Re: Software Update check fails with xml error - Win 7

2016-03-03 Thread David Cox
On 4/03/2016 1:45 PM, Paul Bergsagel wrote: Rich Gray wrote: My work workstation went to check for updates about an hour ago and produced a error saying: Update Failed There were problems checking for, downloading or installing this update. SeaMonkey could not be updated because: Update XML f

Re: Why this right column of code?

2016-03-03 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
stan pierce wrote: Why do I sometimes get this kind of code (see right hand column of picture)? Thanks. Stan. http://www.fototime.com/9BD34BF2ABA83B3/standard.jpg"; border=0 alt="Hosting provided by FotoTime"> Looks to me like someone inadvertently deleted the opening "<" character, so the w

Why this right column of code?

2016-03-03 Thread stan pierce
Why do I sometimes get this kind of code (see right hand column of picture)? Thanks. Stan. http://www.fototime.com/9BD34BF2ABA83B3/standard.jpg"; border=0 alt="Hosting provided by FotoTime"> ___ support-seamonkey mailing list support-seamonkey@lists.

Re: Software Update check fails with xml error - Win 7

2016-03-03 Thread Paul Bergsagel
Rich Gray wrote: My work workstation went to check for updates about an hour ago and produced a error saying: Update Failed There were problems checking for, downloading or installing this update. SeaMonkey could not be updated because: Update XML file malformed(200) User agent: Mozilla/5.0

Software Update check fails with xml error - Win 7

2016-03-03 Thread Rich Gray
My work workstation went to check for updates about an hour ago and produced a error saying: Update Failed There were problems checking for, downloading or installing this update. SeaMonkey could not be updated because: Update XML file malformed(200) User agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
»Q« wrote: In , "Paul B. Gallagher" wrote: If your theory is correct, the following should all be flagged, since "ll" is not a word: The word list contains not only words but abbreviations; "ll" is in the word list because it's an abbrevia

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread »Q«
In , "Paul B. Gallagher" wrote: > If your theory is correct, the following should all be flagged, since > "ll" is not a word: The word list contains not only words but abbreviations; "ll" is in the word list because it's an abbreviation for "l

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This morning, I wrote: Spell-checked an outgoing message tonight that contained this sentence: For example, the common respectful greeting 오셨습니까 means literally, “You’ve come,” and a Korean may end

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: That may be because the parts taken separately are not flagged by the spell checker. "I", "he", "we" and "re" are words, and the single letters "m" and "d" are not flagged by the spell checker individually either (strangely, "i", "o" and "u" appear to

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote: Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This morning, I wrote: Spell-checked an outgoing message tonight that contained this sentence: For example, the common respectful greeting 오셨습니까 means literally, “You’ve come,” and a Korean may end a conversation by saying

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread mozilla-lists . mbourne
Paul B. Gallagher wrote: This morning, I wrote: Spell-checked an outgoing message tonight that contained this sentence: For example, the common respectful greeting 오셨습니까 means literally, “You’ve come,” and a Korean may end a conversation by saying “Then” (그럼). SM ignored the Korean bit and fl

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread Paul B. Gallagher
»Q« wrote: You might take it up with the ultimate upstream for the English (GB, US, and CA at least) dictionaries, . That page has links to their mailing list and their bug tracker. You might want to take a look at their bug tracker -- there are some entrie

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread »Q«
In , "Paul B. Gallagher" wrote: > This morning, I wrote: > > > Spell-checked an outgoing message tonight that contained this > > sentence: > > > > For example, the common respectful greeting 오셨습니까 > > means literally, “You’ve come,” and a Korean

Re: Spell checker doesn't understand curly apostrophes

2016-03-03 Thread Mason83
On 03/03/2016 02:50, David E. Ross wrote: > On 3/2/2016 10:22 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: >> David E. Ross wrote: >> >>> On 3/2/2016 12:40 AM, Paul B. Gallagher wrote: Spell-checked an outgoing message tonight that contained this sentence: For example, the common respectful greeting