Re: [pfSense Support] Test-Upgrade from 1.2.3 to 2.0RC3 Alix

2011-06-26 Thread Markus Winkler
On 26.06.2011 13:26 Klaus Lichtenwalder wrote: > Can you show headers? I definitely sent it only once No problem here. I received it only once. Regards, Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-unsubscr...@pfsense.com For additi

Re: [pfSense Support] COM-port Watchguard Firebox X500 with 2.0-RC1

2011-05-08 Thread Markus Winkler
On 08.05.2011 02:48 Dimitri Rodis wrote: > Even if you get the console to work, you are still going to get > watchdog timeouts on the NICs of this unit, which is something that I > have been working with the driver maintainer on for quite some time > in order to try and fix. Do you know if this is

Re: [pfSense Support] COM-port Watchguard Firebox X500 with 2.0-RC1

2011-05-08 Thread Markus Winkler
On 08.05.2011 00:30 Jim Cheetham wrote: >>> Bootup complete >> >> ... and now we should see the login command shell. > > And what happens if you press return a couple of times at this point? I already tried this but nothing happens. Regards, Markus --

Re: [pfSense Support] COM-port Watchguard Firebox X500 with 2.0-RC1

2011-05-08 Thread Markus Winkler
On 08.05.2011 00:12 Jim Cheetham wrote: > So your problem is a more serious one, the console login shell isn't > running. > > I'd recommend booting your pfSense image in a virtual machine to see > what happens there. If the same thing occurs, it will be easier to hunt > for log file entries than f

Re: [pfSense Support] COM-port Watchguard Firebox X500 with 2.0-RC1

2011-05-06 Thread Markus Winkler
Jim, thank you very much for your reply. On Fri, 06 May 2011 at 08:43:33AM +1200, Jim Cheetham wrote: > However that doesn't sound quite like the original report, especially as > his Firebox worked on 1.2.3. Markus, what output do you get? See below. In between and according to some docus I fou

Re: [pfSense Support] COM-port Watchguard Firebox X500 with 2.0-RC1

2011-05-06 Thread Markus Winkler
Hi Frank, On Thu, 05 May 2011 at 05:15:42PM +0200, Frank Heydlauf wrote: > My console speed changes during the boot from 9600 to 38400 > (alix.2d13 board). Maybe same problem in your case. thanks for the hint. Unfortunately it doesn't help. I already tried some usual speeds (among them 38400), bu

[pfSense Support] COM-port Watchguard Firebox X500 with 2.0-RC1

2011-05-05 Thread Markus Winkler
Hi, I have some Firebox X500 running with pfSense 1.2.3 without any problem. No I tried 2.0-RC1 (nanobsd) on such a box. The systems boots and allows initial setup via console cable. But after reporting that the boot is complete, no more output is showing via serial console (the GUI via Web is ac

Re: [pfSense Support] List Posting Etiquette

2011-03-08 Thread Markus Winkler
Sorry for the wrong subject line in my first reply - sent without checking it first. Obviously my MUA tried to "repair" Yehuda's subject (parenthesis <-> square brackets). Hmm. Regards, Markus - To unsubscribe, e-mail: support-un

Re: [pfSense Support] Re: Intel Gigabit - em0: Watchdog Timeout

2011-03-08 Thread Markus Winkler
On 08.03.2011 16:02 Yehuda Katz wrote: > >> Been there, done that. This is a drive problem. Here is how to fix > > Is it too much to request that when you post to this list about a > new issue, that you use a descriptive subject line? IMHO it isn't a new topic as the last posts talked about poss

Re: [pfSense Support] embedded devices

2010-02-14 Thread Markus Winkler
On 13.02.2010 13:45 Dominik Schips wrote: > > So I think if you can handle the NanoBSD booting problem you should try > it before buying new hardware. > It is well documentet at > http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/NanoBSD_on_WRAP Yes, I already read this. But as I wrote to Gary I think in the end

Re: [pfSense Support] embedded devices

2010-02-14 Thread Markus Winkler
On 13.02.2010 21:41 Gary Buckmaster wrote: > The limitations you're referring to are exclusive to the WRAP. OK. > PCEngines ended support for the device and so they haven't released a > firmware to support packetmode, which is necessary for the newer Yep, and that's my main concern: EOL. They

[pfSense Support] embedded devices

2010-02-13 Thread Markus Winkler
Hi, I'm new here and would like to ask you something about the use of pfSense on embedded devices, especially on PC Engines WRAP/ALIX boards. In the wiki I read that there are a) some functional limitations and b) a special handling of booting necessary when using WRAP boards (which I used a long