Bill Marquette wrote:
On 9/25/07, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
no, it says the IP is already in the list and refuses to add it; I guess
that javascript could be changed to say "are you sure" and make it possible.
Hmmm, the hackathon is coming up in a couple weeks. I'll take a loo
Bill Marquette wrote:
> On 9/25/07, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> no, it says the IP is already in the list and refuses to add it; I guess
>>> that javascript could be changed to say "are you sure" and make it possible.
>> Hmmm, the hackathon is coming up in a couple weeks. I'll ta
On 9/25/07, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > no, it says the IP is already in the list and refuses to add it; I guess
> > that javascript could be changed to say "are you sure" and make it possible.
>
> Hmmm, the hackathon is coming up in a couple weeks. I'll take a look
> at this the
Bill Marquette wrote:
> Yep, again, the load balance itself is performed in kernel. pf itself
> doesn't really care about icmp unreachables (and that only addresses
> the issue of Apache going down, not of the whole box crashing).
OK, thanks for that clarification.
BTW, we've been testing with a
On 9/25/07, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> p.s. does the load balancer have any sort of session affinity?
Not really. Under System->Advanced you can turn on sticky sessions,
but that only works for a user as long as they still has active TCP
states on the firewall to an existing server. We
On 9/25/07, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> 2/ why didn't pfsense pick up the dead unit when I connected and know to
> >> redirect, or at least only fail the once?
> > Nope. The load balancing is performed by pf which has no concept of
> > dead servers. The actual monitoring is performed i
p.s. does the load balancer have any sort of session affinity?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Marquette wrote:
>> Thus I would like to ask
>> 1/ how quickly should pfsense discover one of the units in the pool is dead?
>
> 5 seconds
thanks for that. From my limited testing that's what I observed. I'm
told we can live with that. I must admit to being lazy^W overworked,
trying to find
On 9/24/07, Paul M <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> Having successfully used pfsense as a clustered firewall with CARP for
> external and internal shared IPs, I am trying its load balancing feature
> to manage a pool of web servers.
>
> So, created a pool with 2 httpd's, and it works. However, wh
Hi,
Having successfully used pfsense as a clustered firewall with CARP for
external and internal shared IPs, I am trying its load balancing feature
to manage a pool of web servers.
So, created a pool with 2 httpd's, and it works. However, when I killed
httpd on one box, I got a few errors when con
10 matches
Mail list logo
