Generally each block is a gateway and a broadcast IP address losing
you 2 of the addresses . It seems logical to me you may need to have 2
gateways for the 2 blocks and need 2 interfaces. It may be that the
ISP routes the addresses to your gateway and you only need one though?
If it works w
> on the same subnet - why would that not be the case?
Well, my ISP told me that we have different subnets because the
request for 16 block public ip's was made on different dates and
it's not possible to change now.
I've tested this setup on IpCop and worked.
Wonder if this run on pfSense :)
@pfsense.com
Betreff: Re: AW: [pfSense Support] IP Aliases
> With CARP it's working here :-)
Tell me please, if yours 8 public ip's are in the same
subnet that the real ip of wan interface.
In your environment, the ip of wan interface is 195.22.21.
and the public ip's are in 195.22.20.
You are going to have to have the wan and the block of IPs (WAN ips)
on the same subnet - why would that not be the case?
If you have multiple IP ranges you need to have multiple WAN
interfaces - which I believe is possible although I haven't done it
myself.
Also make sure you have the righ
> With CARP it's working here :-)
Tell me please, if yours 8 public ip's are in the same
subnet that the real ip of wan interface.
In your environment, the ip of wan interface is 195.22.21.
and the public ip's are in 195.22.20. Not in same subnet.
In pfSense manual tell that "...the virtual ip a
With CARP it's working here :-)
Ok, we just have 8 IPs but more should also be suitable...
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Paulo Almeida [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Montag, 3. März 2008 11:44
An: support@pfsense.com
Betreff: [pfSense Support] IP Aliases
Hi,
We have a Watchguard
