On 1/25/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are there any plans to expand IPSec to support
> more VPN/phase 1 and 2 options ... like say:
>
> Compression
> &
> IKE Encryption:
> AES 256
> Twofish 256
> Serpent 256
> &
> ESP Encryption:
> AES 256
> Twofish 256
> Serpent 256
> &
> IKE Integ
L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec
enhancements ??s
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-25-2006 11:44 pm
> I did your research for you because I was
curious. I'd suggest you
> look a litt
On 1/26/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then my question to you is this why haven't
> they been implemented?
Because nobody has submitted patches?
> You've / we've all spent a lot of time on the
> product to make it ( and I quote) a business class
> product which "provides all
On 1/26/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Then my question to you is this why haven't
> they been implemented?
It doesn't interest me.
--Bill
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
ng Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec enhancements
??s
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-26-2006 3:46 pm
On 1/26/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Then my question to
Long time listener, first time caller. Bearded, black-wearing,
anti-social, White Zombie & Otep-listening security professional.
I'm not going to quote the precise statement because it's not worth
repeating, but it's rather obvious that you're not making much headway
with your suggestion beca
I wasn't planning on responding any further to this thread, but after
a little thought decided it would be good FAQ entry (I'll let someone
else submit it, I'm too tired tonight). The developers that work on
pfSense do so because it interests them. Making it perfect for
everyone isn't necessarily
http://faq.pfsense.com/index.php?action=artikel&cat=1&id=126&artlang=en
On 1/27/06, Bill Marquette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wasn't planning on responding any further to this thread, but after
> a little thought decided it would be good FAQ entry (I'll let someone
> else submit it, I'm too ti
Ah no ... it appears that there is NOT the same
level(s) of VPN crypts/hashes/features for the
xBSD realm as there are for say the Linux realm.
Again appologies for the noise !!
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec
crypts/hashes/features for the
> xBSD realm as there are for say the Linux realm.
>
> Again appologies for the noise !!
>
> --
> David L. Strout
> Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
>
> - Original Message -
> Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec enhancements
> ??
EAT work (devs, community,
Manuel).
Regards,
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec enhancements
??s
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-26-2006 3:15 pm
> On 1/26/06, David Strout <[EMAIL
Case-in-point
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec enhancements
??s
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: support@pfsense.com
Date: 01-26-2006 3:46 pm
> On 1/26/06, David Strout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
&g
0:15
To: "support@pfsense.com"
Subject: Re: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec enhancements ??s
Case-in-point
--
David L. Strout
Engineering Systems Plus, LLC
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec enhancements
??s
developers would be great so if you are putting up your hand I am
sure you could be considered.
Alan
-Original Message-
From: David Strout [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 January 2006 23:50
To: support@pfsense.com
Subject: Re: Re: [pfSense Support] IPSec enhancements ??s
Cas
14 matches
Mail list logo
