Re: My 2.1 Upgrade

2011-07-02 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/2/11 4:43 PM, JohnW-Mpls wrote [in part]: > > 2.1 is no better than 2.0.14 at spoofing my local grocery store's website - > still need to use IE or FFox. Some sites -- including my bank's site -- cannot be fooled by a spoof that contains both "Firefox" and "SeaMonkey". I use PrefBar to spoo

SeaMonkey 2.0.14 to 2.1

2011-07-02 Thread Johnzy
Hello, Everybody, I was on SeaMonkey today [7/2/1] after a month or a month and half due of my hectic work schedule since I feel like working two jobs [grin] so, anyway, I have the freetime to check on SeaMonkey. I use 2.0.14 as my current version. I clicked "Help > Check for updates" but, no upda

My 2.1 Upgrade

2011-07-02 Thread JohnW-Mpls
Upgrading from 2.0.14 to 2.1 did not include all of my bookmarks - some groups were missing and most looked like a month ago. I now have the current list - I imported bookmark.html from last week's system backup and then deleted all the ones from the upgrade action. I like the search capability i

Re: Seamonkey home page

2011-07-02 Thread JD
fred bisard wrote: i'm getting this trying to access the seamonkey home page. This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it means that the Apache HTTP server installed at this site is working properly. If you a

Re: Seamonkey home page

2011-07-02 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/2/11 10:10 AM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 7/2/11 9:43 AM, fred bisard wrote: >> i'm getting this trying to access the seamonkey home page. >> >> This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP >> server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it >> means that t

Re: Seamonkey home page

2011-07-02 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
David E. Ross wrote: On 7/2/11 9:43 AM, fred bisard wrote: i'm getting this trying to access the seamonkey home page. This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it means that the Apache HTTP server installed

Re: Edit message as new -> The sent is rejected

2011-07-02 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
cyberzen wrote: in the other case, when sending a message having only BCCs do you mean that SM should copy the whole in sent folder, expanding all BCCs ? is not there a privacy issue ? No, I don't think the user needs to be protected from knowing to whom he sent mail. It's a separate issue

Re: Edit message as new -> The sent is rejected

2011-07-02 Thread Ray_Net
cyberzen wrote: Ray_Net a écrit : cyberzen wrote: for example I have seen something curious : To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net> it's some of my friends who sent a joke to a bunch of BCC other ones.. I do not know the real reason of it IT's A REAL BUG of SM, be

Re: Seamonkey home page

2011-07-02 Thread NoOp
On 07/02/2011 10:10 AM, David E. Ross wrote: > On 7/2/11 9:43 AM, fred bisard wrote: >> i'm getting this trying to access the seamonkey home page. >> >> This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP >> server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it >> means t

Scrolling Tabs..

2011-07-02 Thread JD
I never noticed this before, but my SM2.1 has scrolling tabs. When I put my mouse pointer on the tabs and use the scroll wheel, I can scroll through the tabs. I'm using a Logitech LX3 optical mouse. -- JD.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support

Re: Seamonkey home page

2011-07-02 Thread David E. Ross
On 7/2/11 9:43 AM, fred bisard wrote: > i'm getting this trying to access the seamonkey home page. > > This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP > server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it > means that the Apache HTTP server installed at this site is

Seamonkey home page

2011-07-02 Thread fred bisard
i'm getting this trying to access the seamonkey home page. This page is used to test the proper operation of the Apache HTTP server after it has been installed. If you can read this page, it means that the Apache HTTP server installed at this site is working properly. If you are a member of the ge

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-07-02 Thread Philip Chee
On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 06:46:25 -0400, No wrote: > JD - A few of the add-on's which do not work for me, that I want to use > include: password exporter, folderpane tools, password maker and, user > agent switcher. > > Your assistance would be great in getting these working. I just deleted > view

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-07-02 Thread JD
No wrote: JD wrote: William Greenwood wrote: JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines be

Save message feature in mail compose

2011-07-02 Thread Reed Snider
With version 2.014 when I needed to close a no longer needed composing message window in 2.014 Mac OS. I would Cmd=w and then hit my keyboard 'd' key and the message would not be saved as draft etc just close now I can no longer use just the 'd' key for not saving why do I now

Re: WHY ?

2011-07-02 Thread Rick Merrill
Ray_Net wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: Ray_Net wrote: Rick Merrill wrote: .. SM can take a dozen seconds to close, even after the GUI disappears from your screen as it cleans cookies and cache. Sorry to dissapoint you, but the first program i stop is SM ... so he have plenty of time to clean a

Re: SM 2.1 not a real enhancement

2011-07-02 Thread No
JD wrote: William Greenwood wrote: JD wrote: Ray_Net wrote: I have just passed from 2.0.10 to 2.1.0 and my first impression is not good ... (i had not the time to look at all other details, but for the browser, i am not very happy. Here is my 2 problems: I have seen extra lines before my rea

Re: Edit message as new -> The sent is rejected

2011-07-02 Thread cyberzen
Ray_Net a écrit : cyberzen wrote: for example I have seen something curious : To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net> it's some of my friends who sent a joke to a bunch of BCC other ones.. I do not know the real reason of it IT's A REAL BUG of SM, because he add the

Re: Edit message as new -> The sent is rejected

2011-07-02 Thread Ray_Net
cyberzen wrote: Paul B. Gallagher a écrit : cyberzen wrote: so when I edit a sent message as new I don't find malformed headers as you seem to have have typed Ctrl U to view the whole source ? for example I have seen something curious : To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.

Re: Edit message as new -> The sent is rejected

2011-07-02 Thread cyberzen
cyberzen a écrit : I resent the message with the To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net> this was done silently, but I don't know to who.. I think my provider is remembering the bcc list... ? I hope so in fact not, I have got error messages it's all normal.. -- cyberzen

Re: Edit message as new -> The sent is rejected

2011-07-02 Thread cyberzen
Paul B. Gallagher a écrit : cyberzen wrote: so when I edit a sent message as new I don't find malformed headers as you seem to have have typed Ctrl U to view the whole source ? for example I have seen something curious : To: <"Undisclosed-Recipient:;"@spooler8-g27.priv.proxad.net> it's some o