as i'm sure you know, that book is based on the 1.x version. if you are
using 2.x or about to, it may cause some confusion as things have been
moved/changed...
perhaps they have an errata update you can download or will...
-g
On Thu, Sep 1, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Ryan Rodrigue wrote:
> Get it
Thanks Chris. this is for an internal 'sandbox' environment for
employees with another firewall before the internet. I've set up many DHCP
servers on unix with multiple scopes, guess i figured it could be done here
since its a unix router.
anyway, so i have my answer, thanks much!
greg
ur
> pfSense box) for DHCP relaying.
>
> ** **
>
> Cheers,
>
> ** **
>
> Jochem
>
> ** **
> --
>
> *Van:* greg whynott [mailto:greg.whyn...@gmail.com]
> *Verzonden:* maandag 29 augustus 2011 22:05
> *Aan:
Hi,
Is it possible to have the pfSence fw provide DHCP services to a network
which lives one hop beyond the pfsence's INSIDE directly connected network?
On the router i configured an ip-helper address, i then went to configure
the pfsecne's DHCP service but it is complaining about the network n
looks like you have a windows client that was unable to get an address from
your dhcp server and is sending out service discovery stuff..
but i could be wrong. 8)
-g
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 11:56 AM, k_o_l wrote:
> My syslog server is being filled with the following generated by
> pfsense-
re all in the same network
> 192.168.2.0 ( /24 = 255.255.255.0).
>
>
> 2011/8/26 greg whynott
>
>> they are all /24 networks.all interfaces are configured with the same
>> mask/network on that side of the device. Should it help, the setup
>> works(fail over) wh
es EL AMRAOUI wrote:
> what the CIDR of every gateway?
>
>
>
> 2011/8/26 greg whynott
>
>> why are you saying this? I don't belive i am. the gateways are .1 and
>> .2. there is only 2 interfaces on the box, one on a 10.x network and the
>> other in the
why are you saying this? I don't belive i am. the gateways are .1 and .2.
there is only 2 interfaces on the box, one on a 10.x network and the other
in the 192.x network.
-g
>
>
> You can not use the same gateway address on multiple interfaces.
>
>
>
Hi,
Yes I did. I mentioned this in my post.
thanks,
greg
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Younes EL AMRAOUI wrote:
> Hi,
> Did you use the gateway group in firewall rules??
>
>
> 2011/8/25 greg whynott
>
>>Under Firewall rules I added a 'pass all' rul
Hi,
We have 2 DSL modems connected to the same network (192.168.2.1 and .2 ) as
the pfsence box is connected to (192.168.2.10). I've configured them into a
Gateway group after defining the 2 under the 'gateway' tab (system -
routing) and assigned them all the same 'Tier 1' level.Under Firewal
Thank you very much for your responce Jim. Things are working well now.
have a great day,
greg
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 5:49 PM, Jim Pingle wrote:
> On 8/17/2011 4:32 PM, greg whynott wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just installed a fresh copy of 2.0-RC3 for a client to
Hi,
I just installed a fresh copy of 2.0-RC3 for a client to segergate the vm
sandbox enviroment. We are not using NAT, rather just routing. My
intention was to configure some basic fw rules afterwards.
During the setup, I turned off NAT via the "disable firewall" option
(system-advanced-fir
12 matches
Mail list logo
