On 10/15/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure I follow with the redirection part.But if I understandcorrectly, yes we can use both ipfw and pf in conjunction fordifferent tasks.This is how our shaper code used to work - define
the queues in PF and assign the traffic in IPFW.Our
On 10/16/05, Tommaso Di Donato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 10/15/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure I follow with the redirection part. But if I understand
correctly, yes we can use both ipfw and pf in conjunction for
different tasks. This is how our shaper code used
You are very kind, in responding so fast!!
Module probably isn't loaded (it's only loaded if CP is in use Ibelieve).
Mmmh, I think it is (I loaded it by hand with kldload ipfw.ko):
# kldstat
Id Refs Address Size Name
1 4 0xc040 68cca0 kernel
2 16 0xc0a8d000 55fdc acpi.ko
3 1 0xc25e2000 c000
On 10/16/05, Bill Marquette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Got it, now I understand the problem (makes sense, I was wondering howit did transparent proxy w/out access to the destination IP:) ).Sobasically, it does a state lookup on the socket connected to it and
figures out what the original IP was
Just a question.. I would like to ask one more thing: rule-based
forwarding disabled in dmesg (ipfw2 (+ipv6) initialized, divert
loadable, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to accept, logging
disabled)
means that pfsense kernel is compiled without this option (IP-FIREWALL_FORWARD)?
Maybe
Reinstall from scratch on the latest version. Your IPFW module is
wrong. It should say rule based forwarding enabled.
On 10/16/05, Tommaso Di Donato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a question.. I would like to ask one more thing: rule-based forwarding
disabled in dmesg (ipfw2 (+ipv6)
Thank you very very much!! ( I forgot to mention I am developing on version 0.84...)
Thanx again!On 10/16/05, Scott Ullrich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reinstall from scratch on the latest version. Your IPFW module iswrong. It should say rule based forwarding enabled.On 10/16/05, Tommaso Di Donato
Hi!
I recently read a post about captive portal, and the related use of
ipfw. If I understood well, it is possible to use at the same time pf
and ipfw. Is it true? I mean, can I use ipfw for doing a particular
king of traffic redirection, even there is another redirection done
with pf (of course,
