Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-08 Thread GerardJan
NoOp wrote: On 05/08/2012 07:17 PM, GerardJan wrote: GerardJan wrote: NoOp wrote: Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java 1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on the same systems with: ... Anyone else experiencing the same/sim

Re: Emails

2012-05-08 Thread GerardJan
Daniel wrote: Test wrote: Test wrote, On 5/8/2012 4:42 PM: Upgraded from 2.6 to 2.91 and now a number of emails appear blank. There is a header but nothing in the email. Have tried rebooting and also set up on a separate computer but same problem.. A restore point and reinstall 2.33 and I see

Re: Emails

2012-05-08 Thread Daniel
Test wrote: Test wrote, On 5/8/2012 4:42 PM: Upgraded from 2.6 to 2.91 and now a number of emails appear blank. There is a header but nothing in the email. Have tried rebooting and also set up on a separate computer but same problem.. A restore point and reinstall 2.33 and I seem most of my em

Re: Verify Java Version

2012-05-08 Thread GerardJan
GerardJan wrote: http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp?jre_version=1.7.0_04&vendor=Oracle+Corporation&os=Windows+7&os_version=6.1 Ich habe es nie gewusst... hahaha -- ~Vink ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla.o

Verify Java Version

2012-05-08 Thread GerardJan
http://java.com/en/download/installed.jsp?jre_version=1.7.0_04&vendor=Oracle+Corporation&os=Windows+7&os_version=6.1 -- Cl Rumania 26 03503 Benidorm (ALC) Spain http://ciudadpatricia.com ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozi

Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-08 Thread NoOp
On 05/08/2012 07:17 PM, GerardJan wrote: > GerardJan wrote: >> NoOp wrote: >>> Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java >>> 1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on >>> the same systems with: ... >>> >>> Anyone else experiencing the sam

Re: Lost Mail

2012-05-08 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Larry wrote: Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had before the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right there in my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no

Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-08 Thread GerardJan
GerardJan wrote: NoOp wrote: Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java 1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on the same systems with: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; r

Re: [linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-08 Thread GerardJan
NoOp wrote: Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java 1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on the same systems with: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0

Lost Mail

2012-05-08 Thread Larry
Just upgraded from 2.8 to 2.9.1. I'm using the same profile I had before the change, and all seems well except that I was forced to set up new mail and news accounts, even though the mail folders are right there in my profile but apparently aren't recognized. Consequently, I have no mail histor

[linux] Java 7u4 not working in SM 2.9.1

2012-05-08 Thread NoOp
Today I updated two linux systems from Java (Oracle) 6 update 32 to Java 1.7.0.04 ((build 1.7.0_04-b20)) today. Java 1.7.0.04 is working fine on the same systems with: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:12.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/12.0 Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:15.0) Gecko/15.0 Firefox/15.0a

Re: Emails

2012-05-08 Thread Test
Test wrote, On 5/8/2012 4:42 PM: Upgraded from 2.6 to 2.91 and now a number of emails appear blank. There is a header but nothing in the email. Have tried rebooting and also set up on a separate computer but same problem.. A restore point and reinstall 2.33 and I seem most of my email has reap

Emails

2012-05-08 Thread Test
Upgraded from 2.6 to 2.91 and now a number of emails appear blank. There is a header but nothing in the email. Have tried rebooting and also set up on a separate computer but same problem.. ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mo

Re: "Copy completed" pop-up stay visible

2012-05-08 Thread Ray_Net
Ray_Net wrote, On 07/05/2012 22:54: The "Copy Completed" pop-up windows did not end - We are obliged to click on "cancel" or obliged to close the window. I suppose that this issue was already filled in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ but i cannot find it with the "copy completed" string to search

strange fault message under 2.12a1

2012-05-08 Thread GerardJan
(seamonkey:2103): Gtk-WARNING **: Unable to retrieve the file info for `file:///home/gerardjan/Downloads/xcacls_setup.exe': Error stating file '/home/gerardjan/Downloads/xcacls_setup.exe': No such file or directory but it downloaded quite well and xcacls_setup.exe in in my Download directory

Windows Versions (was;- Re: Why the full 21.7MB??)

2012-05-08 Thread Daniel
Jim Taylor wrote: Snip Daniel wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Daniel wrote: Jim, my download limit is greatly increased, now-a-days, but cannot see the logic in downloading a big file, just because I can. And why would the busy SeaMonkey Council volunteers produce an update file if they didn't wan

Re: Why the full 21.7MB??

2012-05-08 Thread Jim Taylor
Snip Daniel wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Daniel wrote: Jim, my download limit is greatly increased, now-a-days, but cannot see the logic in downloading a big file, just because I can. And why would the busy SeaMonkey Council volunteers produce an update file if they didn't want people to use the

Re: Why the full 21.7MB??

2012-05-08 Thread Daniel
Daniel wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Daniel wrote: I don't know if you are the only one that sees a problem with it, but you may well be. I certainly don't see a problem with it. Even on a system that is eligible for a partial upgrade I think that if there is a problem with the upgrade server it

Re: Why the full 21.7MB??

2012-05-08 Thread Daniel
Jim Taylor wrote: Daniel wrote: Jim Taylor wrote: Daniel wrote: Manuel Reimer wrote: Daniel wrote: With 2.9.1 being out for a week or so, I figured it was safe to now do the update from 2.8 to 2.9.1and now I find I'm in the process of a 21MB download!!! Of course. AFAIK partial upd