On 22 Feb 2011 21:38, Nathan Eisenberg nat...@atlasnetworks.us wrote:
Almost certainly not. The update communication is done over an SSL
channel and specific ports. Even if you get the ports right,
Why wouldn't you, they're not random, you set them youself?!
I highly suspect the SSL
I doubt it, why would the SSL cause problems unless you denied clients
authentication, but why would you deny access to your own clients?!?
You probably don't have the ability to sign valid certificates for
update.microsoft.com. Since you're redirecting SSL traffic bound for that
That is a possibility, perhps instead of NAT'ing the connections if you had
a local DNS entry for update.microsoft.com though I suspect SSL woupd be
fine. However I believe SSL is optional, so that might not be a problem at
all?
--James. (This email was sent from a mobile device)
See the official Squid FAQ about Windows Update. It explains why you are
having this problem.
http://wiki.squid-cache.org/SquidFaq/WindowsUpdate
Moshe
--
Moshe Katz
-- mo...@ymkatz.net
-- +1(301)867-3732
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Shali K.R.
this done at dozens of installations, and it works
flawlessly.
-Original Message-
From: James Bensley [mailto:jwbens...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 12:57 AM
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Microsoft updates through pfSense
Well I haven't tried
David Burgess schreef:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Shali K.R.sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote:
Dear db,
i have tried this, but it showing a high bandwidth usage, is this a proper
way??
I uninstalled the squid package about three months ago, unable to get
it to function properly. I will
If you cant use a domain with a WSUS server, why not redirect the IP ranges
of MS update servers to your WSUS server on your firewall?
--James. (This email was sent from a mobile device)
Dear James Bensley,
Just redirect to local WSUS server will solve this issue?
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 2:06 PM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote:
If you cant use a domain with a WSUS server, why not redirect the IP ranges
of MS update servers to your WSUS server on your firewall?
Well I haven't tried it but it could work, perhaps Google it? Initially I
can't see why it wouldn't work but I haven't tried it so I can't say for
sure.
--James. (This email was sent from a mobile device)
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote:
Dear all,
I am having 500 windows client machines connected through pfSense and squid,
please suggest me a suitable method for handling updates.
You'll find the appropriate info here:
Dear db,
i have tried this, but it showing a high bandwidth usage, is this a proper
way??
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:14 AM, David Burgess apt@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:42 PM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in
wrote:
Dear all,
I am having 500 windows client machines
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Shali K.R. sh...@vidyaacademy.ac.in wrote:
Dear db,
i have tried this, but it showing a high bandwidth usage, is this a proper
way??
I uninstalled the squid package about three months ago, unable to get
it to function properly. I will try it again when pfsense
The proper way to handle that many clients is to run a WSUS update server
(or its new replacement, System Center).
Mike McLaughlin - System Administrator
Clientworks, Inc - 721 Zion St, Nevada City, CA 95959
Office 530-470-0104 - Cell 530-559-9606
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 7:52 PM, Shali K.R.
Dear Mike McLaughlin,
But WSUS requires a domain controller for the perfect functioning, i also
tried this without domain controller but its not working well
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Mike McLaughlin obr...@gmail.com wrote:
The proper way to handle that many clients is to run a
Ah, sorry. I don't have a great recommendation for you then. I've not used a
WSUS server without a domain.
You can tune squid to cache larger files, but I too am not extremely fond of
Squid. I always have random issues with this and that running it (mainly
custom web apps, java, etc).
Mike
15 matches
Mail list logo
