On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 02:54, Mark Jones mjo...@imagehawk.com wrote:
Well, I hear of people running pfSense in a VM, and I wonder how do you avoid
exposing the host OS to the network? How can a firewall be run in a VM and
not leave the host OS hanging out to be attacked? Or, go the otherway
I agree with Jim.
A firewall box should be exclusively a firewall, no matter how 'stout'
it is. More components == more attack surface area. Not to mention the
intricacies of interaction that might bollix the firewall's mechanisms
in a non-repeatable way.
Better to put all analysis packages in
Have you configured the Cisco router with a static route to the XP's network?
Rgds,
On 2011-01-21, Danny metal...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I´ve got a 1.2.3 pfSense connected this way:
XP [LAN] PFSense [WAN] --- [WAN] Cisco router [LAN]
I can ping from XP to LAN and WAN pfsense
,
virtual XP, with VMWare using GNS3... maybe that causes that weird
behaviour.
thanks a lot
Rgards
On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Have you configured the Cisco router with a static route to the XP's
network?
Rgds,
On 2011-01-21, Danny metal
Although I never found myself in a situation where I need to have an
auto-revert, I can see how this will be useful for some. Or for
myself, someday.
Rgds,
On 2011-01-14, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Charles N Wyble
char...@knownelement.com wrote:
Yes, I've setup NAT for TCP/UDP. No joy.
Rgds,
--
Pandu E Poluan
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 15:22, Chris Buechler cbuech...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 12:58 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Hello again!
I think I'm having trouble with VIP.
The scenario is this (IP
TCP and UDPCan you share the
screen shot of your firewall rule..?
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Yes, I was accessing the external IP address from a different network.
E.g. The 100.x.y.z is on ISP A, I tried to access it from a computer
with IP 200
blackened nets are 192.168.1.
Rgds,
--Pandu E Poluan
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 15:22, Abdulrehman arvagabo...@gmail.com wrote:
ok...for DNS...you need to allow both TCP and UDPCan you share the
screen shot of your firewall rule..?
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:18 PM, Pandu Poluan pa
Hello again!
I think I'm having trouble with VIP.
The scenario is this (IP addresses obfuscated):
+ WAN address is 100.2.2.8/25
+ LAN address is 192.168.1.1/24
+ I create a VIP, CARP, 100.2.2.9/25
Now, I tried to make a NAT:
+ 100.2.2.9:53 forwards to 192.168.1.20:53
+ A firewall rule is
input very much.
Rgds,
--
Pandu E Poluan
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 09:42, Jesse Vollmar vollm...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:32 PM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
Hello,
I am planning to deploy pfSense, mostly for firewall and NAT, on my
production Cloud. It is based
10 matches
Mail list logo
