Re: Same Old Question

DoctorBill wrote: I am sorry to ask this same old question again, but I can't remember how to do it - give me a break ! I am running SM 2.12.11 and many sites now won't work. I get a message that my Browser is too old to work with their sitedamn ! I have the newer version of SM downloaded,

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: you can put that definition in the style sheet and just code Just one minor correction to your otherwise excellent post. The above would be: ... Whoops, absolutely right. I should've replaced "font" with "span," thus:

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

Paul B. Gallagher wrote: > you can put that definition in the style sheet and just code style="whatever"> Just one minor correction to your otherwise excellent post. The above would be: ... Class, instead of style, and apply it to the HTML elements instead of any tags, which are comp

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

stango wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> That's irrelevant to this discussion so far. Bluefish isn't related to >> Composer or BlueGriffon at all. It is an entirely different kind of >> tool. (I know; I use Bluefish.) >> > If you looked at my web site first glance you would not be able to

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

stango wrote: If you looked at my web site first glance you would not be able to tell what I used to create it and most people will not care. Because I know how to write code I decided that I do not need CSS to create it. Feasible, yes. Efficient, not always. The original genius of HTML was t

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: stango wrote: stango wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: stango wrote: You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using Blue Griffon. Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'! Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, b

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

On 07/03/2015 02:32 PM, warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote: I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is available as a stand alone piece of software, or if SeaMonkey itself is required. I am jumping to Windows 7 from a Windows XP machine (which amazingly enough, still has cla

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

stango wrote: > stango wrote: >> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >>> stango wrote: You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using Blue Griffon. Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'! >>> >>> Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, but

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

stango wrote: Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: stango wrote: You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using Blue Griffon. Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'! Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, but authors wishing to use new technologies such

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: stango wrote: You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using Blue Griffon. Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'! Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, but authors wishing to use new technologies such as html5 and C

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

stango wrote: > You are better off using the 'outdated' Composer than you are using Blue > Griffon. > > Composer is truly WYSIWYG while Blue Griffon is a 'hack'! Perhaps Composer is okay for your web site, but authors wishing to use new technologies such as html5 and CSS will be better served w

Re: Same Old Question

DoctorBill wrote: I am sorry to ask this same old question again, but I can't remember how to do it - give me a break ! I am running SM 2.12.11 and many sites now won't work. I get a message that my Browser is too old to work with their sitedamn ! I have the newer version of SM downloaded,

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: warwolfprime wrote: I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is available as a stand alone piece of software, The Composer is seriously out-of-date, and hasn't been touched in well over a decade. No, it's not available separately. You wou

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

warwolfprime wrote: > I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is > available as a stand alone piece of software, The Composer is seriously out-of-date, and hasn't been touched in well over a decade. No, it's not available separately. You would do better to get and insta

Re: New Seamonkey User

you can save your bookmarks (as html), then IMPORT them into FF I also modified "password exporter" available as an add-on (with the help from someone here) and save/import them to FF this way you have 2 sets of bookmarks, passwords... just in case lanie molinar wrote on 6/28/2015 9:58 PM:

Re: Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

On 7/3/15, warwolfpr...@gmail.com wrote: > I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is > available as a stand alone piece of software, nope > or if SeaMonkey itself is required. yup > I am jumping to Windows 7 from a Windows XP machine (which > amazingly enough, still h

Is it possible to get Composer only, or do you need to use SeaMonkey to use it?

I am curious as to whether or not the Composer part of SeaMonkey is available as a stand alone piece of software, or if SeaMonkey itself is required. I am jumping to Windows 7 from a Windows XP machine (which amazingly enough, still has classic Netscape Composer), and I nominally use firefox as

Re: SeaMonkey Win32 nightlies - Worng URL

On 03/07/2015 18:52, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: > Mason83 schrieb: >> There are some nightly builds here: >> http://www.seamonkey-project.org/dev/nightly > > Hi, > > no, there you only find Error 404. > > I currently (until the will come every day, again) try to annonce any > new Windows nightly >

Re: SeaMonkey Win32 nightlies - Worng URL

Mason83 schrieb: There are some nightly builds here: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/dev/nightly Hi, no, there you only find Error 404. I currently (until the will come every day, again) try to annonce any new Windows nightly Aurora:

Re: support-seamonkey Digest, Vol 114, Issue 52

support-seamonkey-requ...@lists.mozilla.org wrote: Rodney Sampson wrote: >What's the best way to rebuild the indexes ? Right-click on mail folder "Properties > Repair Folder" Is there a way to move the repair function out to the right click menu ? How about a function where I could run from co

Re: Seamonkey CPU spin

Daniel wrote: On 3/07/2015 12:40 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Windows: %APPDATA%\Mozilla\SeaMonkey\Profiles\[SALT].default Linux: ~/mozilla/seamonkey/Profiles\[SALT].default ^^^ [1] You can sort out your profile location very easily, *without* reinstalling SeaMonkey. All you have to do

Re: Same Old Question

On 2/07/2015 11:41 PM, Mike C wrote: Daniel wrote: On 2/07/2015 2:55 PM, DoctorBill wrote: I am sorry to ask this same old question again, but I can't remember how to do it - give me a break ! I am running SM 2.12.11 and many sites now won't work. I get a message that my Browser is too old to

Re: Seamonkey CPU spin

On 3/07/2015 12:40 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Daniel wrote: On 2/07/2015 12:33 AM, Jonathan N. Little wrote: Okay, compaction only works on the Mail folders of course. My *Mail* folders are a total of 4.15 GB for 3 accounts, compacted. My whole profile folder (which contains the Mail fol

Re: SeaMonkey Win32 nightlies

On 03/07/2015 02:32, Thee Chicago Wolf (MVP) wrote: > Cool. Where are the contrib builds hanging out? Would like to test and > report back if there are any problems. There are some nightly builds here: http://www.seamonkey-project.org/dev/nightly ___ s