Re: How do I get SM to stop marking e-mails as 'SPAM'

HenriK wrote: Geoff Welsh wrote: HenriK wrote: Daniel wrote: HenriK wrote: SM has suddenly started marking selected incoming e-mails as 'SPAM'. I don't know if that is SM's doing or whether it is being done by an 'add-on' that has been activated inadvertently. Can anyone give me some hints o

Re: How do I get SM to stop marking e-mails as 'SPAM'

Interviewed by CNN on 20/08/2013 16:36, HenriK told the world: > Good thought and thanks for the reply. The problem is in the 'subject > line and what is being added is [!! SPAM] in front of the regular > subject name. > > The problem also does not happen with a back-up computer accessing the

Re: How do I get SM to stop marking e-mails as 'SPAM'

Geoff Welsh wrote: HenriK wrote: Daniel wrote: HenriK wrote: SM has suddenly started marking selected incoming e-mails as 'SPAM'. I don't know if that is SM's doing or whether it is being done by an 'add-on' that has been activated inadvertently. Can anyone give me some hints on where to look

Re: Bookmarks - not optimally filed

In , Philip Taylor wrote: > Richard Owlett wrote: > > > Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not > > mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be > > working on a project with mu

Re: Anyone affected by Bug 903451?

On 8/19/13 1:37 AM +0900, Rob wrote: A Williams wrote: Ruediger Lahl wrote: *Rob* schrieb: I created this bug for Seamonkey 2.20: Program is starting much, much slower. I read from a guy in german usenet, who could fix a suchlike problem by making a new exception in his firewall for 2.20

Re: How do I get SM to stop marking e-mails as 'SPAM'

HenriK wrote: Daniel wrote: HenriK wrote: SM has suddenly started marking selected incoming e-mails as 'SPAM'. I don't know if that is SM's doing or whether it is being done by an 'add-on' that has been activated inadvertently. Can anyone give me some hints on where to look to get this feature

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

hawker wrote: On 8/20/2013 10:13 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: hawker wrote: On 8/20/2013 8:47 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on a project with multiple open sites

Re: How do I get SM to stop marking e-mails as 'SPAM'

Daniel wrote: HenriK wrote: SM has suddenly started marking selected incoming e-mails as 'SPAM'. I don't know if that is SM's doing or whether it is being done by an 'add-on' that has been activated inadvertently. Can anyone give me some hints on where to look to get this feature turned off?

Re: How do I get SM to stop marking e-mails as 'SPAM'

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: HenriK wrote: SM has suddenly started marking selected incoming e-mails as 'SPAM'. I don't know if that is SM's doing or whether it is being done by an 'add-on' that has been activated inadvertently. Can anyone give me some hints on where to look to get this feature t

Re: Bookmarks - not optimally filed

On 8/20/2013 11:54 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: Philip Taylor wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on a project with multiple open sites and have to shut down for t

Re: Bookmarks - not optimally filed

Philip Taylor wrote: Richard Owlett wrote: Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on a project with multiple open sites and have to shut down for the day. I'll create a temporary folder to hold

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

hawker wrote: On 8/20/2013 10:13 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: hawker wrote: On 8/20/2013 8:47 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on a project with multiple open sites

Re: Bookmarks - not optimally filed

Richard Owlett wrote: > Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean > that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on > a project with multiple open sites and have to shut down for the day. > I'll create a temporary folder to hold bookmarks of cu

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

WaltS wrote: Hartmut Figge wrote: hawker: Anyway the bookmarks used to be stored in a nice HTML file so when I got lost I would open it and edit or search in it. Ah, i remember doing that and i am missing it. Hartmut So open Manage Bookmarks (Ctrl+B), select Tools > Export HTML..., to c

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

WaltS: >Hartmut Figge wrote: >> hawker: >>> Anyway the bookmarks used to be stored in a nice HTML file so when I got >>> lost I would open it and edit or search in it. >> >> Ah, i remember doing that and i am missing it. > >So open Manage Bookmarks (Ctrl+B), select Tools > Export HTML..., to >cre

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

Hartmut Figge wrote: hawker: Anyway the bookmarks used to be stored in a nice HTML file so when I got lost I would open it and edit or search in it. Ah, i remember doing that and i am missing it. Hartmut So open Manage Bookmarks (Ctrl+B), select Tools > Export HTML..., to create that HT

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

hawker: >Anyway the bookmarks used to be stored in a nice HTML file so when I got >lost I would open it and edit or search in it. Ah, i remember doing that and i am missing it. Hartmut ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.mozilla

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

On 8/20/2013 10:13 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: hawker wrote: On 8/20/2013 8:47 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on a project with multiple open sites and have to shu

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

hawker wrote: On 8/20/2013 8:47 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on a project with multiple open sites and have to shut down for the day. I'll create a temporary fo

Re: Boookmarks - not optimally filed

On 8/20/2013 8:47 AM, Richard Owlett wrote: Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on a project with multiple open sites and have to shut down for the day. I'll create a temporary folder to hold bo

Boookmarks - not optimally filed

Just because I place a bookmark in one sub-folder today does not mean that will be where I'll look for it next week. Also I may be working on a project with multiple open sites and have to shut down for the day. I'll create a temporary folder to hold bookmarks of currently open pages *ASSUMING*

Re: v2.20 is out!

On 08/20/2013 03:01 AM, Achim Woellgens wrote: Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2013 07:16:41 UTC+2 schrieb Ant: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.20/ ;) However, I did not see an internal updates in Windows (64-bit 7 EE SP1 and XP Pro. SP3) so far. :( -- "Don't be no Ant-Man. An

Re: How do I get SM to stop marking e-mails as 'SPAM'

HenriK wrote: SM has suddenly started marking selected incoming e-mails as 'SPAM'. I don't know if that is SM's doing or whether it is being done by an 'add-on' that has been activated inadvertently. Can anyone give me some hints on where to look to get this feature turned off? Thanks, in adva

Re: Can't get mail again

Albert M. Simon wrote: Once again apparent auto updated to 2.20 and again cannot access mail. Whazzap? Why is this happening? Albert, have you turned the computer on?? ;-) What is happening when you try to get your mail?? Can you browse?? From the information you've supplied, it is difficult

Re: v2.20 is out!

Am Mittwoch, 7. August 2013 07:16:41 UTC+2 schrieb Ant: > http://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/seamonkey2.20/ ;) > > > > However, I did not see an internal updates in Windows (64-bit 7 EE SP1 > > and XP Pro. SP3) so far. :( > > -- > > "Don't be no Ant-Man. An Ant-Man has very low horiz