Re: new topic : Does you (( new SeaMonkey fans )) use Composer, Lightning calendar, ?????

2015-02-01 Thread Richard Falken
Alex Beauroy wrote: new topic : Does you (( new SeaMonkey fans )) use Composer, Lightning calendar, ? IRC ChatZilla ??? @lex I use the borwser, the email/usenet system, the addressbook and sometimes the HTML editor. I'use the IRC system if I hadn't a client running 24/7 on a remote

Re: new topic : Does you (( new SeaMonkey fans )) use Composer, Lightning calendar, ?????

2015-02-01 Thread Daniel
On 31/01/15 23:54, Alex Beauroy wrote: new topic : Does you (( new SeaMonkey fans )) use Composer, Lightning calendar, ? IRC ChatZilla ??? @lex Two out of three!! I don't have Lightning installed, but I believe it may soon be incorporated with-in the Suite. I have two chns up on

Re: new topic : Does you (( new SeaMonkey fans )) use Composer, Lightning calendar, ?????

2015-02-01 Thread Bill Spikowski
Alex Beauroy wrote: new topic : Does you (( new SeaMonkey fans )) use Composer, Lightning calendar, ? IRC ChatZilla ??? @lex I use Lightning -- many of my colleagues use Outlook for everything, and assume others do too. Without Lightning, when they invite me to a meeting, I get a

Re: allowing flash player

2015-02-01 Thread David H. Durgee
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David H. Durgee wrote: I'm seeing something a bit strange here. Looking at about:plugins in SeaMonkey I see: Shockwave Flash File: libflashplayer.so Path: /usr/lib/adobe-flashplugin/libflashplayer.so

Re: Buttons in websites not displaying properly.

2015-02-01 Thread NoOp
On 01/30/2015 08:19 AM, Ed Mullen wrote: Jonathan N. Little wrote on 1/30/2015 8:43 AM: Daniel wrote: G Tod wrote: Excuse me? Sorry, I don't get this! What David is trying to suggested is that, if the programmer does a poor job (176 errors total), the User will probably get poor results!

Re: Dial-up internet

2015-02-01 Thread Lee
On 2/1/15, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) . wrote: On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:33:24 -0500, Lee ler...@gmail.com wrote: On 1/30/15, WaltS48 thalion...@evomeraim.com wrote: On 01/30/2015 05:39 PM, Richard Owlett wrote: Thee Chicago Wolf [MVP] wrote: [snip] Yes, we know there's still a population out

Re: allowing flash player

2015-02-01 Thread David H. Durgee
David H. Durgee wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: David H. Durgee wrote: I'm seeing something a bit strange here. Looking at about:plugins in SeaMonkey I see: Shockwave Flash File: libflashplayer.so Path:

Re: allowing flash player

2015-02-01 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
David H. Durgee wrote: I decided to try something, I shut down SeaMonkey and edited the pluginreg.dat file in the SeaMonkey profile to match the FireFox one regarding flash. Now it reports the proper version number, so that appears to be the source of my problem. Now the question is why

Upgrading from 2.26.1

2015-02-01 Thread Zeb Carter
I haven't upgraded yet due to concerns regarding some problems with 2.29/2.30. The primary reason why I haven't upgraded was the breakage of viewing images in binary newsgroups in the later versions. I haven't seen any indication that this has been fixed n 2.32. Can anyone confirm this is

Re: Can't send this page with anchors?

2015-02-01 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
Ant wrote: Example with http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/49/commercials#video=0ap300466623 Send this page resulted http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/49/commercials only. A bug? By design (annoying)? Thank you in advance. :) WFM. Exactly what did you do, and exactly where did the truncated URL

Re: Can't send this page with anchors?

2015-02-01 Thread Ant
On 2/1/2015 9:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Example with http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/49/commercials#video=0ap300466623 Send this page resulted http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/49/commercials only. A bug? By design (annoying)? Thank you in advance. :) WFM. Exactly what did you do, and

Re: Can't send this page with anchors?

2015-02-01 Thread Ant
On 2/1/2015 9:34 PM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Example with http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/49/commercials#video=0ap300466623 Send this page resulted http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/49/commercials only. A bug? By design (annoying)? Thank you in advance. :) WFM. Exactly what did you do, and

Can't send this page with anchors?

2015-02-01 Thread Ant
Example with http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/49/commercials#video=0ap300466623 Send this page resulted http://www.nfl.com/superbowl/49/commercials only. A bug? By design (annoying)? Thank you in advance. :) -- He who cannot pick up an ant, and wants to pick up an elephant will some day see