Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-09 Thread Chris Buechler
On Fri, Mar 5, 2010 at 8:44 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote: > After > ifconfig -txcsum I have no more bad checksum errors and the slow > connection times I was seeing are no more! > The former may or may not mean anything - it's normal to have bad checksums with checksum offloading enabled (they normally

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-05 Thread Hiren Joshi
Message- > From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] > Sent: 03 March 2010 22:42 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection > > On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Hiren Joshi > wrote: > > Initial results seem interestin

Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-03 Thread Chris Buechler
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote: > Initial results seem interesting, I get a few bad header checksums > (0x) so it looks like something is clearing them (tho not all). I'm > also getting duplicate acks from the client so these checksum errors are > being transmitted. This cou

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-03 Thread Hiren Joshi
shi > Sent: 02 March 2010 17:55 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection > > I have many sites with different domain names all with the > same IP. I am > now realising that I won't be able to get this information > from tcpdum

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-02 Thread Hiren Joshi
> -Original Message- > From: David Burgess [mailto:apt@gmail.com] > Sent: 02 March 2010 17:51 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Hiren Joshi > wrote: > > On second tho

Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-02 Thread David Burgess
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote: > On second thoughts, I'll take that back. It looks like the front end is > matching all hosts with that IP, now I'm stumped... I don't understand. You have several remote hosts with the same IP address and same host name? db -

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-02 Thread Hiren Joshi
On second thoughts, I'll take that back. It looks like the front end is matching all hosts with that IP, now I'm stumped... > -Original Message- > From: Hiren Joshi > Sent: 02 March 2010 17:43 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TC

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-02 Thread Hiren Joshi
om] > Sent: 02 March 2010 16:08 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection > > On 3/2/10 7:59 AM, David Burgess wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Hiren Joshi > wrote: > > > >> I'm using the "packet captu

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-02 Thread Hiren Joshi
Oh I see, this is the Unix system I know this! =) Sorry for the blond moment, the interface names confused me. > -Original Message- > From: David Burgess [mailto:apt@gmail.com] > Sent: 02 March 2010 15:59 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Su

Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-02 Thread David Newman
On 3/2/10 7:59 AM, David Burgess wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote: > >> I'm using the "packet capture" bit in pfsense. Is there a way of doing >> this via the shell (I'm new to BSD, more of a Linux person) and leaving >> it running (filtered by hostname) for a few hours/

Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-02 Thread David Burgess
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 8:54 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote: > I'm using the "packet capture" bit in pfsense. Is there a way of doing > this via the shell (I'm new to BSD, more of a Linux person) and leaving > it running (filtered by hostname) for a few hours/days? This way I can > dump it all and analyse

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-02 Thread Hiren Joshi
it all and analyse it in wireshark. Thanks, Josh. > -Original Message- > From: Chris Buechler [mailto:cbuech...@gmail.com] > Sent: 02 March 2010 05:31 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection > > On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Hire

Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-01 Thread Chris Buechler
On Mon, Mar 1, 2010 at 5:24 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote: > I'm not hitting the max states (this is set to a high enough number) and > a tcp dump is impractical as this is not a consistent failure. > tcpdump is never impractical. :) In fact it's really the only way you're going to get any further with

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-03-01 Thread Hiren Joshi
com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection > > Hiren Joshi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm running a load of performance tests and I've found that > one in every > > 100 odd TCP connections takes a few seconds to make the > initial call. >

Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-02-26 Thread Evgeny Yurchenko
Hiren Joshi wrote: Hi, I'm running a load of performance tests and I've found that one in every 100 odd TCP connections takes a few seconds to make the initial call. Once the connection has been established things go quickly but the initial connection sometimes hangs for a second or two. Can so

RE: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-02-26 Thread Hiren Joshi
e.com Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection Have you enabled Traffic Shapper? On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Hiren Joshi wrote: Hi, I'm running a load of performance

Re: [pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-02-26 Thread Abdulrehman
Have you enabled Traffic Shapper? On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Hiren Joshi wrote: > Hi, > > I'm running a load of performance tests and I've found that one in every > 100 odd TCP connections takes a few seconds to make the initial call. > Once the connection has been established things g

[pfSense Support] Slow TCP connection

2010-02-26 Thread Hiren Joshi
Hi, I'm running a load of performance tests and I've found that one in every 100 odd TCP connections takes a few seconds to make the initial call. Once the connection has been established things go quickly but the initial connection sometimes hangs for a second or two. Can someone point me in the