On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jeppe Øland wrote:
> Every time I'm in Europe I have problems with modem/routers, and since
> a lot of providers there use PPPoA I basically can't replace them :-(
>
> Are there any modems that allow a box like pfSense to provide the
> PPPoA implementation, or woul
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 5:45 PM, David Burgess wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko
> wrote:
>
>> I understand double-nat thing and can certainly configure that,
>> but the simpler the better, I'd prefer to have public IP (range) on pfSense
>> box.
>
> Best case scenario yo
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 3:29 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> I understand double-nat thing and can certainly configure that,
> but the simpler the better, I'd prefer to have public IP (range) on pfSense
> box.
Best case scenario you get a public IP on pfsense, but worst case you
can turn off NAT i
On 10-12-17 04:59 PM, David Bottrill wrote:
On 17 Dec 2010, at 21:45, Michel Servaes wrote:
On 18/12/10 10:16, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
my only concern now is PPPoA... But I need public IP on pfSense for sure
to do port-forwarding.
Not really; if you can ask the modem to port-forward to the pf
On 17 Dec 2010, at 21:45, Michel Servaes wrote:
> On 18/12/10 10:16, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
>>> my only concern now is PPPoA... But I need public IP on pfSense for sure
>>> to do port-forwarding.
>> Not really; if you can ask the modem to port-forward to the pfsense box,
>> you can then ask pfSe
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Michel Servaes wrote:
> On 18/12/10 10:16, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
>>>
>>> my only concern now is PPPoA... But I need public IP on pfSense for sure
>>> to do port-forwarding.
>>
>> Not really; if you can ask the modem to port-forward to the pfsense box,
>> you can
On 18/12/10 10:16, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
my only concern now is PPPoA... But I need public IP on pfSense for sure
to do port-forwarding.
Not really; if you can ask the modem to port-forward to the pfsense box,
you can then ask pfSense to port-forward to the final destination.
So the public IP
On 18/12/10 10:16, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> my only concern now is PPPoA... But I need public IP on pfSense for sure
> to do port-forwarding.
Not really; if you can ask the modem to port-forward to the pfsense box,
you can then ask pfSense to port-forward to the final destination.
So the public
On 10-12-17 02:54 PM, Michel Servaes wrote:
Can I reconfigure Netgear in 'bridge' mode so I get Public IP on pfSense WAN? What would be WAN type on pfSense
(DHCP? static? PPPoE?)?
Or if you can answer more generally what is genereal pfSense set up if you get
DSL line from ISP?
Thanks.
Can'
Can I reconfigure Netgear in 'bridge' mode so I get Public IP on
pfSense WAN? What would be WAN type on pfSense (DHCP? static? PPPoE?)?
Or if you can answer more generally what is genereal pfSense set up if
you get DSL line from ISP?
Thanks.
Can't tell for netgear, but I have 5 locations wit
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:39 PM, Evgeny Yurchenko wrote:
> Or if you can answer more generally what is genereal pfSense set up if you
> get DSL line from ISP?
I'm not familiar with that Netgear or PPPoA. My DSL uses PPPoE, and I
have two options for handling that login:
1. modem in bridge mod
Hi list,
never worked with dsl devices so the question might seem stupid.
Nevertheless...
now Netgear DG834 does PPPoA with ISP having 192.168.0.1 on LAN and Public IP
on WAN.
How would I introduce pfSense to firewall LAN from WAN here?
Can I reconfigure Netgear in 'bridge' mode so I get Public I
12 matches
Mail list logo
