Thanks to everyone who responded for their enlightening answers.
- Joel
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:40 PM, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If I was able to read and understand the source, I would probably be
contributing to it. Isn't there usually an oversight process in
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:40 PM, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I was able to read and understand the source, I would probably be
> contributing to it. Isn't there usually an oversight process in which source
> commits are reviewed by someone before being accepted? Otherwise someone
> could
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:40 PM, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If I was able to read and understand the source, I would probably be
> contributing to it. Isn't there usually an oversight process in which source
> commits are reviewed by someone before being accepted? Otherwise someone
> could
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 16:40, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If I was able to read and understand the source, I would probably be
> contributing to it.
It really doesn't take that much, you don't even have to be a
programmer per se. Reading source code may speed up the process, but
identifying
Olivier Nicole wrote:
sai wrote:
I just realised that I've been trusting random people I dont know to
develop my production firewalls
You are right, don't trust them. This is open source, go and read the
source, there is never enough people to help proof reading :)
Olivier
--
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sai wrote:
>>> I just realised that I've been trusting random people I dont know to
>>> develop my production firewalls
>>
>> You are right,
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 6:57 AM, Olivier Nicole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sai wrote:
>> I just realised that I've been trusting random people I dont know to
>> develop my production firewalls
>
> You are right, don't trust them. This is open source, go and read the
> source, there is never e
sai wrote:
> I just realised that I've been trusting random people I dont know to
> develop my production firewalls
You are right, don't trust them. This is open source, go and read the
source, there is never enough people to help proof reading :)
Olivier
sai wrote:
> I just realised that I've been trusting random people I dont know to
> develop my production firewalls
you're trusting random people you don't know to run the internet on
which your job depends.
-
To unsubscribe
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:29 PM, Vick Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hello
>> Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?
>
> If you're asking random people you don't know if it is secure enough, th
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 1:18 PM, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> 1. Were all the known 1.2.1 bugs resolved last weekend as you hoped in the
> above message?
As far as we know, yes. Still one thing with grub to find a solution
for, that's the last remaining 1.2.1 item.
> 2. Would you consider
Chris Buechler wrote:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hello
Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?
I think the others who replied may have misunderstood your intent, it
appears you aren't a native English speaker, and may hav
Mikel Jimenez wrote:
Hello
Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?
Is the bge driver bug (blocking iLo shared NIC) solved?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?
>
I think the others who replied may have misunderstood your intent, it
appears you aren't a native English speaker, and may have intended to
ask if it's saf
Thank you for that, Chris, I was a little hasty with my reply so I
apologize. Not enough caffeine for 8:45 AM :)
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com
On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:03 PM, Chris Buechler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 6:08 AM, Mikel Jimenez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello
> Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?
>
If you're asking random people you don't know if it is secure enough, then
yes, it is secure enough for you. If you really want to know if it is
"secure"
It would depend on what your definition of secure is. For 99.8% of the
world, yes. For the other .2% who are wackjobs, maybe. Just remember, like
all firewalls, it's only as secure as the rules YOU enter allow...
Curtis LaMasters
http://www.curtis-lamasters.com
http://www.builtnetworks.com
On
Hello
Is secure to put pfsense 1.2.1 in production enviroment?
Thanks
--
Mikel Jimenez
Irontec, Internet y Sistemas sobre GNU/LinuX - http://www.irontec.com
+34 94.404.81.82
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
18 matches
Mail list logo
