Thanks, we found a workaround with SLB, so we wont go for haproxy right now.
El 30/11/10 18:01, Chris Buechler escribió:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:39 AM, LM wrote:
Hi, I would like to use haproxy over pfsense 1.2.3 to check a pool of
servers over TCP.
is it stable and reliable enough?
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 11:39 AM, LM wrote:
> Hi, I would like to use haproxy over pfsense 1.2.3 to check a pool of
> servers over TCP.
> is it stable and reliable enough?
>
Works great, there are large sites using it in production.
---
Hi, I would like to use haproxy over pfsense 1.2.3 to check a pool of
servers over TCP.
is it stable and reliable enough?
Right now we are using the load balancer included in the pfsense with
the TCP check but for some reason it is giving false negatives for the
checks and some servers are rem
nt: 06 August 2010 06:42
> To: support@pfsense.com
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] haproxy
>
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Hiren Joshi
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm running a master/slave setup of 1.2.3 and about to
> install haproxy,
> > I h
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 7:39 AM, Hiren Joshi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm running a master/slave setup of 1.2.3 and about to install haproxy,
> I have 2 options under packages:
> BETA-0.29
> and
> BETA-0.30
>
> My question, why is the newer one marked as "stable"?
>
As we were doing some work on the packa
Hi,
I'm running a master/slave setup of 1.2.3 and about to install haproxy,
I have 2 options under packages:
BETA-0.29
and
BETA-0.30
My question, why is the newer one marked as "stable"?
Thanks,
Josh.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On Dec 19, 2007 11:12 AM, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> now pfsense 1.2 full release is hopefully pretty much ready to roll, I
> was hoping I could place my vote on this as a really good feature to add
> for 1.3-rc1! I think it would add a valuable feature to pfsense future
> versions.
Scott Ullrich wrote:
> On Nov 22, 2007 5:29 AM, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> is there a port of haproxy (or equivalent) to run on pfsense, and if so
>> does it work reliably?
...
>> we previously used pound as a load balancer and it works well, but we
...
> On my TODO list is to convert us
On Nov 22, 2007 5:29 AM, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> is there a port of haproxy (or equivalent) to run on pfsense, and if so
> does it work reliably?
Not at the moment.
> we previously used pound as a load balancer and it works well, but we
> need a load balancer which can do more than ju
is there a port of haproxy (or equivalent) to run on pfsense, and if so
does it work reliably?
we previously used pound as a load balancer and it works well, but we
need a load balancer which can do more than just detect that there's a
tcp listener, in case our web app stops working but still list
10 matches
Mail list logo
