Re: Sig delimiters

2012-03-14 Thread Daniel
Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Daniel wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. Would you mind removing the second -- sig delimiter in your sig, please? Some newsreaders, like my Pan, see the second and ignore the

No sound at youTube!

2012-03-14 Thread Daniel
Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 In the last week or so, when I have clicked on a Usenet link to view a video (any video) at youTube, I get the video but no sound. Don't know when this started, as I'm just catching up on my

Re: Sig delimiters

2012-03-14 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Daniel wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Daniel wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: -- War doesn't determine who's right, just who's left. Would you mind removing the second -- sig delimiter in your sig, please? Some newsreaders, like my Pan, see the

Re: No sound at youTube!

2012-03-14 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 14/03/2012 05:53, Daniel told the world: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 In the last week or so, when I have clicked on a Usenet link to view a video (any video) at youTube, I get the video but no

Re: Ancient Message?

2012-03-14 Thread Jay Garcia
On 14.03.2012 09:22, Larry S. wrote: --- Original Message --- SM 2.7.2 From time to time I would find, among other message headers on this group. a listing for one with no subject but a date of 12/31/69 at 7:00 p.m., marked read. Recently I began to get two of these, and now today I got

Re: Is Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.8 late in its release?

2012-03-14 Thread Robert Kaiser
Ant schrieb: Uh, it is almost a day later and http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ still shows v2.7.2. :( Not any more. And no, it has been released way less than a day after Firefox 11 - but Firefox 11 went out late in the day yesterday as well. Not sure by what account you said almost a day

Re: Ancient Message?

2012-03-14 Thread Beauregard T. Shagnasty
Larry S. wrote: SM 2.7.2 From time to time I would find, among other message headers on this group. a listing for one with no subject but a date of 12/31/69 at 7:00 p.m., marked read. Recently I began to get two of these, and now today I got three of them, including one marked unread. When

Re: No sound at youTube!

2012-03-14 Thread Chris Ilias
On 12-03-14 4:53 AM, _Daniel_ spoke thusly: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 In the last week or so, when I have clicked on a Usenet link to view a video (any video) at youTube, I get the video but no sound. Don't know when this

Re: No sound at youTube!

2012-03-14 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-03-14 4:53 AM, _Daniel_ spoke thusly: Build identifier: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 SeaMonkey/2.7.2 In the last week or so, when I have clicked on a Usenet link to view a video (any video) at youTube, I get the video but no sound.

Re: Ancient Message?

2012-03-14 Thread NoOp
On 03/14/2012 07:22 AM, Larry S. wrote: SM 2.7.2 From time to time I would find, among other message headers on this group. a listing for one with no subject but a date of 12/31/69 at 7:00 p.m., marked read. Recently I began to get two of these, and now today I got three of them,

Moving SeaMonkey Data and/or Profile Files to a Different Drive

2012-03-14 Thread Frog
I just finished going through a very traumatic event...having to replace my C Drive information with data from a September 11, 2011 backup. My biggest loss during this change was my SeaMonkey messages...bookmarks...addresses...and I'm sure more that I haven't noticed at this time.

Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
The subject: header says it all. :) Perhaps a bug fix-up release. Hopefully not a chem spill release. -- Rostyk ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread Chris Ilias
On 12-03-14 6:29 PM, _Rostyslaw Lewyckyj_ spoke thusly: The subject: header says it all. :) Perhaps a bug fix-up release. Hopefully not a chem spill release. As far as I know, there are no plans for a 2.8.1 release. Why are you expecting one? -- Chris Ilias http://ilias.ca Newsgroup

Re: Ancient Message?

