Re: [pfSense Support] Re: [pfSense 0.88/0.90] Atheros card not bound to driver

2005-11-12 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Problem OK Philips (IBM OEM) OK OK OK TP-Link TL-WN660G Problem Problem OK TP-Link TL-WN560G Problem Problem OK -- ---MAV Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Swiftouch, LTD

[pfSense Support] [pfSense 0.88/0.90] Atheros card not bound to driver

2005-11-11 Thread Marc A. Volovic
of the embedded images). Thanks! Marc -- ---MAV Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Swiftouch, LTD +972-544-676764 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL

Re: [pfSense Support] [pfSense 0.88/0.90] Atheros card not bound to driver

2005-11-11 Thread Marc A. Volovic
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 13:18 -0500, Scott Ullrich wrote: I have heard reports that the newer HAL in later versions makes some ATH cards work that are not reliably probed. Please try: http://www.pfsense.com/~sullrich/?M=D I am afraid the embedded version does not gunzip correctly, failson

RE: [pfSense Support] [pfSense 0.88/0.90] Atheros card not bound to driver

2005-11-11 Thread Marc A. Volovic
On Fri, 2005-11-11 at 22:44 +0100, Espen Johansen wrote: The HAL and drivers are updated in version .92 and newer. This should fix what you are seeing. Just get .93 as soon as it hits the mirrors. Hi. Actually, version 0.90 also had the 0.9.16.3 HAL and the results are reproducible. 0.93 seem

[pfSense Support] WiKi question

2005-11-11 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Hello, Is the http://wiki.pfsense.com/wikka.php?wakka=BuildingpFSense maintained or even in use? I am following it and there are obvious omissions and errors there. Some I have corrected, some I am struggling through and with. Should this be continued? Thanks. Marc

Re: [pfSense Support] WiKi question

2005-11-11 Thread Marc A. Volovic
. But that is learning curve, so ~10 hours on a spare machine is ok... The more sinificant problem is that ./build_* scripts in the tools subdir try to rsync with [EMAIL PROTECTED] and gets bumped off with connection timed out and failure. Is this your build machine? Marc Scott On 11/12/05, Marc A. Volovic

Re: [pfSense Support] WRAP/PfSense PCMCIA :)

2005-11-08 Thread Marc A. Volovic
serial ports. I am not acquainted with Verizon units, tho. -- ---MAV Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Swiftouch, LTD +972-544-676764

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Marc A. Volovic
and configured both on the same net - couldn't access the config page any help would be appreciated JB - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- ---MAV Marc

Re: [pfSense Support] NIC issues

2005-09-29 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Quoth J B: As for the Intel Pro - different system - that system I was using 1 Intel Pro 100 (stand alone), 1 Linksys Fast eth (shows up as dc0) and a 3com 3c509 In my case, the device name is fxp -- ---MAV Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] Swiftouch

[pfSense Support] PIMv2 protocol

2005-09-10 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Hello. Is it possible to act on PIMv2 protocol from the GUI - or should I address it otherwise. To be sure, pf itself sees and knows PIMv2. As you know, PIMv1 is in IGMP and it is easy to clobber THAT ;-). Thanks - To

Re: [pfSense Support] PIMv2 protocol

2005-09-10 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Quoth Marc A. Volovic: Is it possible to act on PIMv2 protocol from the GUI - or should I address it otherwise. To be sure, pf itself sees and knows PIMv2. Actually, I am looking at hacking it into firewall_rules_edit.php, so if anyone is working on it, please tell me? Marc

Re: [pfSense Support] PIMv2 protocol

2005-09-10 Thread Marc A. Volovic
Quoth Scott Ullrich: On 9/10/05, Marc A. Volovic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Actually, I am looking at hacking it [PIMv2] into firewall_rules_edit.php, so if anyone is working on it, please tell me? It's safe to say that nobody is working on this that I know of. So - now I need