Re: Why does SeaMonkey delete browsing history?

Interviewed by CNN on 27/08/2011 22:55, Tony Bonano told the world: > Why does SeaMonkey 2.3.1 chose to empty my browsing history every hour > or so? > Earlier versions of SeaMonkey 2 didn't do this. > > What is the point of SeaMonkey having a browser history if it doesn't > store anything in the

Re: How can I block websites?

NoOp wrote : > On 08/26/2011 11:01 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > ... >> Anyway, this is all off-topic, so I'll stop there. >> > > Yes it is & please do. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.o

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

On 8/26/2011 10:32 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 06:46 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: On 8/26/2011 8:49 PM, NoOp wrote: On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but ther

Re: Why does SeaMonkey delete browsing history?

On Aug 27, 11:27 pm, nr wrote: > Interesting.  The only history option my SM has is to clear it when I exit. > > How have you told SM to keep your history for 10 days?  (I'd like to keep > mine for 3 days.) Sorry, the 10 days setting is for "Form and Search History". I assume your setting is fo

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: Are we seeing here an unheralded policy shift? Not at all. Those "chemspill" updates between regular six-week releases and a bump in the third part of the version number are a regular part of the rapid release plan. Firefox did something similar (for a different p

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

NoOp schrieb: "we can still send future updates even once the current certificate of our update server expires" Apparently I formulated it in a way that was easy for you to misunderstand, so let me reformulate it: "we can still send future updates *with a new certificate* even once the curr

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

Philipp van Hüllen schrieb: It's just about having 3 (instead of 1) "root"(!) certificate being allowed to sign valid certificates for servers (I assume) holding the information about updates. Right. Esp. as the one allowed root we had previously is not being used for issuing new certificates

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

On 08/27/2011 12:00 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 8/27/2011 12:44 PM, Philip Chee wrote: >> On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:36:34 -0500, David E. Ross wrote: >> >>> Does this mean SeaMonkey 2.3.1 contains a new version of NSS with the >>> new root certificate? >> >> No it doesn't. >> > > To elaborat

Re: Why does SeaMonkey delete browsing history?

On 8/27/11 2:55 PM, Tony Bonano wrote: > In the past week SeaMonkey 2.3.1 has started fully deleting my browser > history every few hours -- it is uncear why. Is this a new bug? > > My SeaMonkey settings are set to keep browser history for ten days. > > How can this be fixed? The capability to d

Re: Why does SeaMonkey delete browsing history?

Interesting. The only history option my SM has is to clear it when I exit. How have you told SM to keep your history for 10 days? (I'd like to keep mine for 3 days.) ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.

Why does SeaMonkey delete browsing history?

In the past week SeaMonkey 2.3.1 has started fully deleting my browser history every few hours -- it is uncear why. Is this a new bug? My SeaMonkey settings are set to keep browser history for ten days. How can this be fixed? ___ support-seamonkey maili

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

On 8/27/2011 12:44 PM, Philip Chee wrote: On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:36:34 -0500, David E. Ross wrote: Does this mean SeaMonkey 2.3.1 contains a new version of NSS with the new root certificate? No it doesn't. To elaborate, it only adds the acceptance of another root for UPDATES. Before we on

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

On Sat, 27 Aug 2011 10:36:34 -0500, David E. Ross wrote: > Does this mean SeaMonkey 2.3.1 contains a new version of NSS with the > new root certificate? No it doesn't. > If so, please update the Wiki at > . Phil -- Philip Chee , http://flashbloc

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

On 8/26/11 6:46 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote: > On 8/26/2011 8:49 PM, NoOp wrote: >> On 08/26/2011 01:33 PM, Robert Kaiser wrote: >>> David E. Ross schrieb: Is there an official, end-user release of SeaMonkey 2.3.1? I've seen some discussion about it, but there has been no announcement

Re: Cookie management

On 8/26/11 7:21 PM, Jesse Molina wrote: > > Looks like you can still use the old cookie manager; > > chrome://communicator/content/permissions/cookieViewer.xul > > It would be nice if there was something more powerful though. I just > want a list of all my domains with permitted cookies, the b

Re: Seamonkey 2.31 is refusing to put a log email in the sent box on W7

rodlov...@ozemail.com.au wrote: Hi, Seamonkey is refusing to put anything in sent box after emailing, I wonder what to do to keep a sent log email This happens on Windows 7 seamonkey 2.31, any help much appreciated. Previously it worked fine but all configs I tried no go. Cheers Could it be po

Re: How can I block websites?

Jane--Galt wrote: I'm neither left wing or right wing, and yes, Media Matters is definitely a communist site IMO. Next you'll be telling us that Barack Obama, the most conservative Democratic president of my lifetime (forget his words, look at his actions), is a socialist bent on enslaving

Re: Help Seamonkey 2.31 is refusing to put anything in sent box in W7

Rod Lovett a écrit : Hi folks Seamonkey 2.31 is refusing to put anything in sent box after emailing, I wonder what to do to keep a sent email in the sent box. This is happening on Windows 7 running seamonkey 2.31, any help much appreciated. Previously it worked fine but all configs I tried no luc

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

NoOp wrote: Actually it's the 'Changes' page that points to the bug report *not* the release notes: The Changes page is part of the Release Notes. No need to nit-pick. Greetings, Jens -- Jens Hatlak SeaMonkey Trunk Tracker

Help Seamonkey 2.31 is refusing to put anything in sent box in W7

Hi folks Seamonkey 2.31 is refusing to put anything in sent box after emailing, I wonder what to do to keep a sent email in the sent box. This is happening on Windows 7 running seamonkey 2.31, any help much appreciated. Previously it worked fine but all configs I tried no luck with this proble

Re: How can I block websites?

Jane--Galt wrote: > The socialist has hi say, then you tell ME to take it elsewhere? Yes. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

NoOp schrieb: Per the Thawte instructions, I use on IE on Windows to manage my certs. Does this means that anyone running on a Mac or on Linux is left out in the cold? There is no impact on using SM, except for the process when SM checks itself for updates. Right... Does mozilla.org not hav

Re: SeaMonkey 2.3.1?

Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: Hey,hey! How does the existence and release of SM 2.3.1 square with the firm promise/policy not to issue any third level: patches, fixes, updates? Shouldn't this fix have been held for a future 2.x release? How does this play into the code changes being tested as 2.4?