2012-03-14 Thread JAS
NoOp wrote: On 03/14/2012 07:22 AM, Larry S. wrote: SM 2.7.2 From time to time I would find, among other message headers on this group. a listing for one with no subject but a date of 12/31/69 at 7:00 p.m., marked read. Recently I began to get two of these, and now today I got three of

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread Robert Kaiser
Rostyslaw Lewyckyj schrieb: The subject: header says it all. :) Hopefully never. But chemspills/oilspills always come unexpectedly. Robert Kaiser ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread Rufus
Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-03-14 6:29 PM, _Rostyslaw Lewyckyj_ spoke thusly: The subject: header says it all. :) Perhaps a bug fix-up release. Hopefully not a chem spill release. As far as I know, there are no plans for a 2.8.1 release. Why are you expecting one? Just submitted an interface

Thanks for SeaMonkey 2.8

2012-03-14 Thread Paul Bergsagel
Thanks to all the developers for the new SeaMonkey 2.8 release. Runs very well on my iMac with OS X 10.6.8 ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Re: Thanks for SeaMonkey 2.8

2012-03-14 Thread Rufus
Paul Bergsagel wrote: Thanks to all the developers for the new SeaMonkey 2.8 release. Runs very well on my iMac with OS X 10.6.8 Have you encountered this happening? I have - SM 2.8 Mac is not returning to Open when Minimized to the Dock and a new link or file is opened. I was asked to

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-03-14 6:29 PM, _Rostyslaw Lewyckyj_ spoke thusly: The subject: header says it all. :) Perhaps a bug fix-up release. Hopefully not a chem spill release. As far as I know, there are no plans for a 2.8.1 release. Why are you expecting one? But definitely! As the ship

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread Chris Ilias
On 12-03-14 9:27 PM, _Rostyslaw Lewyckyj_ spoke thusly: Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-03-14 6:29 PM, _Rostyslaw Lewyckyj_ spoke thusly: The subject: header says it all. :) Perhaps a bug fix-up release. Hopefully not a chem spill release. As far as I know, there are no plans for a 2.8.1 release.

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 14/03/2012 19:29, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj told the world: The subject: header says it all. :) Perhaps a bug fix-up release. Hopefully not a chem spill release. Under the release train system, the only reason for a 2.8.1 release would be an oilspill/chemspill -- that is, a

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread Rostyslaw Lewyckyj
MCBastos wrote: Interviewed by CNN on 14/03/2012 19:29, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj told the world: The subject: header says it all. :) Perhaps a bug fix-up release. Hopefully not a chem spill release. Under the release train system, the only reason for a 2.8.1 release would be an oilspill/chemspill

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread MCBastos
Interviewed by CNN on 15/03/2012 00:40, Rostyslaw Lewyckyj told the world: Fine. Well how do you classify bug #735946 just reported by Rufus? I don't. It's not my job, I don't have a Mac to test it, I have no *informed* opinion about it. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the

Re: Ok. So when can we expect 2.8.1

2012-03-14 Thread GerardJan
Chris Ilias wrote: On 12-03-14 6:29 PM, _Rostyslaw Lewyckyj_ spoke thusly: The subject: header says it all. :) Perhaps a bug fix-up release. Hopefully not a chem spill release. As far as I know, there are no plans for a 2.8.1 release. Why are you expecting one? i am running /Gnome+bluetile/

Re: Thanks for SeaMonkey 2.8

2012-03-14 Thread GerardJan
Paul Bergsagel wrote: Thanks to all the developers for the new SeaMonkey 2.8 release. Runs very well on my iMac with OS X 10.6.8 and on my /Fedora16/ -- Gertjan DYSLEXICS OF THE WORLD, UNTIE! ___ support-seamonkey mailing list

Re: Is Mozilla's SeaMonkey v2.8 late in its release?

2012-03-14 Thread Ant
On 3/14/2012 7:37 AM PT, Robert Kaiser typed: Uh, it is almost a day later and http://www.seamonkey-project.org/ still shows v2.7.2. :( Not any more. And no, it has been released way less than a day after Firefox 11 - but Firefox 11 went out late in the day yesterday as well. Finally, it's