Re: [pfSense Support] Recent snapshot on a DELL PowerEdge SC 1425

2007-03-06 Thread Vivek Khera
On Mar 6, 2007, at 3:12 AM, Christian Krützfeldt wrote: Strange thing is, Monowall has no problem with it. FreeBSD 4's drivers for NICs are wy different the bge driver in 6.x seems to have more timing issues, but then it supports way more chipsets. smime.p7s Description: S/MIM

RE: [pfSense Support] Recent snapshot on a DELL PowerEdge SC 1425

2007-03-06 Thread Christian Krützfeldt
tomorrow. Thanks for your suggestions, Christian > -Original Message- > From: Vivek Khera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Montag, 5. März 2007 17:41 > To: support@pfsense.com > Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] Recent snapshot on a DELL > PowerEdge SC 1425 > > &g

Re: [pfSense Support] Recent snapshot on a DELL PowerEdge SC 1425

2007-03-05 Thread Vivek Khera
On Mar 5, 2007, at 11:05 AM, Dan Farrell wrote: Possible tangent (apologies)- I haven't tried any BSD variants on the current Dell PowerEdge series, but I have tried Fedora, CentOS, and Suse, and had problems with the built-in NIC on all of them. Are you using this built-in NIC in your bri

RE: [pfSense Support] Recent snapshot on a DELL PowerEdge SC 1425

2007-03-05 Thread Dan Farrell
Possible tangent (apologies)- I haven't tried any BSD variants on the current Dell PowerEdge series, but I have tried Fedora, CentOS, and Suse, and had problems with the built-in NIC on all of them. Are you using this built-in NIC in your bridge? Are you able to have it work alright in pfSense o