taking a quick look at things before bed,
and for some reason I'm getting an error loading the rule set
exactly -f /tmp/rules.debug
/tmp/rules.debug:95: macro 'opt1' not defined
/tmp/rules.debug:95: syntax error
/tmp/rules.debug:96: macro 'opt1' not defined
/tmp/rul
I reverted to a ruleset from yesterday; whatever is causing the issue i'm
having is really odd. i've taken my failover box and am going to rebuild
from scratch
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Scott Ullrich wrote:
cvs_synch.sh again and see if they go away.
On 4/30/06, Derrick MacPhers
ocked:
WAN 208.181.60.36:61044 10.0.0.10:59825 TCP
with passive off:
OPT110.0.0.10:20208.181.60.36:50383 TCP
Now is there something I've missed, or should this be handled by the ftp
helper?
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
I reverted to a ru
4:58 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> Hmm. reaset rules set to default
>
> Added on WAN:
>
> rules to https to Outlook Web Access (OWA) box
> rules for access to Nortel VPN device in the DMZ.
> rule to route traffic from mail relay host in dmz to internal
> rulle t
why are proxy arps used and not aliases on the interfaces?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
How can I find how pass rules are being written the log, yet there's
none turned on?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
there isn't one...
set loginterface fxp0
set loginterface bge0
set loginterface em0
set loginterface em1
block in log proto tcp from to any port 22 label
"sshlockout"
On Tue, 2006-05-02 at 18:39 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 5/2/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTE
I've been having several ongoing problems; passive FTP into the DMZ,
logging of pass packets yet I have no logging turned on, and the latest
is routing from my internal SMTP server to the external SMTP server. The
latest just stopped working for about an hour yesterday, the mail server
when ran
running m0n0wall now with no issues. Not sure why I had issues with
pfsense, maybe when it matures some more I can look at it again
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 06:27 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> I've been having several ongoing problems; passive FTP into the DMZ,
> logging of pass pa
Ya I know, its weird.
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 17:14 +0100, Guilherme Oliveira wrote:
> Don't know what is going on but I have the "same" network as you (lan
> & dmz) with ftp's, ssh's, smtp, voip, ... in dmz running without
> problems.
>
> On 5/5/06,
> This is a known problem. Scott and I are working on it with the
> ftpsesame developer.
Ah, see that's news to me. thanks. now why is that the first time this
has been brought up as a posibility?
> I realize its tempting to say "well this works for
> m0n0wall, so it should work for pfSense",
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 14:55 -0500, Gary Buckmaster wrote:
> Because we've been working on the problem on IRC since the problem was
> first noticed. A lot of little problems (and some big ones) are solved
> before they ever make the list. In fact, we had been working on the
> problem for quite
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 15:52 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> Because these conversations have been taken place on the IRC and it's
> Derby Week in my city. I don't work 24*7 you know.
You would if you really cared about me Scott. ;)
I REALLY appreciate the effort that goes into this, I too underst
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 16:10 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 5/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You would if you really cared about me Scott. ;)
>
> What? Thats complete and utter insanity. I am not your babysitter.
Sorry, sarcasm and other sentim
rich wrote:
> On 5/5/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You would if you really cared about me Scott. ;)
>
> What? Thats complete and utter insanity. I am not your babysitter.
>
> -
IS there any news on the ftpsesame problem that was discussed last week?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Scott... Is there anything that I can do to help?
On Tue, 2006-05-09 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On 5/9/06, Derrick MacPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > IS there any news on the ftpsesame problem that was discussed las
I have a 4801 with laptop hard drive, and when i'm plugged into the
console I see the soekris screens, but as soon as it's start to boot off
the hdd, it turns to muck.. Is there a specific setting I've missed or
not set that will enable me to admin this via the console?
--
I put on my robe and
ya sorry, got it.. it switches to 9600 8n1.
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 17:49 -0700, Derrick MacPherson wrote:
> I have a 4801 with laptop hard drive, and when i'm plugged into the
> console I see the soekris screens, but as soon as it's start to boot off
> the hdd, it turns t
92 matches
Mail list logo
