NFN Smith wrote on 6/2/21 10:13 am:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
If you look at the "Lightning/Calendar in SM 2.53.6" thread you will
see someone - Daniel - who shares a profile between 2.49.1 and 2.53.6.
Not something I'd ever want to do, but it shows that it is
theoretically
(and practical
mozilla-lists.mbou...@spamgourmet.com wrote on 6/2/21 6:52 am:
Daniel wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 4/2/21 10:05 pm:
Daniel wrote:
Today I (finally) updated from SM 2.49.1 to SM 2.53.6 on Linux, as
shown in my sig file.
On my Win7 installation (updated from SM 2.49.5), after the up
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 5/2/21 11:43 pm:
Daniel wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 4/2/21 10:05 pm:
Daniel wrote:
Today I (finally) updated from SM 2.49.1 to SM 2.53.6 on Linux, as
shown in my sig file.
On my Win7 installation (updated from SM 2.49.5), after the update,
I had
David E. Ross wrote:
On 2/4/2021 10:52 AM, Rubens wrote:
Today I upgraded to 2.53.6.
But half of my dear extensions used for years stopped working.
Some of them have new WebEx-compatible updates though.
Does anybody know which future Seamonkey version is planned to support WebEx ?
Would i
NFN Smith wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
I find 2.53.x levels slower than 2.49.x levels, but - as you say -
compatible with more websites. My 2.53.5 has an unfortunate tendency
to lock up one of my processors if I visit certain websites. The only
way out is to quit the program, res
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
I find 2.53.x levels slower than 2.49.x levels, but - as you say -
compatible with more websites. My 2.53.5 has an unfortunate tendency to
lock up one of my processors if I visit certain websites. The only way
out is to quit the program, restart and then "Rest
David E. Ross wrote:
Would it be possible to get a list showing what Webextensions and newly
internal SeaMonkey features are available that are equivalent to the old
xul extensions? I am still with SeaMonkey 2.49.5 because I have some 28
extensions that I either really like or else truly depend
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
If you look at the "Lightning/Calendar in SM 2.53.6" thread you will see
someone - Daniel - who shares a profile between 2.49.1 and 2.53.6.
Not something I'd ever want to do, but it shows that it is theoretically
(and practically) possible. BUT NOT IF YOU HAVE A M
Samuel S wrote:
> Hello all - having issues with playing films on Netflix.
>
> Each time I try, there is a message which indicates that HTML5 Player
> and Silverlight are required.
>
> Silverlight is installed on my system so is it safe to presume that
> HTML5 is also installed?
>
> Maybe there
Rubens wrote:
NFN Smith wrote on 05/02/2021 17:44:
Does anybody know which future Seamonkey version is planned to
support WebEx ?
WebEx is planned for 2.57, but isn't imminent, and developer notes
indicate that there hasn't been any serious work started on
implementation.
I do have an a
NFN Smith wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Looking at https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#old_unofficial
I'd say things are not as bad as they look. The releases after 2.39
were: 2.40, 2.46, 2.48, 2.49.x and 2.53.x.
Lemuel Johnson points out that the current release notes sugge
NFN Smith wrote on 05-02-21 17:44:
Rubens wrote:
Today I upgraded to 2.53.6.
Did you back up your profile? If not, you may have difficulties
reverting, without data loss. I forget where it started happening
(perhaps 2.53.0), but as with Firefox, profiles are now no longer
backward compat
Daniel wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 4/2/21 10:05 pm:
Daniel wrote:
Today I (finally) updated from SM 2.49.1 to SM 2.53.6 on Linux, as
shown in my sig file.
On my Win7 installation (updated from SM 2.49.5), after the update, I
had Lightning starting at SM bootup, but not in Linux w
On 2/4/2021 10:52 AM, Rubens wrote:
>
> Today I upgraded to 2.53.6.
>
> But half of my dear extensions used for years stopped working.
>
> Some of them have new WebEx-compatible updates though.
>
> Does anybody know which future Seamonkey version is planned to support WebEx ?
>
Would it be po
NFN Smith wrote on 05/02/2021 17:44:
Does anybody know which future Seamonkey version is planned to support WebEx ?
WebEx is planned for 2.57, but isn't imminent, and developer notes indicate
that there hasn't been any serious work started on implementation.
I do have an alpha of 2.57 insta
NFN Smith wrote on 05/02/2021 17:44:
Rubens wrote:
Today I upgraded to 2.53.6.
Did you back up your profile? If not, you may have difficulties reverting,
without data loss. I forget where it started happening (perhaps 2.53.0), but
as with Firefox, profiles are now no longer backward compa
Rubens wrote:
Today I upgraded to 2.53.6.
Did you back up your profile? If not, you may have difficulties
reverting, without data loss. I forget where it started happening
(perhaps 2.53.0), but as with Firefox, profiles are now no longer
backward compatible.
But half of my dear extens
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote:
Looking at https://www.seamonkey-project.org/releases/#old_unofficial
I'd say things are not as bad as they look. The releases after 2.39
were: 2.40, 2.46, 2.48, 2.49.x and 2.53.x.
Lemuel Johnson points out that the current release notes suggest
installing 2.4
On 26/01/2021 12:05, AndrésH wrote:
There is a problem with the identification process of the web of
eldiario.es.
I can apparently login with my user, but the interface of comments
doesn't work.
Any idea to send to the developers of the website to correct the
problem they introduced with t
On 05/02/2021 06:39, Daniel wrote:
Dirk Fieldhouse wrote on 4/2/21 11:57 pm:
...>
Indeed. In the tests where I was able to enable and disable
i.ebayimg.com images in eBay emails, [Preferences>Privacy & Security>Images]
remained at "Load all images".
O.K., just looking a bit further, how ab
Daniel wrote:
Don Spam's Reckless Son wrote on 4/2/21 10:05 pm:
Daniel wrote:
Today I (finally) updated from SM 2.49.1 to SM 2.53.6 on Linux, as
shown in my sig file.
On my Win7 installation (updated from SM 2.49.5), after the update, I
had Lightning starting at SM bootup, but not in Linux w
21 matches
Mail list logo
